Re: RFS: vfu (updated package)

Hi 2008/5/31 Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > OoO En cette soirée bien amorcée du vendredi 30 mai 2008, vers 22:42, > "William Vera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > In fact, is not a bug, because vfu say 'support' for list and read, does not depend on them (unzip, bzip2, etc) for b

Re: RFS: vfu (updated package)

OoO En cette soirée bien amorcée du vendredi 30 mai 2008, vers 22:42, "William Vera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >>> In fact, is not a bug, because vfu say 'support' for list and read, >>> does not depend on them (unzip, bzip2, etc) for build o run the >>> program. >> >> Well, without unzip,

RFS: hwinfo (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 14.17-1 of my package "hwinfo". It builds these binary packages: hwinfo - Hardware identification system libhd14- Hardware identification system library libhd14-dev - Hardware identification system library and headers libhd14-do

RFS: sclapp and pytagsfs (updated packages)

Hi debian-mentors, I am looking for someone to sponsor updates to my packages sclapp and pytagsfs. I haven't heard from my earlier sponsor for these packages since over three weeks and 4 emails, hence this request to a wider audience. This update builds the following binary packages which the ch

Re: Need some tips on building Debian packages

Hello, On Fri, 30 May 2008, Paul Johnson wrote: > I've been asking around for help on building debian packages. > changes, and all of those fiddles were getting wrapped up into the one > big diff file, making it impossible to figure out who did what. One possible reason to do this is that the pe

Re: Need some tips on building Debian packages

Le Fri, May 30, 2008 at 03:07:57PM -0500, Paul Johnson a écrit : > > I keep wondering, "If the goal is to re-distribute 'pristine' source > code and patches, why doesn't Debian discourage users from untarring > the sourced code?"Why can't you make it so the debian directory is > not inside the

Re: Need some tips on building Debian packages

On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 15:07 -0500, Paul Johnson wrote: > Keep in mind that my background is in RPM building, where the emphasis > is on distributing "pristine" source code. I was initially > shocked/dismayed by the Debian approach because the source code gets > untarred and fiddled with by the pac

Re: RFS: vfu (updated package)

2008/5/30 Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du vendredi 30 mai 2008, vers 17:25, > "William Vera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > >> In fact, is not a bug, because vfu say 'support' for list and read, >> does not depend on them (unzip, bzip2, etc) for build o r

Re: RFS: lockrun

Noah Slater wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 07:04:30PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: >> debian/copyright: By the way, where did you get this line from? > Copyright: Copyright 2008, Stephen J. Friedl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I don't see any statement in the .c file that it is copyrighted. And as the

Re: Need some tips on building Debian packages

OoO En cette soirée bien amorcée du vendredi 30 mai 2008, vers 22:07, "Paul Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > I wonder how you do your day-to-day work on building debs? I have > followed the dh_make approach of opening the source, and dh_make gives > me template files in "debian" for co

Need some tips on building Debian packages

Hi I'm new here. I've been asking around for help on building debian packages. I've been building RPMS for about 1 decade, but never tried to build a Debian package. As preparation, I've read through the New Maintainer's Guide and miscellaneous other web pages. I came in through the Ubuntu do

Re: RFS: vfu (updated package)

OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du vendredi 30 mai 2008, vers 17:25, "William Vera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > In fact, is not a bug, because vfu say 'support' for list and read, > does not depend on them (unzip, bzip2, etc) for build o run the > program. Well, without unzip, vfu is unabl

Re: RFS: vfu (updated package)

Hi 2008/5/30 Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du vendredi 30 mai 2008, vers 17:25, > "William Vera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > >>> You should acknowledge latest NMU. Moreover, bug #470615 is not handled > >> How I can do it? > > You just add a line in

Re: RFS: vfu (updated package)

OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du vendredi 30 mai 2008, vers 17:25, "William Vera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> You should acknowledge latest NMU. Moreover, bug #470615 is not handled > How I can do it? You just add a line in debian/changelog with "Acknowledge NMU". Some time ago, yo

Re: RFS: gtk-nodoka-engine

OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du vendredi 30 mai 2008, vers 01:09, Christopher James Halse Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > The updated package is now up on mentors. Hi Christopher! I have uploaded your package (and I am now using it too)! Thanks for contributing to Debian. -- die

Re: RFS: dish

OoO En cette soirée bien amorcée du jeudi 29 mai 2008, vers 22:04, Dimitar Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > Thanks for your suggestions and help. I've resolved all issues and > uploaded a new package. > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/d

Re: RFS: lockrun

On Thursday 29 May 2008, Noah Slater wrote: > Hello, > > Thank you all for the suggestions/comments, etc. Hello, > On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 10:43:19AM +0300, George Danchev wrote: > > I'd rather reply with few questions ;-) -- it seems that the > > command-option.patch is not applied before buildi

Re: RFS: gnurobots (updated package)

OoO En ce début d'après-midi nuageux du vendredi 30 mai 2008, vers 14:28, Bradley Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> Please, add a debian/watch file. This allows DEHS to check if >> updates are available and will provide this information in a few >> pages. >> >> For some odd reason,

Re: RFS: php-ssh2, php-geoip (new packages)

> It needs to be 3.01. Sorry. Ok. Now the php-geoip's license is 3.01: http://pecl.php.net/package/geoip/ http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/pecl/geoip/geoip.c?revision=1.16&view=markup The updated package is now up on mentors. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsub

Re: RFS: vfu (updated package)

2008/5/29 Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > OoO En cette fin de nuit blanche du lundi 26 mai 2008, vers 05:15, > "William Vera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > >> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.06-5 >> of my package "vfu". > > Hi William! Hi Vincent > > You should acknow

Re: RFS: lockrun

On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 07:04:30PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > debian/copyright: > > Debianized-By: Noah Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Debianized-Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 22:58:05 + > > You should read the wiki page again now, those have a different name now. Heh, I was the one who made th

Re: RFS: gnurobots (updated package)

On Wed, 28 May 2008 15:07:20 +0200 Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please, add a debian/watch file. This allows DEHS to check if > updates are available and will provide this information in a few > pages. > > For some odd reason, include/map.h is GPLv3+. You should > update