Re: Bug#402462: Would like libtorrent-rasterbar

2008-05-22 Thread Jose Luis Rivas Contreras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Cristian Greco wrote: > > I agree that we should keep packages separate (although I never said the > contrary), but my opinion about the name of libtorrent10 package (name > of the package, _not_ the library) is still the same: what is the > rationale

Re: swac-tools - software for Audio Collections of Words

2008-05-22 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:06 AM, nico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The majority of audio collections are published under a Creative Commons BY > (2.0) license. But in 80% of cases I'm the copyright holder (or some friends > of mine). > So It would be possible to change the license if necessary. C

Laissez vous guidez sur Annonces-automobile.com

2008-05-22 Thread Lesannonces.fr
Si ce message ne s'affiche pas correctement, cliquez ici En exclusivité sur le Web ! Enregistrez votre recherche et attendez d'être contacté par le vendeur www.annonces-automobile.com En partenariat avec A bientôt sur ANNONCES Automobile. Pour vous désinscrire, cliquez ici.

RFS: lynis (updated package)

2008-05-22 Thread Francisco García
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.3-1 of my package "lynis". It builds these binary packages: lynis - security auditing tool for Unix based systems Description: security auditing tool for Unix based systems Lynis is an auditing tool for Unix. It scans the sys

Re: RFS: fslint (updated package)

2008-05-22 Thread Pádraig Brady
Pádraig Brady wrote: > Cameron Dale wrote: >> Hi Pádraig, >> >> I might be able to sponsor this, but I have some concerns below. I've uploaded fslint-2.26-2 to mentors addressing some of your concerns. I'll address the rest in the next release. thanks, Pádraig. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI

Re: RFS: poco and poco-doc (updated packages) [3rd try]

2008-05-22 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO En ce début d'après-midi ensoleillé du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 15:51, "Krzysztof Burghardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > It builds these binary packages: > libpoco5-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components > libpocodata5 - The C++ Portable Components Data library >

Re: Debian Mentors slow?

2008-05-22 Thread Christoph Haas
On Donnerstag, 22. Mai 2008, Magnus Therning wrote: > Admittedly it is a while since I uploaded a package to Debian Mentors, > but I don't remember it taking very long before a verdict was delivered > to my email. > > I uploaded a message last night (about 8 hours ago) and I still haven't > receive

Re: Compiling with -mtune?

2008-05-22 Thread Felipe Sateler
Neil Williams wrote: > This holds true for any architecture-specific checks in any package - > always, always check the HOST value - BUILD is almost always the wrong > variable to use. What if I'm checking for build-dependencies? For example, csound can use alsa, which isn't present on non linux

Re: Compiling with -mtune?

2008-05-22 Thread Felipe Sateler
Neil Williams wrote: > On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 12:42 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> Neil Williams wrote: >> >> > To check the arch, always test against the HOST architecture. Native >> > builds set HOST == BUILD but if the package is ever cross-built, your >> > debian/rules must allow building an

RFS: haskell-safe

2008-05-22 Thread Magnus Therning
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "haskell-safe". * Package name: haskell-safe Version : 0.2-1 Upstream Author : Neil Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/safe * License : BSD 3

swac-tools - software for Audio Collections of Words

2008-05-22 Thread nico
Hello, I'm working on the Shtooka Project. We record audio databases of words and sentences for educational use. The audio content is published under a CC-BY license (We provide yet about 75 000 records: French, English, Russian, Ukrainian, Belorussian, Czech, Chinese, Dutch... ). Each audio fi

RFS (QA Upload): libpam-foreground -- create lockfiles describing which users own which console

2008-05-22 Thread Barry deFreese
Hi folks, Here is a simple QA upload if someone has time to review and/or upload. The package had no bugs, I just changed the maintainer to Debian QA, fixed standards version, etc. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libpam-foreground/libpam-foreground_0.5.dsc Description: create l

Re: RFS: opus, uuwaf

2008-05-22 Thread Colin Turner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Vincent, Vincent Bernat wrote: >> He was indeed, and mentors had stopped processing the inbound queue, but >> all is well again now. > > Hi Colin! > > I have uploaded both packages to ftp-master. They should sit in NEW in a > short time. Thanks

Re: RFS: opus, uuwaf

2008-05-22 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO En cette matinée pluvieuse du jeudi 22 mai 2008, vers 10:12, Colin Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > He was indeed, and mentors had stopped processing the inbound queue, but > all is well again now. Hi Colin! I have uploaded both packages to ftp-master. They should sit in NEW in a short

Re: Compiling with -mtune?

2008-05-22 Thread Cyril Brulebois
On 22/05/2008, Neil Williams wrote: > > I think csound is unlikely to be cross-built. Sound synthesis is a > > pretty cpu-intensive task. > > :-) don't think that cross-building is only for low resource units. And please don't second-guess people in general. Think of those using clusters, e.g.

Re: RFS: fig2sxd

2008-05-22 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO En cette matinée ensoleillée du jeudi 22 mai 2008, vers 09:12, Alexander Bürger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > I uploaded a new version to mentors.debian.net. The changelog entry now > looks like: > * Set numeric locale to "C" at startup. > * Fix text placement problems by explicitly

Re: Compiling with -mtune?

2008-05-22 Thread Neil Williams
On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 12:42 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > Neil Williams wrote: > > > To check the arch, always test against the HOST architecture. Native > > builds set HOST == BUILD but if the package is ever cross-built, your > > debian/rules must allow building an ARM package on amd64 (HOST=AR

Re: RFS: fslint (updated package)

2008-05-22 Thread Cameron Dale
On 5/22/08, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 21:20 -0700, Cameron Dale wrote: > > Unless you released 2.25-1 somewhere else, merge the unreleased 2.25-1 > > and 2.26-1 changelog entries into one 2.26-1, otherwise the bugs > > probably won't get closed automaticall

Re: Compiling with -mtune?

2008-05-22 Thread Felipe Sateler
Neil Williams wrote: > On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 01:12 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> Hi. Csound, a package I maintain, supports enabling a set of gcc >> optimizations via a build option. Code generated with those options can be >> significantly faster (I've seen improvements of over 2x). However, th

Re: Compiling with -mtune?

2008-05-22 Thread Cyril Brulebois
On 22/05/2008, Neil Williams wrote: > I currently spend large amounts of time crossbuilding packages for ARM > on amd64 machines so, yes, ARM on amd64 was an example. This might not be that obvious for people not aware of your timetable, which is why I highlighted it was meant to be an example rat

Re: Compiling with -mtune?

2008-05-22 Thread Neil Williams
On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 17:40 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > On 22/05/2008, Neil Williams wrote: > > To check the arch, always test against the HOST architecture. Native > > builds set HOST == BUILD but if the package is ever cross-built, your > > debian/rules must allow building an ARM package on a

Re: Compiling with -mtune?

2008-05-22 Thread Cyril Brulebois
On 22/05/2008, Neil Williams wrote: > To check the arch, always test against the HOST architecture. Native > builds set HOST == BUILD but if the package is ever cross-built, your > debian/rules must allow building an ARM package on amd64 (HOST=ARM, > BUILD=amd64) and *NOT* enable -mtune. That shou

Re: Bug#402462: Would like libtorrent-rasterbar

2008-05-22 Thread Cristian Greco
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:28:49PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > Because LibTorrent is _not_ part of the rtorrent upstream tarball. > > Well, there's one reason to ship it separately then :). I thought libtorrent > was > part of the rtorrent source. > > > They're shipped individually [...] >

Re: RFS: fslint (updated package)

2008-05-22 Thread Pádraig Brady
Cameron Dale wrote: > Hi Pádraig, > > I might be able to sponsor this, but I have some concerns below. > > On 5/20/08, Pádraig Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Dear mentors, >> >> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.26-1 >> of my package "fslint". >> >> It builds these binary p

Re: RFS: libtorrent-rasterbar and qBittorrent (updated)

2008-05-22 Thread Cyril Brulebois
On 21/05/2008, Simon Richter wrote: > I wonder what we should do with ASIO. > > You are essentially patching the source to use the ASIO version inside > Boost. There is also a standalone ASIO library (which uses "asio" > instead of "boost::asio") I've been told long ago (months) that the standalo

Re: RFS: fslint (updated package)

2008-05-22 Thread Neil Williams
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 21:20 -0700, Cameron Dale wrote: > Hi Pádraig, > Some more comments: > > Unless you released 2.25-1 somewhere else, merge the unreleased 2.25-1 > and 2.26-1 changelog entries into one 2.26-1, otherwise the bugs > probably won't get closed automatically. Wrong - all the spons

Re: Compiling with -mtune?

2008-05-22 Thread Neil Williams
On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 01:12 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > Hi. Csound, a package I maintain, supports enabling a set of gcc optimizations > via a build option. Code generated with those options can be significantly > faster (I've seen improvements of over 2x). However, this option means adding > a

Re: RFS: opus, uuwaf

2008-05-22 Thread Colin Turner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Vincent, Vincent Bernat wrote: >> So, I'll check it again in a while, and see if the upload has been >> delayed, or rejected for some reason I can't see. > > I still don't see them. Maybe a problem with mentors (no new packages > have made the

Debian Mentors slow?

2008-05-22 Thread Magnus Therning
Admittedly it is a while since I uploaded a package to Debian Mentors, but I don't remember it taking very long before a verdict was delivered to my email. I uploaded a message last night (about 8 hours ago) and I still haven't received any word on whether it's been accepted. It doesn't appear in

Re: RFS: obm

2008-05-22 Thread Sylvain Garcia
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 18:46 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: > OoO En cette matinée ensoleillée du mercredi 21 mai 2008, vers 09:47, > Sylvain Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > > >> I am still very uncomfortable with obm-conf package. You should let > >> debconf handle any reconfiguration/

Re: RFS: fig2sxd

2008-05-22 Thread Alexander Bürger
Hi, > >> ... acknowledge ... NMU ... > > > I thought so too, but I did not know what to write there, so I skipped > > it. Maybe "thanks for the NMU of 0.17-1.1"? I can hardly put > > "(Closes: 455650)" as the bug is already closed and archived. What do > > you suggest? > > Well, an NMU should