Re: RFS: NMU: conglomerate -- user-friendly XML editor

On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Barry deFreese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here is an NMU to fix conglomerate double-build bugs. Geert looks inactive on his 3 packages, despite being active on the lists & bts. Might be a good idea to prod him about orphaning conglomerate/p3nfs and removing him

RFS: NMU: conglomerate -- user-friendly XML editor

Hi folks, Here is an NMU to fix conglomerate double-build bugs. If someone has time to review and/or upload to delayed, I'd appreciate it. http://mentors.workaround.org/debian/pool/main/c/conglomerate/conglomerate_0.9.1-3.1.dsc Description: user-friendly XML editor Conglomerate is a free, as

Re: RFS: Scid and TeXSkak

Dear Willem, On Mo, 31 Mär 2008, W. van den Akker wrote: > the fact that I take over the Scid (and latter TexSkak) package. I cannot do anything concerning the Scid package, but everything related to TeX I would suggest that you contact the Debian TeX Task Force under [EMAIL PROTECTED] sk

RFS: liblunar and lunar-applet

Hello, lunar-applet is chinese calendar applet for gnome environment. it's version is 2.0-1 in this upload(in sid it's 1.8) in lunar-applet 2.0, the library part is separated to liblunar by upstream. it's lintian clean, please help upload it. PS. I have set DM-Upload-Allowed in these two packag

Unused libSM and libICE (was: Re: RFS: xiterm+thai)

Also Cc: debian-x for comments on this issue. On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please pass the many gcc warnings and these dpkg-shlibdeps warnings upstream: > > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: debian/xiterm+thai/usr/bin/xiterm+thai > shouldn't be linked with lib

Re: RFS: lynis (updated package)

> lynis - security auditing tool for Unix based > systems Please see my other recent mail on lynis: Some issues are still not fixed. Another thing is patching. I think like 90% DDs would use a patch system instead of patching the tarball using the .diff.gz. A potential sponsor may require yo