Hi,
Here is an NMU for kcemirror that closes RC bug #465624.
Description: Windows CE remote control tool like VNC
KCeMirror provides a way to interact with a Windows CE
device via the desktop. The display of the Windows CE
device is captured and transfered to the desktop where
it gets displayed
Hi,
Here is an NMU to fix RC bug #464296. I didn't get carried away this
time, I swear. :-)
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lwm/lwm_1.2.1-1.1.dsc
Description: Lightweight Window Manager
lwm is a window manager for X that tries to keep out of your face.
There are no icons, no but
Hello,
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008, David Paleino wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.13 of the package
> "syslog-summary", which I'm also adopting (ITA: #455005).
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, David Paleino wrote:
> I've fixed everything, you can find the new package at the same url as befo
Hi there,
I reuploaded "ee" to m.d.n [0].
Finally i modified the description in debian/control and basically re
wrote the debian/copyright file which was kind of a mess.
[0] dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/ee/ee_1.4.6-1.dsc
Thanks,
Mauro Lizaur
--
JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BE
>
> Hi all,
>
> Recently there was an FTBFS bug #459028 on texmacs 1:1.0.6.11-3. There
> has also been an NMU to fix that. However, I am unable to reproduce it on
> my machine and I am perplexed as to what I am doing wrong.
>
[...]
>
>
> The build proceeds without any errors. Could someone
Hi all,
Recently there was an FTBFS bug #459028 on texmacs 1:1.0.6.11-3. There
has also been an NMU to fix that. However, I am unable to reproduce it on
my machine and I am perplexed as to what I am doing wrong.
These are the steps I used.
1) download the source for texmacs 1:1.0.6.11-3.1 us
Neil Williams wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:21:10 -0500
Barry deFreese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
from changelog:
* Remove -X revisions on build-depends.
Huh? I can see that removing -1 is most often a good idea, but -3?
It was my understanding that build-dependi
Hi!
* Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080221 17:16]:
> urgency=low: Usual upload, and you would want Britney to try to
> transition the package to testing in 10 days (of no RC bugginess)
[..]
> Please see:
>
> http://www.debian.org/devel/testing
It should be mentioned, that it is good practi
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Toby Smithe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Quote the note from upstream in debian/copyright and I can't see a
> > problem. Leave it out and the ftp-masters could legitimately reject
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Siegfried-Angel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to ask you where I could find an explanation about what the
> 'urgency' field in debian/changelog is for, as it has been intriguing
> me for quite some time now.
>
> I've checked the Debian Policy Manual and
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 04:46:50PM +0100, Siegfried-Angel wrote:
> I'd like to ask you where I could find an explanation about what the
> 'urgency' field in debian/changelog is for, as it has been intriguing
> me for quite some time now.
>
> I've checked the Debian Policy Manual and the Debian New
Dear mentors,
I'd like to ask you where I could find an explanation about what the
'urgency' field in debian/changelog is for, as it has been intriguing
me for quite some time now.
I've checked the Debian Policy Manual and the Debian New Maintainers'
Guide but couldn't find much information about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
here is my second attempt to request a sponsorship. I decide to write a
new one because my first RFS
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2007/11/msg00082.html) was
orrible. Lately following hints received from Bernd Zeimetz (to whom I
Hi,
Miriam Ruiz wrote:
* Package name: boolstuff
Version : 0.1.11
Uploaded.
Simon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear mentors,
I am trying to adopt these two packages.
So I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 5.1-1 of
"libapache-mod-layout" and the new version 2.1-1 of "libapache-mod-random".
In both cases this upload includes a fix for apache1.x being removed and only
apache2 being avaible.
-
Il giorno Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:46:20 +0100
Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> The package looks fine at first glance. The only issue I found is this
> in diff.gz:
>
> [..]
>
> [..] Did this slip into diff.gz unnoticed [..]
Yes, sorry.
> Also, shouldn't pinot depend on (or at least r
16 matches
Mail list logo
