Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:8.2.0.7-3
of my package "plr".
It builds these binary packages:
postgresql-8.2-plr - Procedural language interface between PostgreSQL 8.2 and R
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 460366
The p
> "Peter" == Peter Collingbourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my packages
Peter> "ladr" and "prover9-manual" (I am packaging the
Peter> documentation separately because upstream distributes it in
Peter> a separate tarball).
I
Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 18/01/2008, Nicolas Valcárcel wrote:
>>> Had a quick look, the following are improvement suggestions:
>>> - the package is not lintian clean:
>>> W: terminator: package-contains-empty-directory usr/lib/
>> This is a bug in python-central IIRC, i
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Valcárcel schrieb:
> On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 11:02 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 02:43:52PM -0500, Nicolas Valcárcel wrote:
>> Moreover, I would be happy to sponsor it but I've a personal rule: I
>> want packages to be on some collaborative maintenan
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 11:12:16AM -0500, Nicolas Valcárcel wrote:
> > Moreover, I would be happy to sponsor it but I've a personal rule: I
> > want packages to be on some collaborative maintenance repository. So go
> > find one (add the proper Vcs-* fields to debian/control) and I'll be
> > happy
Hi!
* Iván Forcada Atienza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080118 16:00]:
> 1) Should I reopen the existing bug [2] or open a new ITP??
Don't know of any reason that would be in favour of one option or an
other. Out of personal taste, I would recycle the old ITP.
> 2) Should I notify the original ITP op
On 18/01/2008, Nicolas Valcárcel wrote:
> > Had a quick look, the following are improvement suggestions:
> > - the package is not lintian clean:
> > W: terminator: package-contains-empty-directory usr/lib/
>
> This is a bug in python-central IIRC, i have tried to fix it for hours
> but someone p
On 2008-01-18, Iván Forcada Atienza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --yLVHuoLXiP9kZBkt
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Hi mentors!!
>
> I am interested in kgtk application [1]. After a search, I've found t
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 11:02 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 02:43:52PM -0500, Nicolas Valcárcel wrote:
> > I still looking for a sponsor, can someone take a look at it?
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=460317
>
> Had a quick look, the following are i
Hi mentors!!
I am interested in kgtk application [1]. After a search, I've found that
it was ITP'd time ago, but the bug was automatically closed 365 days
after [2].
Now, I want to start working on it (in fact, it's already packaged
because I needed it, and only missing my sponsor reviewal) but I
"Paul Wise" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Better to run a test suite or otherwise cause an FTBFS on
> architectures where it is known to build broken or unusable binaries.
> Not being fully portable isn't an RC bug and will not block testing
> migration unless it is a regression and there is no go
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 02:43:52PM -0500, Nicolas Valcárcel wrote:
> I still looking for a sponsor, can someone take a look at it?
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=460317
Had a quick look, the following are improvement suggestions:
- the package is not lintian clean:
W: termina
12 matches
Mail list logo
