Il giorno Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:02:10 -0800
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Should I call ldconfig in post{inst,rm} also in this case then? Lintian
> > complains about it: it says it's "useless". Should I override this, or is it
> > really
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mediatomb".
* Package name: mediatomb
Version : 0.10.0.1dfsg-1~0unreleased1
Upstream Author : Gena Batyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Sergey Bostandzhyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
>
>> Don't override this, it *is* a bug in the package. The propper fix
>> is to move the library into a private directory inside /usr/lib, say
>> /usr/lib/gthumb
>
> Thank you.
> Should I call l
Il giorno Fri, 28 Dec 2007 17:22:59 -0600
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> Don't override this, it *is* a bug in the package. The propper fix
> is to move the library into a private directory inside /usr/lib, say
> /usr/lib/gthumb
Thank you.
Should I call ldconfig in
Robin Cornelius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There are a couple of files that do NOT have copyright, these were
> created by a US government contractor and therefor :-
>
> Copyright: It is the policy of NLM (U.S. National Library of Medicine)
>(and U.S. government) to not assert copyrigh
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 11:59:37PM +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3:2.10.7-1
> of the package "gthumb", which I'm adopting.
>
> The package is not lintian clean, it has 3 overrides:
> - gthumb: no-shlibs-control-file and
> package-name-doesnt-match-so
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3:2.10.7-1
of the package "gthumb", which I'm adopting.
It builds these binary packages:
gthumb - an image viewer and browser
gthumb-data - an image viewer and browser - arch-independent files
The -data package is new, and is there
On Dec 29, 2007 8:04 AM, CaStarCo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "freetube".
I don't think such a small script (wrapper around youtube-dl and
ffmpeg2theora) should be uploaded to Debian, except as part of another
package. Perhaps it could be added to youtub
Dear mentors, (sorry for the reply, i've forget some data in the
previos e-mail)
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "freetube".
* Package name: freetube
Version : 0.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Julià Mestieri Ferrer
Andreu Correa Casablanca ([EMAIL
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mediatomb".
* Package name: mediatomb
Version : 0.10.0.1dfsg-1~0unreleased
Upstream Author : Gena Batyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Sergey Bostandzhyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "freetube".
* Package name: freetube
Version : 0.0.1-1
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]
* License : [fill in]
Section : web
It
Robin Cornelius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There are a couple of files that do NOT have copyright, these were
> created by a US government contractor and therefor :-
>
> Copyright: It is the policy of NLM (U.S. National Library of Medicine)
>(and U.S. government) to not assert copyright
On Fri, 2007-12-28 at 14:56 +, Robin Cornelius wrote:
> My main questions are :-
>
> 1) is it necessary to repeat the license text every time, for example :-
>
> Files: libopenjpeg/j2k.c
> libopenjpeg/j2k.h
> libopenjpeg/openjpeg.h
> Copyright: © 2002-2007, Communications and Remote
Dear mentors,
I wanted to ask about the debian/copyright file, I am currently working
on a package (openjpeg a jpeg2000 library) that has a long and
complicated copyright history. What i mean by that is there have been
many contributors over the years and therefor very few files have
identica
On 28/12/2007, Mauro wrote:
> Hi Kumar,
> i followed your advices and re-uploaded the package to mentors.debian.net;
> but im afraid that i didn't understood what you meant by 'my package
> being a native package',
> i mean the differences between the source in the orig.tar.gz and the
> package are
On Dec 28, 2007 5:31 PM, Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have followed the thread (as Debian TeX maintainer) but I was too late
> in fetching the package, and now it cannot be found on the mentors
> server anymore, and it is not already in the pool of ftp.debian.org. So
> no other
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 01:25:26 -0300
Mauro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Guys,
> I'm trying to upload my package to mentors.debian.net, but when i do
> this i just an error email saying something like "...the
> package_x-y.dsc file mentions package_x-y.orig.tar.gz file, but this
> file wasn't u
Hi Paul, hi Theppitak,
I have followed the thread (as Debian TeX maintainer) but I was too late
in fetching the package, and now it cannot be found on the mentors
server anymore, and it is not already in the pool of ftp.debian.org. So
no other comments from my side ...
On Fr, 28 Dez 2007, Paul Wi
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 04:20:10PM +0930, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Dec 28, 2007 4:12 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 03:28:15PM +0930, Paul Wise wrote:
> > > Question:
> > >
> > > Where does debian/babel.sty come from? Shouldn't it be generated at
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
