Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bart Martens wrote:
> > As far as I know, it has not yet been decided that the
> > debian/copyright files must be formatted as described on the wiki
> > page quoted above. Or did I miss some decision ?
>
> Don't confuse it being mandatory with it being allo
On Nov 28, 2007 8:28 PM, Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IMO there's nothing wrong with suggesting to do things in a certain way,
> even if there is no consensus about that (yet). Perhaps this suggestion
> looked a bit too much like "this is how it should be done" and not
> enough like "y
On Wednesday 28 November 2007 00:28:08 Paul Wise wrote:
>
> I don't have the hardware or kernel module packaging experience, but
> here are a couple of things:
>
> Homepage is a field in the source package:
> http://wiki.debian.org/HomepageFieldHOWTO
OK, I've updated the control file. The Homepage
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 07:45:07PM +, Joey Hess wrote:
> Bart Martens wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 17:44 +0930, Paul Wise wrote:
> > > I'd suggest that the copyright file
> > > should be redone and done so it can be parsed automatically:
> > >
> > > http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/Copyrig
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 10:27:21AM +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 17:44 +0930, Paul Wise wrote:
> > I'd suggest that the copyright file
> > should be redone and done so it can be parsed automatically:
> >
> > http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
>
> On Wed, 2007-11
Bart Martens wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 17:44 +0930, Paul Wise wrote:
> > I'd suggest that the copyright file
> > should be redone and done so it can be parsed automatically:
> >
> > http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> As far as I know, it has not yet been decid
Paul Wise wrote:
> On Nov 26, 2007 4:36 PM, Thomas Goirand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> I suspect (didn't check) that you are missing some copyright info
>>> since there are lots of upstream authors, but only one copyright
>>> holder.
>> Yes, my copyright file was really wrong, and the package
Hallo C.J.,
C.J. Adams-Collier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 12:32 +, Jörg Sommer wrote:
>> C.J. Adams-Collier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > # Fully qualified paths to required programs
>> > START_STOP_DAEMON=/sbin/start-stop-daemon
>> > CAT=/bin/cat
>> > ECHO=/bin/echo
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 17:44 +0930, Paul Wise wrote:
> I'd suggest that the copyright file
> should be redone and done so it can be parsed automatically:
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 18:21 +0930, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Nov 28, 2007 6:15 PM, Bart Martens
Great. I was hoping for this answer :)
On Nov 26, 2007 5:25 PM, Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 25/11/2007, C.J. Adams-Collier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > is there something like a service-common package that provides a helper
> > script like the following for services to sou
[I'm on the list no need to CC me]
On Nov 28, 2007 6:15 PM, Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As far as I know, it has not yet been decided that the debian/copyright
> files must be formatted as described on the wiki page quoted above. Or
> did I miss some decision ?
You didn't miss any
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 17:44 +0930, Paul Wise wrote:
> I'd suggest that the copyright file
> should be redone and done so it can be parsed automatically:
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
Hi Paul,
As far as I know, it has not yet been decided that the debian/copyright
files mus
On Nov 26, 2007 4:36 PM, Thomas Goirand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I suspect (didn't check) that you are missing some copyright info
> > since there are lots of upstream authors, but only one copyright
> > holder.
>
> Yes, my copyright file was really wrong, and the package was rejected by
> f
13 matches
Mail list logo
