On 17/09/2007, Helmut Grohne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've found a tool called japa pretty useful for doing audio analysis. It
> was developed by Fons Adriaensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> under the GPL
> and is now available at http://www.kokkinizita.net/linuxaudio/. As I
> regularly use this
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 19:19:55 +0200
"Marc Pavot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >
> > As mentioned by other reply, simple rm in clean target should do it.
>
>
> Ok that's what I had done for ario_0.2-2.
>
> I just noticed one more thing - as we now have Homepage field support
> > in dpk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear mentors,
I am still looking for a sponsor for my package "ndoutils".
* Package name: ndoutils
Version : 1.4b5-1
Upstream Author : Ethan Galstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://nagios.org
* License : GPL
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 10:18:48PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> i know it is a problem on my side, but please give me a bit time. Sorry
> for communicating this a bit bad, but i was quite overworked the last
> weeks, esp. as i am currently moving to a new home.
>
> For the others: i allready
On 17/09/2007, Chris Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Might anybody be interested in sponsoring this package?
Maybe you could explain the difference between this honeypot and the
other various honeypot packages already in the archive.
>
> Here is an updated summary:
>
> Honeytrap is a low-i
Dear mentors,
the package is now lintian clean. I'd very appreciate sponsorship or
comments. ;-)
thank you very much in advance,
Jack ;-)
JackTheDipper wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-color-chooser".
> It's not yet in Debian.
>
> * Package name: gnome-color-chooser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear mentors,
I am still looking for a sponsor for my package "nagvis".
* Package name: nagvis
Version : 1:1.1-1
Upstream Author : Lars Michelsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Michael Luebben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "php-validate".
I want to package and maintain this package for Debian as
it's a dependancy for centreon [1], a nagios frontend I
want to package for Debian.
* Package name : php-validate
Version : 0.7.0-1
Upstream Author
Hi!
I've found a tool called japa pretty useful for doing audio analysis. It
was developed by Fons Adriaensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> under the GPL
and is now available at http://www.kokkinizita.net/linuxaudio/. As I
regularly use this software on multiple systems I'd like it to see in
the Debian Arch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Martin,
Martin Zobel-Helas schrieb:
> i know it is a problem on my side, but please give me a bit time. Sorry
> for communicating this a bit bad, but i was quite overworked the last
> weeks, esp. as i am currently moving to a new home.
Oh ok. S
Hendirk,
i know it is a problem on my side, but please give me a bit time. Sorry
for communicating this a bit bad, but i was quite overworked the last
weeks, esp. as i am currently moving to a new home.
For the others: i allready had told Hendrik 2 weeks ago i would be
willing to upload both pack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear mentors,
I am still looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.6.1rc5-2
of my package "nagiosgrapher".
It builds these binary packages:
nagiosgrapher - Charting add-on for Nagios
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michelle Konzack wrote:
[...]
> since 2007-08-01 I am now jobless (yeah, the new French GOV do not like
> that I stay in the army as PMC) and today (Saturday) I was asked by an
> owner of a german Enterprise whether it is possibel to port GNU/Linux,
>
On 9/17/07, David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> > ...
> >
> > I'm indeed missing the signature file but I will add this later.
> > Other than that, is this package ready?
>
> We can't know: upload it somewhere on the network (the upstream
Gregory Colpart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm sure ;-) Note that you could also make an RFP for packages
> needed (even you have habilities to make the first package, see
> if you want maintain it during next years in Debian).
Sure, my ultimate plan is to hand the maintenance of these package
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, liran tal wrote:
While attempting to run dpkg-buildpackage to create a .deb package of the
current directory
where I'm at I'm receiving the error message:
dpkg-genchanges: failure: cannot read files list file: No such file or
directory
my debian/ directory reads the follow
Gregory Colpart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The last release dates from 2005 april. I see in you last email
> that you could maintain upstream source code if needed. I see
> there are open bugs for this module, perhaps could you consider
> to become upstream author?
Not a bad idea. I'll look a
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.07.ds1-1 of my package
"zimpl". Usually, Anibal Monsalve Salazar sponsors the package, but I
haven't got a reply for a few days, so I assume he is busy right now.
It builds these binary packages:
zimpl - mathematical modeling lan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Don't top-quote.
Il giorno Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:17:16 +0200
"liran tal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> I see.
> Well, I did create debian/ myself at first and then use dh_make to consult
> with some missing files I might have.
>
> I should note tha
I see.
Well, I did create debian/ myself at first and then use dh_make to consult
with some missing files I might have.
I should note that what I'm packaging is a web application software and so
it has
no need for compilation of any sort but rather just copy the files tree and
run the scripts.
An
Le 17 sept. 07 à 13:47, liran tal a écrit :
Dear Mentors and Debian users,
Hi,
[...] where as the rules file is actually empty (filled with #)
Well, your rules file must not be empty! It must be a Makefile, and
contain the instructions to _build_ the .deb when called with the
appropri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il giorno Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:47:18 +0200
"liran tal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> Dear Mentors and Debian users,
Hi,
>
> ...
>
> where as the rules file is actually empty (filled with #)
debian/rules should _NEVER_ be empty. I think the pro
Dear Mentors and Debian users,
While attempting to run dpkg-buildpackage to create a .deb package of the
current directory
where I'm at I'm receiving the error message:
dpkg-genchanges: failure: cannot read files list file: No such file or
directory
my debian/ directory reads the following files
Hi Patrick,
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:12:49 +0200
Patrick Schoenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > added remove target in rule file.
>
> ah.. this manpage isn't part of the upstream source is it?
Yes. Upstream doesn't contain manpage because he provide that as
Perldoc. I'm create this manpage
> > Try adding 'sync' after both steps and see if that changes performance.
>
> I did, see "Note 3" in the wiki. It's actually XFS, that caches things
> on amd64, so with sync, the XFS takes 3.5s on amd64 (instead of those
> 0.5s). But ext3 with sync is still very fast (from 0.2s to 0.4s)
> everywh
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 10:32:06AM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> since 2007-08-01 I am now jobless (yeah, the new French GOV do not like
> that I stay in the army as PMC) and today (Saturday) I was asked by an
> owner of a german Enterprise whether it is possibel to port GNU/Linux,
> specialy De
Hello *,
since 2007-08-01 I am now jobless (yeah, the new French GOV do not like
that I stay in the army as PMC) and today (Saturday) I was asked by an
owner of a german Enterprise whether it is possibel to port GNU/Linux,
specialy Debian to this new ARCHITECTURE.
Now I need to ask you, how one s
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "honeytrap".
>
> * Package name: honeytrap
> Version : 0.7.0-1
> Upstream Author : Tillmann Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://honeytrap.mwcollect.org
> * License : GPL
> Section : n
Hi,
Hideki Yamane wrote:
>> * Is there any reason to recreate the (already existing) manpage
>> during build? Eventually the other way round: Is it needed to have
>> a manpage in debian/ if you create a newer version of it during
>> build? Also this causes the clean target to be (afa
29 matches
Mail list logo
