Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Given is pretty much spot-on in:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2007/08/msg00308.html
Ironically, that message (at least, the one presented at that archive
page) doesn't display its non-ASCII characters properly in a UTF-8
locale.
-
"Mihamina (R12y) Rakotomandimby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I need to modify again the patched part.
> So, I need to "patch the patch".
> I guess in real world I wont patch the patch, but what is the easy way
> to do so?
Allow the patch to proceed, and then simply apply another subsequent
patc
Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The debhelper tools (dh_install) used to use debian/tmp but now
> (depending on DH_COMPAT) use debian/$package. So this is a small-ish
> lintian bug.
But debian/tmp also happens to be where dh_make defaults to install (make
DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp), and then
Mihamina (R12y) Rakotomandimby wrote:
> Hi,
> There is a list of softwares already debian packaged.
> The packager has applied a patch on them.
> I need to modify again the patched part.
> So, I need to "patch the patch".
> I guess in real world I wont patch the patch, but what is the easy way
> t
Neil Williams wrote:
On Sat, 08 Sep 2007 23:23:13 +0100
David Claughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I've created the beginnings of a package for sqliteman (upstream site is
http://sqliteman.com).
It's a GUI frontend for a well established and generally not that buggy
backend - it doesn't
On 10/09/2007, Francesco Cecconi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear DD,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kopete-otr".
>
Maybe you should send an ITP first and add a (Closes: #nn) to the
debian/changelog
>
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
>
> Kind regard
Brandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (10/09/2007):
> I'm asking mostly for bug reporting. I don't maintain any libraries.
> When I file a bug report against a library for breaking ABI
> compatability without bumping the soname, do I report it as serious?
> Or just important? What would the justification be
> Soname bumps are upstream business...
Yeah. That makes sense. But sometimes upstream doesn't do it.
I'm asking mostly for bug reporting. I don't maintain any libraries.
When I file a bug report against a library for breaking ABI
compatability without bumping the soname, do I report it as seriou
Hi,
* Mihamina (R12y) Rakotomandimby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-11 02:28]:
> There is a list of softwares already debian packaged.
> The packager has applied a patch on them.
> I need to modify again the patched part.
> So, I need to "patch the patch".
> I guess in real world I wont patch the pat
Dear DD,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kopete-otr".
* Package name : kopete-otr
Version : 0.6-1
* URL : http://kopete-otr.follefuder.org/
* License : GPL
Section : net
It builds these binary packages:
ko
x-post to debian-java, debian-mentors and pkg-java-maintainers
Hi,
I'm building docbook-xsl-saxon, a Java package, that provides
docbook-xsl related extensions. For those interested in the packaging
files, see
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debian-xml-sgml/packages/docbook-xsl-saxon/trunk/debian/?rev
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:25:52AM +0200, Mihamina (R12y) Rakotomandimby wrote:
> There is a list of softwares already debian packaged.
> The packager has applied a patch on them.
> I need to modify again the patched part.
> So, I need to "patch the patch".
> I guess in real world I wont patch the
Hi Bas,
I fixed (nearly) all problems and uploaded a new package.
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 09:55:31AM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> I have some questions before uploading the package:
> - You have specified "Priority: extra". According to policy, "This
> contains all packages that conflict with ot
Hi,
There is a list of softwares already debian packaged.
The packager has applied a patch on them.
I need to modify again the patched part.
So, I need to "patch the patch".
I guess in real world I wont patch the patch, but what is the easy way
to do so?
I know a bit using dpatch (or is there a r
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 07:03:57PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 12:50:53AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > (Colin, CC-ing you as I'm not sure if you're of aware of this long thread,
> > and both man-db and groff are your territory...)
>
> I wasn't aware of it, thanks. Sorry
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 07:59:50 -0700
Brandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Might seem like a silly question to most people. But is it required to
> bump the soname of a library when it breaks ABI compatability with an
> older version?
Yes.
You (in association with upstream) also need to decide whe
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 12:50:53AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> (Colin, CC-ing you as I'm not sure if you're of aware of this long thread,
> and both man-db and groff are your territory...)
I wasn't aware of it, thanks. Sorry for my delay in responding.
I read through the thread and there are a
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 08:24:19PM +0200, Jan Beyer wrote:
> Justin Pryzby schrieb am 07.09.2007 17:46 Uhr:
> > On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 05:20:56PM +0200, Jan Beyer wrote:
> >> On 09/07/2007 01:55 PM, Justin Pryzby wrote :
> >>> On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 11:54:18AM +0200, Jan Beyer wrote:
> And
Brandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Might seem like a silly question to most people. But is it required to
> bump the soname of a library when it breaks ABI compatability with an
> older version? I always thought that is was, but I can't find anything
> in debian-policy that says that it is requ
Brandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (10/09/2007):
> Might seem like a silly question to most people. But is it required to
> bump the soname of a library when it breaks ABI compatability with an
> older version? I always thought that is was, but I can't find anything
> in debian-policy that says that it is
Might seem like a silly question to most people. But is it required to
bump the soname of a library when it breaks ABI compatability with an
older version? I always thought that is was, but I can't find anything
in debian-policy that says that it is required. In fact, it isn't even
suggested.
-Bra
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xulrunner-l10n".
* Package name: xulrunner-l10n
Version : 1.8.1-1
Upstream Author : Mozilla Project and Mozilla Localization Projects.
* URL : http://www.mozilla.org/projects/l10n/
* License : GPL LGPL MP
2007/9/10, Jens Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Bas,
>
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 09:55:31AM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > I have some questions before uploading the package:
>
> first of all thanks for your review.
>
> > - You have specified "Priority: extra". According to policy, "This
> > cont
Hi Bas,
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 09:55:31AM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> I have some questions before uploading the package:
first of all thanks for your review.
> - You have specified "Priority: extra". According to policy, "This
> contains all packages that conflict with others with required,
Hello again,
I have some questions before uploading the package:
- You have specified "Priority: extra". According to policy, "This
contains all packages that conflict with others with required,
important, standard or optional priorities, or are only likely to be
useful if you already know
2007/9/10, Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I'm taking a look at it, and see that Sam is in the Uploaders. Should I
> upload the package (if it's good), or does he normally do that?
>
> Thanks,
> Bas
Please upload it, Bas :)
PS: BTW, It's better to use [EMAIL PROTECTED]
instead of [EMAI
Hi,
I'm taking a look at it, and see that Sam is in the Uploaders. Should I
upload the package (if it's good), or does he normally do that?
Thanks,
Bas
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 01:15:04AM +0200, Jens Seidel wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.20070315-5
27 matches
Mail list logo
