Re: RFS: libwhisker2-perl

2007-08-15 Thread Martín Ferrari
Deepak, On 8/4/07, Deepak Tripathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libwhisker2-perl". > I've seen that you updated libwhisker-perl to version 2.4 which seems wrong, as that should be libwhisker2-perl.. Or one of the two should be deleted..

Re: RFS: audtty

2007-08-15 Thread Kevin Coyner
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 09:30:01AM +0200, Chris Taylor wrote.. > I fixed the spelling error, and cleaned up the rules file a bit. > This rule tells CDBS that the makefile does not contain a check > target, making sure that it does not attempt to call it. > > I uploaded the fixed packages t

Re: Duplicate file names? (was Re: RFS: ifstat (updated package))

2007-08-15 Thread Robert James Clay
On Aug 14, 2007, at 7:43 PM, The Fungi wrote: On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 07:30:41PM -0400, Robert James Clay wrote: Would I be correct in thinking that it is a bug for files of the same name to come from different packages? For data files, I don't mind so much; but I've always been leery

Re: RFS: oggconvert (updated package)

2007-08-15 Thread Oleksandr Moskalenko
* Luca Falavigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-15 11:33:14 +0200]: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.1.1-2 > of my package "oggconvert". > > It builds these binary packages: > oggconvert - Convert media files to free formats > > The package appears to be lint

Re: RFH: start-stop-daemon, broken behavior when daemon already running

2007-08-15 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Replacing --exec with --startas seems to fix the issue. I understand that --exec mail be wrong because the daemon is written in perl, so the processus name wouldn't be what's passed to exec. However --startas description is quite obvious to me and I don't understand what it does exactly. Adam Céci

RFH: start-stop-daemon, broken behavior when daemon already running

2007-08-15 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Hi, Could you help to understand why start-stop-daemon do not return 1 when trying to start my daemon which is already running ? Here is some log about what happens: bash-3.1# start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --pidfile /var/run/dkimproxy.out-dkim.pid --exec /usr/local/bin/dkimproxy.out -- --dae

Re: RHS: libterm-ansicolor-ruby

2007-08-15 Thread Adam Borowski
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 04:02:57PM -, Thomas Dickey wrote: > The Fungi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Of course, I can't imagine an ANSI library would be anything more > > than a few dozen string constant definitions, unless you wanted > > man tput > > (no point in hardcoding "a few dozen

Re: RFS: xawtv (updated package)

2007-08-15 Thread Russ Allbery
"Nelson A. de Oliveira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I: xawtv: possible-non-posix-code-in-maintainer-script config:15 'test > -c /dev/.devfsd -o ' > I: xawtv: possible-non-posix-code-in-maintainer-script postinst:15 > 'test -c /dev/.devfsd -o -c /dev/video0 -o ' You can ignore these; they'll go

Re: RFS: xawtv (updated package)

2007-08-15 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Hi! On 8/15/07, Krzysztof Burghardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.95.dfsg.1-5 > of my package "xawtv". Uploaded. On your next revision you can verify these lintian messages: I: xawtv: possible-non-posix-code-in-maintainer-script config:15 'test -

Re: RHS: libterm-ansicolor-ruby

2007-08-15 Thread Russ Allbery
The Fungi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 12:38:07PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: >> Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > (no point in hardcoding "a few dozen string" definitions, unless one >> > _likes_ the nasty comments that people make when they read the code ;

Re: RFS: multiget

2007-08-15 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Am Mittwoch, den 15.08.2007, 23:50 +0800 schrieb LI Daobing: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "multiget". > > * Package name: multiget > Version : 1.1.4-1 > Upstream Author : liubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://multiget.sourceforge.

Re: RHS: libterm-ansicolor-ruby

2007-08-15 Thread The Fungi
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 12:38:07PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > (no point in hardcoding "a few dozen string" definitions, unless one > > _likes_ the nasty comments that people make when they read the code ;-) I took Thomas's comment to mean that it

Re: RFS: xawtv (updated package)

2007-08-15 Thread Krzysztof Burghardt
2007/8/15, Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 2007-08-15, Krzysztof Burghardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > xawtv-plugin-qt - quicktime plugin for xawtv and motv > > Has this been fixed in a way that doesn't make it segfault all the time? Yes. > And become buildable with newer libquicktime?

Re: RHS: libterm-ansicolor-ruby

2007-08-15 Thread Russ Allbery
Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > (no point in hardcoding "a few dozen string" definitions, unless one > _likes_ the nasty comments that people make when they read the code ;-) On the contrary, providing ANSI X3.64 / ECMA-048 / ISO 6429 control sequences in a library seems entirely reas

Re: unable to build gdb from source

2007-08-15 Thread Russ Allbery
Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You're apparently trying to build in "downloaded packages source/". It > contains a space which the make build system didn't handle. IMHO it's a > bug, but I suspect many package have similar problems. I supose > somebody wants to rebuild the archive

Re: RFS: xawtv (updated package)

2007-08-15 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2007-08-15, Krzysztof Burghardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > xawtv-plugin-qt - quicktime plugin for xawtv and motv Has this been fixed in a way that doesn't make it segfault all the time? And become buildable with newer libquicktime? (I was the one hacking the quicktime plugin out of the packa

Re: RHS: libterm-ansicolor-ruby

2007-08-15 Thread The Fungi
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 04:02:57PM -, Thomas Dickey wrote: [...] > (no point in hardcoding "a few dozen string" definitions, unless > one _likes_ the nasty comments that people make when they read the > code ;-) Completely agree. My point was that, when I've *needed* ANSI color and similar cap

RFS: xawtv (updated package)

2007-08-15 Thread Krzysztof Burghardt
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.95.dfsg.1-5 of my package "xawtv". It builds these binary packages: alevtd - http daemon for videotext pages fbtv - linux console (fbcon) TV application pia- movie player radio - ncurses-based radio application

Re: RFS: php-date (updated package) [UPLOADED]

2007-08-15 Thread Gregory Colpart
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 03:54:54AM +0200, Gregory Colpart wrote: > > I am Gregory Colpart [http://wiki.debian.org/GregoryColpart] > and I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.4.7-1 > of my package "php-date". This package is being adopted. This package is now sponsored/uploaded. (Thanks

Re: RHS: libterm-ansicolor-ruby

2007-08-15 Thread Thomas Dickey
The Fungi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Of course, I can't imagine an ANSI library would be anything more > than a few dozen string constant definitions, unless you wanted man tput (no point in hardcoding "a few dozen string" definitions, unless one _likes_ the nasty comments that people make whe

Re: RHS: libterm-ansicolor-ruby

2007-08-15 Thread Thomas Dickey
Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > curses does only full-screen display, and is useless for anything > line-based. And being capable of colouring your display is a MAJOR thing if > you want to be able to read text quickly. man filter -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp:

Re: RFS: qink (updated package)

2007-08-15 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Hi, I don't mind about the other changes ;) Thanks a lot. Nelson A. de Oliveira a écrit : Hi! On 8/15/07, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.1-2 of my package "qink". Uploaded. I hope that you don't mind about this

Re: RFS: qink (updated package)

2007-08-15 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Hi! On 8/15/07, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.1-2 > of my package "qink". Uploaded. I hope that you don't mind about this: diff -urN debian/changelog qink-0.3.1/debian/changelog --- debian/changelog2007-08-15 13:19:46

RFS: llk-linux

2007-08-15 Thread LI Daobing
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "llk-linux". * Package name: llk-linux Version : 2.3~beta1-1 Upstream Author : Zhao Mingxian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/llk-linux * License : GPLv2 Section : game

Re: unable to build gdb from source

2007-08-15 Thread Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
Raphael Geissert wrote: > You should fill a bug against the cdbs package; and if you can't wait > for the maintainer to patch it then build it from a directory which > doesn't have spaces in its name. > I filed it as http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=438141 raju -- Kamaraju S Ku

RFS: multiget

2007-08-15 Thread LI Daobing
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "multiget". * Package name: multiget Version : 1.1.4-1 Upstream Author : liubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://multiget.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Section : net It builds these binary

Re: unable to build gdb from source

2007-08-15 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 10:46:29AM -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: > Can some one tell me what I am doing wrong here? I am unable to build gdb > from source on a machine running sid. I did > > $apt-get source gdb > $cd gdb-6.6.dfsg/ > $ dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -rfakeroot > > The build log i

RFS: gviterm

2007-08-15 Thread LI Daobing
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gviterm". * Package name: gviterm Version : 0.1+r10-1 Upstream Author : yetist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://code.google.com/p/gviterm/ * License : GPL Section : editors It builds these bi

Re: unable to build gdb from source

2007-08-15 Thread Raphael Geissert
On 15/08/07, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can some one tell me what I am doing wrong here? I am unable to build gdb > from source on a machine running sid. I did > > $apt-get source gdb > $cd gdb-6.6.dfsg/ > $ dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -rfakeroot > > The build log is attached

Re: unable to build gdb from source

2007-08-15 Thread Darren Salt
I demand that Kamaraju S Kusumanchi may or may not have written... > Can some one tell me what I am doing wrong here? I am unable to build gdb > from source on a machine running sid. I did > $apt-get source gdb > $cd gdb-6.6.dfsg/ > $ dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -rfakeroot > The build log is attac

unable to build gdb from source

2007-08-15 Thread Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
Can some one tell me what I am doing wrong here? I am unable to build gdb from source on a machine running sid. I did $apt-get source gdb $cd gdb-6.6.dfsg/ $ dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -rfakeroot The build log is attached in this email. What puzzles me is that, according to http://buildd.debian.or

RHS: libnet-tftp-ruby

2007-08-15 Thread Deepak Tripathi
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libnet-tftp-ruby". * Package name: libnet-tftp-ruby Version : 0.1.0-1 Upstream Author :Guillaume Marcais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://rubyforge.org/projects/net-tftp/ * License : GPL Section

RFS: qink (updated package)

2007-08-15 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.1-2 of my package "qink". It builds these binary packages: qink - Simple printer ink level monitor based on libinklevel and Qt4 The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 437857 The package ca

RFS: oggconvert (updated package)

2007-08-15 Thread Luca Falavigna
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.1.1-2 of my package "oggconvert". It builds these binary packages: oggconvert - Convert media files to free formats The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 437964 The package can be found on ment

Re: RFS: audtty

2007-08-15 Thread Chris Taylor
> The package does not build for me. It fails with: Unmet build > dependencies: automake. I have automake1.4 and automake1.7 > specifically installed. Once I installed the virtual automake (which > provides automake 1.10), it then built o.k. You may want to specify > automake1.10 specifically as a