On 3/15/07, Craig Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 10:41:25PM +0300, Thierry Randrianiriana wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.6.18-1
> of my package "smarty".
Found one yet? If not I'll do this and the -doc
not yet ,
thanks!
- Craig
--
Craig
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 10:41:25PM +0300, Thierry Randrianiriana wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.6.18-1
> of my package "smarty".
Found one yet? If not I'll do this and the -doc
- Craig
--
Craig Small GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5
http:/
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 08:23:46PM -0400, Muammar Wadih El Khatib Rodriguez
wrote:
> I uploaded a new upstream version of a package which is called CEGUI
> (I did it two months ago). There is another package which depends on
> CEGUI to autobuild, this package is ogre. The problem is that ogre's
>
Hi *,
I uploaded a new upstream version of a package which is called CEGUI
(I did it two months ago). There is another package which depends on
CEGUI to autobuild, this package is ogre. The problem is that ogre's
version in Debian is too old and that's why it is not autobuilding
well against the
I sent the following message to my sponsor, but haven't heard back yet.
I welcome any assistance anyone can provide.
Thanks,
Richard
> On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 12:06 +, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > rejected, you missed to mention the difference of the license in help/*
> > Also you need to find out
On (14/03/07 22:04), Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le mercredi 14 mars 2007 21:49, Matthew Johnson a écrit :
> > Is this enough confermation?
>
> No, I fear no..
> If I look at the header at file rmd160.c, I get:
>
> Nowhere in this header I can find anything granting right to modify the code.
> Furthe
Le mercredi 14 mars 2007 21:49, Matthew Johnson a écrit :
> Is this enough confermation?
No, I fear no..
If I look at the header at file rmd160.c, I get:
/\
*
* FILE: rmd160.c
*
* CONTENTS: A sample C-implementat
Is this enough confermation?
Matt
- Forwarded message from Markus Kuhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
To: Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: OTPW
From: Markus Kuhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It says GPL on
http://freshmeat.net/projects/otpw/
so must be true ... ;-) That was the inte
Le mercredi 14 mars 2007 19:00, vous avez écrit :
> Does Debian _actually_ require licence information to be added to every
> file? As an upstream I would consider that unreasonable when I have
> clearly given the licence elsewhere. If not, what would be sufficient?
> Must all upstreams be asked wh
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 06:44:43PM +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> > > * IMPORTANT: Licence is stated only in the html document... You may ask
> > > upstream to include at least a LICENCE or COPYING file, and better add
> > > the licence to each headers in code files...
> >
> > This is all upstrea
Le mercredi 14 mars 2007 17:47, Matthew Johnson a écrit :
> > * libotpw-dev: Is it mandatory that you ship only a static library ?
>
> This is consistent with libopie-dev. Upstream doesn't produce a dynamic
> library but merely recommends compiling with the .o files directly.
>
> > * You call dh_in
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:51:16 +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
you describe here I am not sure how this program
> differ from libpam-opie, opie-client and opie-server which
> are already in Debian.
> What are the differences?
> Kind regards
> Nico
OTPW is easier to use if you can't/don't want to use a ha
Hi Matthew,
* Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-14 16:50]:
> Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package otpw.
>
> Package name: otpw
> Version : 1.3
> Upstream Author : Markus Kuhn
> * URL : http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/download/otpw-1.3.tar.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 05:14:50PM +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le mercredi 14 mars 2007 16:27, Matthew Johnson a écrit :
> > Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package otpw.
>
> Few remarks concerning your package:
Thanks (-:
> * libotpw-dev: Is it mandatory that you ship only
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:14:50 +0100
Romain Beauxis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Again, I for myself recommend cdbs for simple packages since you are
> then sure not to forgot any dh_* call (yes, I know you may call
> uneeded ones but...) and reduce your rule only to the relevant
> parts... But this
Le mercredi 14 mars 2007 16:27, Matthew Johnson a écrit :
> Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package otpw.
Hi !
Few remarks concerning your package:
* libotpw-dev: Is it mandatory that you ship only a static library ?
* You call dh_installman but in fact you install manua
Hi,
I'm looking for a sponsor for the eqonomize package. The description is:
Eqonomize! is a personal accounting software, with focus on efficiency
and ease of use for the small household economy. Eqonomize! provides a
complete solution, with bookkeeping by double entry and support for
schedu
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package otpw.
Package name: otpw
Version : 1.3
Upstream Author : Markus Kuhn
* URL : http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/download/otpw-1.3.tar.gz
* License : GPL2
Description : A One-time password system for PAM
Le mercredi 14 mars 2007 13:22, Deepak Kumar Tripathi a écrit :
> Hello,
Hi !
> I'm looking a sponsor for update a new version of libqt-perl
>
> Package Name: libqt-perl
> Short description: Perl bindings for the Qt library
> URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libqt-pe
Am Sonntag, 11. März 2007 schrieb Ricardo Mones:
> On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 09:34:56 +0100
>
> Roman Müllenschläder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 23. Januar 2007 schrieben Sie:
> > > > I filed the ITP and it was accepted as:
> > > > -
> > > > Bug#408099: ITP: mms -- My Media System - a com
Hello,
I'm looking a sponsor for update a new version of libqt-perl
Package Name: libqt-perl
Short description: Perl bindings for the Qt library
URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libqt-perl
Deepak Tripathi
Open Source Developer
.''`.
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 10:15:31 +0100
Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reason I want to mark this in a computer-readable way (as opposed
> to a textual message to the report), is that that would allow
> programs to present lists of "fixable" bugs in a better way.
> Whenever I see lists of
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.20-1
of my package "fslint".
It builds these binary packages:
fslint - A utility to fix problems with filesystems' data, like duplicate
files
The package is lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:38:00AM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 11:34:05AM +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:15:31AM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > > I have a bug (#406121), which I don't want to fix before the release (it's
> > > minor). Is there a way
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 11:34:05AM +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:15:31AM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > I have a bug (#406121), which I don't want to fix before the release (it's
> > minor). Is there a way to tag it as such? Or should I just add a message
> > to the report
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:15:31AM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> Hello mentors,
>
> I have a bug (#406121), which I don't want to fix before the release (it's
> minor). Is there a way to tag it as such? Or should I just add a message to
> the report (I just did) and do nothing else?
>
> I'm just t
Hello mentors,
I have a bug (#406121), which I don't want to fix before the release (it's
minor). Is there a way to tag it as such? Or should I just add a message to
the report (I just did) and do nothing else?
I'm just thinking that I could mark it as blocked by some Etch-release
pseudo-bug (w
27 matches
Mail list logo
