Re: packages for netcdf 3.6.2 (released today)

2007-03-07 Thread Warren Turkal
On Wednesday 07 March 2007 17:47, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: > 1) I have to tell you that I made an error in the clean target I > > suggested for debian/rules: > >   for file in netcdf-c netcdf-cxx netcdf-f77 netcdf-f90 \ > >   netcdf-install netcdf-tutorial netcdf ; do \ > >  

Re: packages for netcdf 3.6.2 (released today)

2007-03-07 Thread Warren Turkal
On Wednesday 07 March 2007 17:47, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: > * possibility to build an arch:all documentation package The maintainer is encouraging the use of the pre-built docs instead of building them from the texinfo sources. Would there be an issue with doing that? > * whether or not this is

Re: packages for netcdf 3.6.2 (released today)

2007-03-07 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
Hi Warren, Thanks for making all the suggested changes in -1~pre3. Other than the following 3 points, the packages look good. 1) I have to tell you that I made an error in the clean target I suggested for debian/rules: > for file in netcdf-c netcdf-cxx netcdf-f77 netcdf-f90 \ >

Re: packages for netcdf 3.6.2 (released today)

2007-03-07 Thread Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 02:51:06PM -0700, Warren Turkal wrote: > > * I'm not sure the BTS is smart enough to close #278739 that appears > > with a newline between it and "closes:". (If I'm wrong, someone please > > correct me.) > > Done, but does anyone know if BTS is smart enough to handle this?

Can't include orig file

2007-03-07 Thread Luca Bedogni
Hi mentors i'm working on my new package but i have a problem in building the package including the orig file. I had my package with my files modified under debian/, and when i try to dpkg-buildpackage it says: dpkg-source: building krecordmydesktop using existing krecordmydesktop_0.1~a

Re: packages for netcdf 3.6.2 (released today)

2007-03-07 Thread Warren Turkal
On Wednesday 07 March 2007 00:09, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: > debian/README.Debian: > > * nothing substantive in here so probably this file should be deleted. done > debian/changelog: > > * Please close the ITA bug (#321336) in your changelog entry. done > * Please merge in the changelog entries

Re: VMware Player packages

2007-03-07 Thread Marc Haber
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 06:46:18PM +0100, Hans Kratz wrote: > Sure. I wasn't aware of that package. AFAICS that package handles only > the VMware kernel modules right now. No, it can build vmware-player .debs as well. I'll fix the wrong description in svn. Greetings Marc --

Re: VMware Player packages

2007-03-07 Thread Hans Kratz
Hi! HK> After repeatedly seeing interest in VMware Player packages for HK> Debian I decided to post my work on packaging VMware Player. It HK> should work fine on sarge and sid. Currently only i386 is HK> supported, support for x86-64 is on my TODO list. That was supposed to read *etch* an

Re: VMware Player packages

2007-03-07 Thread Mikhail Gusarov
Twas brillig at 12:27:07 when Hans Kratz did gyre and gimble: HK> After repeatedly seeing interest in VMware Player packages for HK> Debian I decided to post my work on packaging VMware Player. It HK> should work fine on sarge and sid. Currently only i386 is HK> supported, support for x86-64

VMware Player packages

2007-03-07 Thread Hans Kratz
Hi! After repeatedly seeing interest in VMware Player packages for Debian I decided to post my work on packaging VMware Player. It should work fine on sarge and sid. Currently only i386 is supported, support for x86-64 is on my TODO list. Licensing and distribution: The VMware Player EULA does

Re: RFS: gpodder

2007-03-07 Thread David Watson
On Wednesday 07 March 2007 00:24:27 Thomas Perl wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gpodder". > > gPodder is a podcast receiver/catcher. You can subscribe to RSS > feeds (Podcasts) and download audio/video content from different > channels. You can then playback co

Re: RFS: docbook-xsl 1.72.0.dfsg.1-1 and docbook2x 0.8.7-1

2007-03-07 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 09:49:42PM +0100, Daniel Leidert a écrit : > > I'm currently writing a make-snippet to be included into debian/rules Hi Daniel, I would be definitely interested by such a snippet. I package in a field in which manpages are a very rare thing, which means that I have to wri