Hi all! I currently maintain aspell-tl and itagalog. Both of these packages
are based from one source package which is ispell-tl. I decided that it would
be better to split the source and put debian/* into each package. My question
is how is debian/changelog going to be managed after the split? S
---
FROM FILA wants to stay in better touch using some of Google's coolest new
products.
If you already have Gmail or Google Talk, visit:
http://mail.google.com/mail/b-37bef5085b-29c3ca9bfb-537534854aceb2a5
You'll need to click
Hi, Andrew, Daniel and other mentors.
On Feb 21 2007, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> On 2/21/07, Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >rarewares.org implies, that there is something wrong with these
> >packages. do they break copyrights or patents? Maybe they are a
> >candidate for http://alioth
On Jan 14 2007, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> I think Daniel's quality standards are not exceptionally high, or low,
> compared to other sponsors. That is, if you don't consider a newline
> in a textfile a quality measure of course.
But the other comments he makes, regarding: proper attribution of
copy
On Jan 14 2007, Muammar Wadih El Khatib Rodriguez wrote:
> In the other hand I don't think he has something to change, I really
> do appreciate all the work he does and how he does. He imposes a high
> quality standard when he sponsors a package.
And this is what sets Debian apart from other distr
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 03:00:07PM +0100, Matej Kosik wrote:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pict".
>
> Have you read the OCaml packaging policy available in
> /usr/share/doc/ocaml/ocaml_packaging_policy.txt.gz (ocaml package)?
> Being a program implemente
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 04:43:37AM -0200, Rogério Brito wrote:
[snip]
> Please let me know what you think. I am looking for constructive
> criticism and since this pair of packages actually contain a library
> (which I am not used to packaging), I would welcome any comments.
>
> Other comments are
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 03:00:07PM +0100, Matej Kosik wrote:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pict".
>
> Have you read the OCaml packaging policy available in
> /usr/share/doc/ocaml/ocaml_packaging_policy.txt.gz (ocaml package)?
> Being a program implemente
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 03:00:07PM +0100, Matej Kosik wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pict".
Have you read the OCaml packaging policy available in
/usr/share/doc/ocaml/ocaml_packaging_policy.txt.gz (ocaml package)?
Being a program implemented in OCaml it should obey to it.
I'm
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pict".
* Package name: pict
* Version: 4.1.0-1
* Upstream Authors: Benjamin C. Pierce
David N. Turner
* URL:
http://altair.dcs.elf.stuba.sk/~kosik/debian/pool/main/p/pict/pict_4.1.0-1.dsc
* Description: Compiler of the Pict programmin
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "noscript".
* Package name: noscript
Version : 1.1.4.5.061221-1
Upstream Author : Giorgio Maone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://noscript.net
* License : GPL
Section : web
It builds these binary packages:
nosc
Hi Tim,
> It builds these binary packages:
> debian-sec - debian-sec packages
> security-client - debian-sec protocol specific client packages
> security-develop - debian-sec tool and exploit development packages
> security-emulate - debian-sec host emulation packages
> security-encrypt - debian-s
On 2/21/07, Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rogério Brito wrote:
> Anyway, I'm looking for comments on some tuned Ogg Vorbis packages
> (Aoyumi Tuned Vorbis encoder), packaged by Mike Gan, from
> rarewares.org.
rarewares.org implies, that there is something wrong with these
packages. d
Rogério Brito wrote:
> Anyway, I'm looking for comments on some tuned Ogg Vorbis packages
> (Aoyumi Tuned Vorbis encoder), packaged by Mike Gan, from
> rarewares.org.
rarewares.org implies, that there is something wrong with these
packages. do they break copyrights or patents? Maybe they are a
can
14 matches
Mail list logo
