On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 07:21:51AM +0100, Johann Rudloff wrote:
> I hope it's correct now, but I've one little question:
>
> > * your build-depends are wrong. you depend on libgtk2.0-0 instead of
> > libgtk2.0-dev and libglib2.0-dev
> I added both, but is the dependency on libglib2.0-dev rea
Hi,
I hope it's correct now, but I've one little question:
> * your build-depends are wrong. you depend on libgtk2.0-0 instead of
> libgtk2.0-dev and libglib2.0-dev
I added both, but is the dependency on libglib2.0-dev really neccessary?
Since libgtk2.0-dev depends on it, I think that depen
few notes on what I spot
since first thing of all was to check copyright file -- there seems to
be a copyright holder missing for the software itself.
there is no sense to keep config.log in .diff -- employ proper clean
procedure in debian/rules (may be the other .log files as well can
be clean
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > I started packaging (with the help of the web and some maintainers of VDR)
> > but
> > am new to packaging at all ;)
> >...<
> Please send the URL to your source package's .dsc file so I can have a
> look at it.
seems to be online
htt
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 09:27:27AM +0100, Roman Müllenschläder wrote:
> For over 3 years now I help out on a multimedia-project named MMS
> ... we realy would like to see it as part of debian, as we think it's stable,
> tested and well documented.
>
> I started packaging (with the help of the we
Johann Rudloff wrote:
> Yes, it is.
good :)
> I fixed the things you mentioned and uploaded the new package to
> mentors.debian.net:
good, but please do also these additional things here:
* your build-depends are wrong. you depend on libgtk2.0-0 instead of
libgtk2.0-dev and libglib2.0-dev
Hi,
> Chris Bannister wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gexec".
>
> Hi,
>
> is this still the case?
Yes, it is.
I fixed the things you mentioned and uploaded the new package to
mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gexec
- Source repository
Daniel Baumann schrieb:
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Thanks for all your good tips! I'm sorry, this is my first package :)
welcome :)
I fixed it and uploaded it again to mentors as 0.2-1.
good, uploaded.
if you need/want further sponsoring, contact me off-list:
http://people.debian.org/~daniel/
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 19:52, Jari Aalto wrote:
> As to comes to removing "# dh_*" comments we agree to disagree on
> this. I have no problem with
[name omitted]
> considering that a "good
> practice", but I hope that all understad that developers may have
> other views that may be equally v
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Thanks for all your good tips! I'm sorry, this is my first package :)
welcome :)
> I fixed it and uploaded it again to mentors as 0.2-1.
good, uploaded.
if you need/want further sponsoring, contact me off-list:
http://people.debian.org/~daniel/documents/sponsoring.html#
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>> If you take a look at some other sponsors,
>> you will see that if they have some criticism on a package, they will
>> often include *why* it is a problem, and/or how to solve it. This
>> doesn't have to be long.
>
> this would
Dear Debian Developers, Mentors, Womens, Contributors and Users,
first of all Happy new Year and may this new year bring us many new ideas
and continuing best GNU/Linux distribution of the world.
Now, some of you know me already and for those who do not know me:
My Name is Michelle Konzack, I am
Daniel Baumann schrieb:
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
I hope it's now all better, I tried to fix all your tips.
there are a few things left:
* if the package was not previously available in a repository where
users could have installed it, we normally upload the first package
with revision
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 17:09:45 +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
> hi
>
>
> (CC: to d-mentors : I need some help here)
>
>
> Steve Langasek ha scritto:
> > I think in conclusion I would prefer t-p-u for this.
>
> I tried it ;
> I uploaded a package (using dput) ;
> the first line in debian/changelo
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt ha scritto:
> It's -update*s*.
:->
I was thinking about an exoteric explanation,
kinda I had uploaded into the wrong queue ...
:->
---
thanks Marc and Max :-)
a.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
A Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Steve Langasek ha scritto:
>> I think in conclusion I would prefer t-p-u for this.
> I tried it ;
> I uploaded a package (using dput) ;
> the first line in debian/changelog was
> gpr (0.11deb.etch1) testing-proposed-update; urgency=low
It's -update*s*.
Ma
Am Dienstag, den 16 Januar hub A Mennucc folgendes in die Tasten:
Hi!
> I tried it ;
> I uploaded a package (using dput) ;
> the first line in debian/changelog was
> gpr (0.11deb.etch1) testing-proposed-update; urgency=low
~~~
The dist is called 'testin
hi
(CC: to d-mentors : I need some help here)
Steve Langasek ha scritto:
> I think in conclusion I would prefer t-p-u for this.
I tried it ;
I uploaded a package (using dput) ;
the first line in debian/changelog was
gpr (0.11deb.etch1) testing-proposed-update; urgency=low
but I got this er
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> I hope it's now all better, I tried to fix all your tips.
there are a few things left:
* if the package was not previously available in a repository where
users could have installed it, we normally upload the first package
with revision -1. you have revision -5.
19 matches
Mail list logo
