Re: When is the Freeze of Etch?

2006-10-13 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Michelle Konzack wrote: > I have this question, since some of my applications do not work > under Etch/Sid because missing updates from some Packages. > > For example: xdialog 2.3 is availlable since 4 monto and in Debian > it is only 2.2 which has MANY bugs, which are solve

RFC: ipw3945-daemon

2006-10-13 Thread Jurij Smakov
Hi, I have prepared the ipw3945-daemon package, following the ITP 391686. The debian subdirectory can be found in kernel team's svn repo at svn://svn.debian.org/svn/kernel/people/jurij/ipw3945-daemon The source and binary packages for i386 are available at http://www.wooyd.org/debian/ipw3945-d

Re: RFS: ipkungfu (updated package)

2006-10-13 Thread Luis Uribe
Hi Erik On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 09:35:41PM +0200, Erik Schanze wrote: > I intend to sponsor your package, but there are some things to do: > [ ... ] Thank you so much, i'm gonna fix it and uploading again. Cheers :). -- Luis http://eviled.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: ipkungfu (updated package)

2006-10-13 Thread Erik Schanze
Hello Luis, Luis Uribe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.2-8 > of the package "ipkungfu". > I intend to sponsor your package, but there are some things to do: - debian/rules build a manpage in build/ipkungfu.8, but you install your own manpage debian/ipkun

Re: When is the Freeze of Etch?

2006-10-13 Thread Thibaut Paumard
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:00:20 +0200 Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello *, > > sorry if I ask here but when is the freeze of Etch? It was supposed to be on October, 18th but Andreas Barth announced it would be delayed by a few days. T. -- Dr Thibaut Paumard | LESIA - B.

want to adopt craft

2006-10-13 Thread Arvind kumar
I searched the list of package available for adoption. I am interested in adopting craft package. But I need little help from Mr Hueffner for some time

Re: When is the Freeze of Etch?

2006-10-13 Thread Daniel Baumann
Michelle Konzack wrote: > Since I have packed 2.3 for my own, using the /debian directory > from 2.2 should I upload my xdialog to mentors and ask for a NMU? New upstream release does not justify an NMU. Especially not, if the person is not MIA. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrass

Re: binNMU safe and ${binary:Version} or ${source:Version}

2006-10-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 04:13:07AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:11:23 -0700 Steve Langasek wrote: > > The documentation for this probably belongs in debian-policy; current > > versions of policy seem to mention Source-Version, though, not the new > > substvars, and I'm not s

Re: When is the Freeze of Etch?

2006-10-13 Thread Andreas Barth
* Michelle Konzack ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061013 18:12]: > sorry if I ask here but when is the freeze of Etch? When it is ready. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED

When is the Freeze of Etch?

2006-10-13 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello *, sorry if I ask here but when is the freeze of Etch? I have this question, since some of my applications do not work under Etch/Sid because missing updates from some Packages. For example: xdialog 2.3 is availlable since 4 monto and in Debian it is only 2.2 which has MANY bugs, which ar

Re: RFS: engauge-digitizer

2006-10-13 Thread Tobias Richter
Dear mentors, packaging improved a bit, most importantly the ~5MB of useful documentation was split into a package separate from the ~0.4MB program binary. Also lintian now quietly ignores the upstream packaging (CVS dirs), so everything is in good shape as pbuilder nicely creates the .debs, to

Re: binNMU safe and ${binary:Version} or ${source:Version}

2006-10-13 Thread Guillem Jover
[ Found this today on the web archives. ] Hi, On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:11:23 -0700 Steve Langasek wrote: > The documentation for this probably belongs in debian-policy; current > versions of policy seem to mention Source-Version, though, not the new > substvars, and I'm not sure if anyone has submi