I will consider that next package, thanks :).
The error Ted mentioned ended up being the problem I had, so thanks all.
Martin
Michael Biebl wrote:
Ted Percival wrote:
Martin Kelly wrote:
After trying to build my package (pyecm), I recieved the following error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Desktop/py
Ted Percival wrote:
> Martin Kelly wrote:
>> After trying to build my package (pyecm), I recieved the following error:
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Desktop/pyecm-0.1$ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
>> parsechangelog/debian: error: badly formatted trailer line, at file
>> debian/changelog line 5
>> dpkg-
Le mardi 10 octobre 2006 01:17, Daniel Baumann a écrit :
> Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
> > Happy birthday to her :)
>
> I'll tell her :)
>
> > I fixed the clean rule but I don't understand this issue. When I built my
> > package, these Makefile were cleaned but they're not in a pbuilder.
> > Weird
Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
> Happy birthday to her :)
I'll tell her :)
> I fixed the clean rule but I don't understand this issue. When I built my
> package, these Makefile were cleaned but they're not in a pbuilder.
> Weird, but fixed btw.
fine.
> Re-uploaded to mentors ;-)
uploaded to deb
Le lundi 9 octobre 2006 22:55, Daniel Baumann a écrit :
> Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
> > I'm back. Did you look at the new package?
>
> Was away, it was my sisters birthday :) However, looked again at the
> package, except from the fact that your clean rule is not clean, it's
> fine (there should
Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
> I'm back. Did you look at the new package?
Was away, it was my sisters birthday :) However, looked again at the
package, except from the fact that your clean rule is not clean, it's
fine (there should not be any Makefiles in the diff.gz, the're
autogenerated here). P
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pfn".
* Package name: pfn
Version : 2.3.1-1
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://pfn.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPLv2
Section : web
It builds these binary packages:
pfn
I'm getting the following linda error:
linda -i ../result/keytouch_2.2.2-1_i386.changes
E: keytouch; Package contains autoconf-generated files.
The package contains the file shown above, which is generated by
autoconf. This may confuse the buildd's, and should be removed by the
clean target of
Hi,
Székelyi Szabolcs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The soversion is usually added to the -dev package name to be able to
> support multiple versions of a library off-line, which means all
> versions can be found in the archive, but only one can be installed on
> the user's machine. The question i
Le lundi 9 octobre 2006 16:09, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) a écrit :
> Le lundi 9 octobre 2006 15:23, Daniel Baumann a écrit :
> > Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
> > >> audacious-locales is only interesting, if you don't want the
> > >> additional locales installed, but it is unpacked only 1.5mb, not
> > >
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> good, uploaded.
>
> if you want/need further updates, write me a private mail.
Excellent! Thanks!
--
KBK
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Le lundi 9 octobre 2006 15:23, Daniel Baumann a écrit :
> Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
> >> audacious-locales is only interesting, if you don't want the additional
> >> locales installed, but it is unpacked only 1.5mb, not worthwile, include
> >> that into audacious. splitted out locales is only wo
Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
>> audacious-locales is only interesting, if you don't want the additional
>> locales installed, but it is unpacked only 1.5mb, not worthwile, include
>> that into audacious. splitted out locales is only worthwile for some
>> real large programs like openoffice.org, moz
Le lundi 9 octobre 2006 14:57, Daniel Baumann a écrit :
> Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
> > I don't understand why I should do that. What's the problem ?
>
> currently, you have:
>
> audacious
> libaudacious3-dev
> libaudacious3
> audacious-plugins
> audacious-plugins-extra
> audacious-locales
> aud
Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
> I don't understand why I should do that. What's the problem ?
currently, you have:
audacious
libaudacious3-dev
libaudacious3
audacious-plugins
audacious-plugins-extra
audacious-locales
audacious-common
whereas:
audacious-common is only interesting for BinNMUs, bu
Le lundi 9 octobre 2006 14:19, Daniel Baumann a écrit :
> Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
> >> * the package suffers heavily micro-packaging, please do only
> >> audacious, libaudacious3 and libaudacious-dev.
> >
> > I don't like this idea. Merging all plugins into audacious will add tones
> > o
Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
>> * the package suffers heavily micro-packaging, please do only
>> audacious, libaudacious3 and libaudacious-dev.
>
> I don't like this idea. Merging all plugins into audacious will add tones of
> dependencies. I don't think most of users wants to read xm files
Le lundi 9 octobre 2006 14:05, Daniel Baumann a écrit :
> Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
> > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
>
> Last time when you asked for sponsorship, I said I'll do it. Then, my
> father died, so I was busy with reallife. Now, I'm back :)
>
> So, I had a
Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Last time when you asked for sponsorship, I said I'll do it. Then, my
father died, so I was busy with reallife. Now, I'm back :)
So, I had a look at your package now. It is ok, except:
* your clean: is uncl
Hello,
I make download source proftpd.
I run the debian/proftpd.config and the dialog message
happen. When I try run again come this error :
debconf: field template unknown'_choices', na stanza
#1 de ./debian/proftpd.templates
debconf: field template unknown '_default', na stanza
#1 de ./debian/
Kurt B. Kaiser wrote:
> All three done, thanks.
good, uploaded.
if you want/need further updates, write me a private mail.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "engauge-digitizer".
* Package name: engauge-digitizer
Version : 3.0-1
Upstream Author : Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://digitizer.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPLv2
Section : sc
Le lundi 9 octobre 2006 07:50, Mario Iseli a écrit :
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 02:51:05AM +0200, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
> > Dear mentors,
>
> Hello Adam,
>
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "audacious".
>
> I will do that, this afternoon I will have a look at the package and
> the
23 matches
Mail list logo
