Sandro Tosi wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.04-18
> of my package "wmspaceweather".
sponsored
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jlhafrontend".
* Package name: jlhafrontend
Version : 0.1.3-1
Upstream Author : Ying-Chun Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/jlhafrontend/
* License : Cryptix General License
Dear all,
I am preparing the package of a software which provides regression tests
in a separate directory, for which there is no "make clean" available.
For the moment, I copy the directory somewhere else, perform the tests
in (it generates many files), and delete the directory in debian/rules
cl
"Toni Mueller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Sun, 03.09.2006 at 19:45:23 +0300, George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Sunday 03 September 2006 19:18, Toni Mueller wrote:
> another question is whether we can possibly adapt the policy and tools
> to
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please don't hijack threads. If you wish to start a new thread, click 'new
message' rather than replying to an existing message and changing the
subject.
- Matt
On 9/4/06, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 01:43:32AM +, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> Is anyone interested in sponsoring this package? I'm happy to fix any
> problems and I'm in close contact with upstream.
>
> (VoIP team cc'd, maybe this would interest you guys)
Hi mentors,
some days have passed since this RFS, and I still don't know what to do...
As per email come:
1. erf.c has a license BSD-like
2. BSD licenses are DFSG-compatible
3. BSD-with-4-clause could lead to issues combining that code with
GPL-ed one (as main of the rest of the code)
So, what
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "audacious".
* Package name: audacious
Version : 1.1.2-1
Upstream Author : George Averill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Giacomo Lozito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Adam,
audacious - Small and fast audio player which supports lots of audio
formats
audacious-common - Small and fast audio player which supports lots of
audio formats
audacious-locales - Small and fast audio player which supports lots of
audio formats
audacious-plugins - Small and fast audio
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "museek+".
* Package name : museek+
Version : 0.1.11-1
Upstream Author : "Hyriand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Daelstorm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"SeeSchloss" <[E
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "audacious".
* Package name: audacious
Version : 1.1.2-1
Upstream Author : George Averill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Giacomo Lozito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
William Pitcoc
Toni Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 03.09.2006 at 19:04:49 +0300, George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> On Sunday 03 September 2006 17:10, Eric Cooper wrote:
>>
>>> (I don't think I can justify asking upstream to publish a more
>>> wasteful version of the same bits on his webs
On Sunday 03 September 2006 16:10, Francesco Namuri wrote:
> thanks very much for sponsorship... :)
You're welcome.
> It's strange because I have the desktop entry in debian menu and in
> KDE/gnome menus too, I have purged and reinstalled many times the
> package to verify this... Now I check if
Eric Cooper wrote:
> The upstream tarball for a package I maintain is in .tar.bz2 format.
> I've been downloading it and recompressing it into .tar.gz format.
> This seems like a very common situation.
...FWIW, my opinion to that:
http://people.debian.org/~daniel/documents/packaging.html#package-f
On Sun September 3 2006 08:10, Francesco Namuri wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 03:24:43PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > Just that I still don't get an icon in the menus anywhere. Perhaps
> > the desktop file needs to contain "Categories=KDE;Network" but I'm
> > not sure. Whether desktop files
On Sunday 03 September 2006 18:30, Kurt B. Kaiser wrote:
> Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Please run lintian on the package. I get three errors here.
>
> Yes, I see that also. However, I'm trying to follow the directive in
> the Developer's Reference 5.8.5.3:
>
> "Do NOT include an
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.04-18
of my package "wmspaceweather".
It builds these binary packages:
wmspaceweather - WindowMaker dock app that shows the "weather" in space
The package is lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 354963
The package can b
"Andrew Donnellan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What does this do that python-xmms/pyxmms does not do?
>
> Maybe this might just be a *standalone application* rather than a library?
The standalone application corresponding to (and relying on) PyXMMS is
PyXMMS-remote (found in the pyxmms-remote D
Hi,
On Sun, 03.09.2006 at 19:45:23 +0300, George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 03 September 2006 19:18, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > another question is whether we can possibly adapt the policy and tools
> > to directly allow .bz2 files in Debian - we would benefit from smaller
> > fi
On Sunday 03 September 2006 19:18, Toni Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 03.09.2006 at 19:04:49 +0300, George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > On Sunday 03 September 2006 17:10, Eric Cooper wrote:
> > > (I don't think I can justify asking upstream to publish a more
> > > wasteful version of
Hi,
On Sun, 03.09.2006 at 19:04:49 +0300, George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 03 September 2006 17:10, Eric Cooper wrote:
> > (I don't think I can justify asking upstream to publish a more
> > wasteful version of the same bits on his website just to suit Debian.)
>
> True.
an
Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please run lintian on the package. I get three errors here.
Yes, I see that also. However, I'm trying to follow the directive in
the Developer's Reference 5.8.5.3:
"Do NOT include any changes in your package which are not directly
related to fixing t
On Sunday 03 September 2006 17:10, Eric Cooper wrote:
> The upstream tarball for a package I maintain is in .tar.bz2 format.
> I've been downloading it and recompressing it into .tar.gz format.
> This seems like a very common situation.
>
> 1. Should I still follow the section on "best practices f
Hi Tony,
On 9/1/06, tony mancill wrote:
As I understand it, you're supposed to be checking in the state of the
package in the build directory, and if the debian diff removed one of those
files, then that's ok.
It seemed a good solution, but for the package in exam
(wmspaceweather) I've found n
On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 10:10 -0400, Eric Cooper wrote:
> The upstream tarball for a package I maintain is in .tar.bz2 format.
> I've been downloading it and recompressing it into .tar.gz format.
> This seems like a very common situation.
Yes very common.
>
> 1. Should I still follow the section
Francesco Namuri wrote:
> Rejected: lopster_1.2.2-3.dsc refers to lopster_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz, but I
> can't find it in the queue or in the pool.
>
> maybe I have made a mistake updating debian revision?
Someone has probably uploaded the -3 version of the package but without
the orig.tar.gz which w
Thanks for the first upload!
On 2006-09-02 at 21:13:43 +0200, Tobias Klauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2006-09-02 at 19:19:43 +0200, Tobias Klauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > OK. I'll make a package with a new snapshot then. With the benefit that
> > there needn't be a debian/patches.
>
The upstream tarball for a package I maintain is in .tar.bz2 format.
I've been downloading it and recompressing it into .tar.gz format.
This seems like a very common situation.
1. Should I still follow the section on "best practices for
.orig.tar.gz files" in the Developer's Reference, and includ
Hi Christoph,
thanks very much for sponsorship... :)
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 03:24:43PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> Just that I still don't get an icon in the menus anywhere. Perhaps the
> desktop file needs to contain "Categories=KDE;Network" but I'm not sure.
> Whether desktop files work o
On Sunday 03 September 2006 12:33, Francesco Namuri wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 09:20:48AM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > But please do not put them into the upstream's directory.
>
> Fixed, :)
> now everything is in debian/ directory, and the patch of src/log.c is
> made using dpatch.
Yes,
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 05:16:13 +0200
"Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on Museek+ packaging and I have a problem.
> There is an arch dependent file in python-museekd (mucipher.so) and it
> should be built for python2.4 and 2.3.
>
> But the package doesn't inc
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lisaac".
* Package name: lisaac
Version : 0.84-1
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://isaacos.loria.fr/li.html
* License : Cecillv2 (compatible GPL)
http://www.cecill.info/licences/Licence
Hello Christoph,
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 09:20:48AM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Sunday 03 September 2006 00:13, Francesco Namuri wrote:
> > ok, I have added the lopster.desktop file and the lopster.xpm icon.
> > hoping it's ok... :)
>
> I think so. But please do not put them into the upstre
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tuxguitar".
* Package name: tuxguitar
Version : 0.8-2
Upstream Author : Julian Casadesus
* URL : http://freshmeat.net/projects/tuxguitar/
* License : LGPL
Section : contrib/sound
It builds the
On Sunday 03 September 2006 08:08, Kurt B. Kaiser wrote:
> Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> The package for stable-security is available at
> >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/flexbackup
> >
> > So far so good. But your package doesn't build correctly. You forgot
> > to
On Sunday 03 September 2006 00:13, Francesco Namuri wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 07:54:05PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > Also strange that I can't find an entry in my KDE start menu. I had
> > expected it under Debian->Applications->Network but it's not there.
> > Perhaps not your fault. Bu
36 matches
Mail list logo
