Székelyi Szabolcs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm packaging a simple library building a shared lib and a development
> package as usual. The -dev package depends on the one containing the
> shared library. Policy says that it is permitted in this situation to
> symlink documentation coming with
George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Saturday 15 July 2006 03:48, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> lintian warns if you do an NMU without mentioning it in the changelog,
>> but although it has the necessary information to do so, it doesn't do
>> the inverse. Committing a fix now.
> Thanks for y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Bas,
Bas Wijnen wrote:
[...]
> compiler". There is no such thing as "GNU/GPL".
Ok; I suppose I simply copy&pasted that from another RFS ...
> The copyright file doesn't contain this error, so that's fine. However, it
> also doesn't contain the
Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 02:33:04PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> [...]
>> I've generated a gpg key to sign the Release files and I'm using
>> mini-dinstall on the server. It appears to be working, Release and
>> Release.gpg are created and gpg can verify that the signature i
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 02:33:04PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
[...]
> I've generated a gpg key to sign the Release files and I'm using
> mini-dinstall on the server. It appears to be working, Release and
> Release.gpg are created and gpg can verify that the signature is good.
[...]
> Yet apt-get u
I'm trying to sort out my trivial apt repository properly so that my
sponsor can obtain my packages more easily.
I've generated a gpg key to sign the Release files and I'm using
mini-dinstall on the server. It appears to be working, Release and
Release.gpg are created and gpg can verify that the s
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 13:54, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 13:30 +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > I'm open to suggestions. The importer that processes uploaded packages
> > just takes into account the *.dsc and *.changes files AFAIK. None of
> > them contain the one-line descript
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 13:30 +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > And being on the whishlist line, May long description be included in
> > the RFS templates too?
>
> I'm open to suggestions. The importer that processes uploaded packages just
> takes into account the *.dsc and *.changes files AFAIK. No
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 13:16, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> Matthew Palmer написа:
> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 10:46:47AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> >> Matthew, could we please add this to the FAQ?
> >
> > It shall be done. I'll also note about dget (which is a little-known
> > tool, I think).
>
>
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 11:46, martin f krafft wrote:
> I am sure you've heard about dget: pass it a .dsc file and it will
> download the source package. This is vastly better than having to
> browse to a directory and select the files by hand.
>
> Thus I kindly ask all sponsees to always include t
Matthew Palmer написа:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 10:46:47AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
>> Matthew, could we please add this to the FAQ?
>
> It shall be done. I'll also note about dget (which is a little-known tool,
> I think).
It would be good if this is used in mendors.d.n-generated RFS
temp
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.1-5
of the package "feedparser".
It builds these binary packages:
python-feedparser - Universal Feed Parser for Python
The package is lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 374499 (ITA)
The package can be found on mentors.
also sprach Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.25.1107 +0100]:
> It shall be done. I'll also note about dget (which is
> a little-known tool, I think).
You rock, thanks a lot!
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 12:08:29PM +0200, Andreas Fester wrote:
> * Package name: subcommander
> * License : GNU/GPL
I didn't really look at the package, just at the copyright file. The reason
is that you said GNU/GPL, which is incorrect. "GNU/Linux" means "a
combination of the GNU s
"Deepak Kumar Tripathi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> Is their any tool available in Debian that convert .chm files to .pdf .
This list is for discussions about creating Debian packages; your
question seems more appropriate for a user list ([EMAIL PROTECTED], or
one of the lists
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for subcommander, a graphical client for
subversion:
* Package name: subcommander
* Description : Subcommander supports most subversion features.
Its tight integration of repository browser a
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 10:46:47AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> Matthew, could we please add this to the FAQ?
It shall be done. I'll also note about dget (which is a little-known tool,
I think).
- Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Dear mentors,
Is their any tool available in Debian that convert .chm files to .pdf .
Thanks
***
* Deepak Tripathi .---. *
* Open Source Developer/ \*
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]@./*
*
Hi,
I am sure you've heard about dget: pass it a .dsc file and it will
download the source package. This is vastly better than having to
browse to a directory and select the files by hand.
Thus I kindly ask all sponsees to always include the full path to
the .dsc file in sponsor request emails.
hi folks,
i have a bug report (#377687) which asks for a secure deletion tool to
be installed in /bin instead of /usr/bin so you can use it in
maintenance mode. makes sense in a way, and is possible when you look at
the library dependencies. but should it be done? i didn't find anything
in the pol
20 matches
Mail list logo
