On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 11:58:26PM +0200, Thomas Eriksson wrote:
> * Package name: bashish
> The package is lintian clean.
Er...?
lintian -i bashish_2.0.5-1_i386.changes |wc -l
30
To be a bit more exact:
lintian bashish_2.0.5-1_i386.changes -i|head
E: bashish: shell-script-fails-syntax-chec
Hi!
One week ago I have sent a message
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2006/07/msg00148.html)
requesting a sponsor for one package (pngnq), but I got no answers :-(
The package is very simple and it's already on Debian. It's OK with
pbuilder, linda and lintian.
If someone could verify an
George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday 14 July 2006 10:08, Bas Wijnen wrote:
>> They could check that non-NMU uploads must not say "Non maintainer
>> upload" in the changelog. Appearantly they don't do that. I think a
>> wishlist bug is in order there.
> Well, it makes no differ
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bashish".
* Package name: bashish
Version : 2.0.5-1
Upstream Author : Thomas Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://bashish.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Section : shells
It builds these
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 08:47:01AM +0200, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> hi,
>
> i've got a lintian error:
>
> E: libstrigihtmlgui0: shlib-with-non-pic-code
> usr/lib/libstrigihtmlgui.so.0.3.2
[...]
> It seems to use -fPIC and shared as mentionned by lintian and i didn't find
> any assembly code.
[...]
Hi,
I'm looking for a sponsor for zimpl, a mathematical modeling language for
optimization problems.
RFP/ITP: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=365073
* Package name: zimpl
Version : 2.04
Upstream Author : Thorsten Koch
* URL : http://www.zib.de/koch/
Hi Carlos,
I had a look at your package.
I found some issues before I try to build it:
Carlos Enrique Carleos Artime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * Package name : giac
> * License : GPL (separate package for non-free documents)
> It builds these binary packages:
> giac - computer alge
Hi debian-mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 210r20001005-1 of the
package "jzip", a text mode interpreter for Z-Code adventures. It was
recently orphaned (see #377871), and I'm adopting it and updating to a
"new" upstream version from the year 2000. Although upstream developm
Dear Justin Pryzby, you wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 09:21:01PM +0200, Maxime ROBACHE wrote:
> > I wrote a little sudoku solver in C with Xlib, and I debianized it.
> > So, I'm looking for a sponsor to upload it on official repository.
I'm not your sponsor, but you might find it interesting t
Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So please, please, please do fix (remove) the rpath in the package.
>
> I would appreciate any tips on how to go about fixing this. My package
> is courierpassd, currently only available in unstable. It depends on
> courier-authlib which currently uses /u
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 09:57:26AM -0400, Charles Fry wrote:
> > So please, please, please do fix (remove) the rpath in the package.
>
> I would appreciate any tips on how to go about fixing this. My package
> is courierpassd, currently only available in unstable. It depends on
> courier-authlib w
> So please, please, please do fix (remove) the rpath in the package.
I would appreciate any tips on how to go about fixing this. My package
is courierpassd, currently only available in unstable. It depends on
courier-authlib which currently uses /usr/lib/courier-authlib. I can't
figure out how to
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 02:34:41PM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
> is it possible to have two different binary packages with the same
> source package name (but different upstream versions of the source)?
No. The package with the later version will overwrite the earlier
one, and this will cause the
Hi,
is it possible to have two different binary packages with the same
source package name (but different upstream versions of the source)?
Reason: I'm about to package octave-forge for both Octave 2.1 and 2.9
(you can consider octave-forge as plugin, that needs to be compiled for
the respective
On Friday 14 July 2006 14:49, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 01:31:22PM +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
> > > That also should be catched and warned, since an NMU done by a
> > > maintaner makes no sense.
> >
> > It's not very common, but it does: the NMU is prepared by another
> > non-D
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 01:31:22PM +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
> > That also should be catched and warned, since an NMU done by a
> > maintaner makes no sense.
>
> It's not very common, but it does: the NMU is prepared by another
> non-DD and the package maintainer sponsors it.
I remember a thr
El Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:56:00 +0300
George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On Friday 14 July 2006 10:08, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 09:34:20AM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> > > > > > shc (3.8.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
> > > >
> > > > ^^^
> > > >
> > > > Thi
Hi Mentors,
I'm looking for a sponsor for this tiny screen cast utility named byzanz:
* Package name: byzanz
Version : 0.1.1
Upstream Author : Benjamin Otte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://people.freedesktop.org/~company/byzanz
* License : GPL
Description
Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 05:32:12PM -0400, Charles Fry wrote:
>> > > > Depends. Does it actually fix the warning?
>> > >
>> > > Yes, but it also broke my binary, which can no longer find the needed
>> > > library. Any suggestions? Is rpath okay in this case
On Friday 14 July 2006 10:08, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 09:34:20AM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> > > > > shc (3.8.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
> > >
> > > ^^^
> > >
> > > This is the wrong version number for an NMU anyway.
> >
> > True. Fixed as -0.1. Hm, it would be n
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 09:34:20AM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> > > > shc (3.8.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
> >
> > ^^^
> >
> > This is the wrong version number for an NMU anyway.
>
> True. Fixed as -0.1. Hm, it would be nice if lintian and linda warn if
> changelog claims Non-mainta
21 matches
Mail list logo
