Re: Different versions between library and its supplied binary program

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael Biebl wrote: >> The so-version of the library does not need to match the project >> version number (If it does it is most likely a sign that upstream >> did not understand what so-versioning means [1]). So, create 3 >> packages with the follow

Re: Different versions between library and its supplied binary program

Roi Rodriguez schrieb: > Hi all, > > I'm packaging a library (harminv, which implements a method to solve > harmonic inversion problems) which supplies a program which makes use > of the library... According to the section 8.2 of Debian Policy, i've > to put the program into the -dev package, or i

Different versions between library and its supplied binary program

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I'm packaging a library (harminv, which implements a method to solve harmonic inversion problems) which supplies a program which makes use of the library... According to the section 8.2 of Debian Policy, i've to put the program into the -dev p

Re: RFS: muswsusp [userspace software suspend], liblzf-dev

On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 07:16:04 +0200 Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tim Dijkstra wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I need a sponsor for two packages: muswsusp and liblzf. The former > > contains the binaries you need to use the new software suspend > > facility available in the 2.6.17 kernel. I wr

RFS: zeroinstall-injector

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zeroinstall-injector". * Package name: zeroinstall-injector Version : 0.21-3 Upstream Author : Thomas Leonard * URL : http://0install.net/ * License : LGPL Section : admin It builds these binary

RFS: jpnevulator

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jpnevulator". * Package name: jpnevulator Version : 1.2.1-1 Upstream Author : Freddy Spierenburg * URL : http://jpnevulator.snarl.nl/ * License : GPL Section : comm It builds these binary packa

RFS: gtkradiant

From: Frits Daalmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: RFS: gtkradiant Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gtkradiant". * Package name: gtkradiant Version : 1.5.0-1 Upstream Author : Id Software, Inc. and contributors * URL

Re: 1 source, 2 binaries, 2 CFLAGS and cdbs

On 6/25/06, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Eddy Petrişor wrote: >> ? I didn't say to do that. Patching the Makefiles used by autotools >> before cdbs runs was my point. > > Err, yes, my bad, indeed, you did not say that. OK, I see the problem. I've used "autotools" where I really meant

RFS: gplanarity

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gplanarity". * Package name: gplanarity Version : 11496-1 Upstream Author : Monty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://web.mit.edu/xiphmont/Public/gPlanarity.html * License : GPL-2 Section : games

Re: 1 source, 2 binaries, 2 CFLAGS and cdbs

Eddy Petrişor wrote: >> ? I didn't say to do that. Patching the Makefiles used by autotools >> before cdbs runs was my point. > > Err, yes, my bad, indeed, you did not say that. OK, I see the problem. I've used "autotools" where I really meant "automake" - i.e. the normal make process that all bi

Re: 1 source, 2 binaries, 2 CFLAGS and cdbs

On 6/25/06, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Eddy Petrişor wrote: > On 6/25/06, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> All this is quite a lot of automake patching and if you can get upstream >> onside it will be a lot easier. > > Running autotools in debian/rules ? I didn't say to

RFS - kwin-style-dekorator -- window decoration for kde using png images

Hi! I am looking for comments - and hopefully a sponsorship - for kwin-style-dekorator. Source: kwin-style-dekorator Section: kde Priority: optional Maintainer: Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5), autotools-dev, kdebase-dev Standards-Version: 3.7.2 Package: kwin-sty

Re: 1 source, 2 binaries, 2 CFLAGS and cdbs

Eddy Petrişor wrote: > On 6/25/06, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> All this is quite a lot of automake patching and if you can get upstream >> onside it will be a lot easier. > > Running autotools in debian/rules ? I didn't say to do that. Patching the Makefiles used by autotools befo

Re: 1 source, 2 binaries, 2 CFLAGS and cdbs

On 6/25/06, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi. > > How implement conditions following? > > 1) libfoo0 and libfoo0-athlon are binary packages builded from libfoo >source package > 2) CFLAGS for build libfoo0 are differents that for build libfoo0-athlon > 3)

Re: 1 source, 2 binaries, 2 CFLAGS and cdbs

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi. > > How implement conditions following? > > 1) libfoo0 and libfoo0-athlon are binary packages builded from libfoo >source package > 2) CFLAGS for build libfoo0 are differents that for build libfoo0-athlon > 3) debian/control contains libfoo0 (Architecture: any)

Re: 1 source, 2 binaries, 2 CFLAGS and cdbs

On 6/25/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi. How implement conditions following? 1) libfoo0 and libfoo0-athlon are binary packages builded from libfoo source package 2) CFLAGS for build libfoo0 are differents that for build libfoo0-athlon 3) debian/control contains libfoo0 (

Re: RFS: collectd [uploaded]

> I'm looking for a sponsor for my collectd package. collectd is a small daemon > that collects various system statistics and saves them to RRD files. Since it > is written in C and stays in memory it is very fast and easy on the system. > The statistics are very fine grained since the files are up