Hello again mentors, I've started to package from sratch gsubedit
(a subtitle editor for Gnme) but wen I run the configure script it
keeps complaining about the missing of gnomeConf.sh file (I already
installed the dev libraries for gnome) but still didn't worked.So I'
ve started googleing and
Thamk you all for the help, I will try to combine all the tricks you
have teached me
Cheers.
Mihai Felseghi.
On 6/23/06, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 01:51:14PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 6/23/06, Mihai Felseghi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 11:44:43PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> You have dh-make-perl cruft in debian/rules, copyright and control -
> please fix those up. This is mostly harmless boilerplate and extra
> comments that aren't needed, but I like to see all the files have what
> you need and no more.
Package: gaim-python (source pygaim)
License: GPL
Version: 1.5.0-1-1
URL: http://pygaim.sf.net
Description: python plugin support for gaim
PyGaim adds Python plugin support to the Gaim instant
messaging client. It includes a Python plugin loader
and Python bindings for the Gaim plugin API.
> "all" is not a package, it's a (pseudo) version, you can't use
ouh... indeed... pseudo-version... That helps ;-)
> "version (>= version)" syntax.
> For arch indep packages use just "all" or ">= 2.3"
> For arch dep packages, you need to add "any" part
> ("any", "any, >=2.3", "any, >=2.3, <<2.5",
Tim Dijkstra wrote:
A debian package I'm making has as part of its source a (almost)
verbatim copy of the source of a package that is already in debian. It
works perfectly like this and it's only 916K, but it feels a bit of a
waste to include it in the source package.
I can't however build-depen
Hi all,
[ please CC, I'm not in this list ]
A debian package I'm making has as part of its source a (almost)
verbatim copy of the source of a package that is already in debian. It
works perfectly like this and it's only 916K, but it feels a bit of a
waste to include it in the source package.
I ca
Piotr Ozarowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> For arch dep packages, you need to add "any" part
> ("any", "any, >=2.3", "any, >=2.3, <<2.5", ...)
heh, you need to add "any" to Architecture header, not to
XS-Python-Version of course
--
-=[ Piotr Ozarowski ]=-
-=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl ]=-
pg
Yaroslav Halchenko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > I'm not a DD, but thats my 2 cents after looking at diff file: You
> > can't use "all (>=2.3)" in XS-Python-Version header, it has to be:
> > "all, >=2.3" if you want to support all python versions >= 2.3
> yikes! Thank you for warning me. Although I thin
> I'm not a DD, but thats my 2 cents after looking at diff file: You
> can't use "all (>=2.3)" in XS-Python-Version header, it has to be:
> "all, >=2.3" if you want to support all python versions >= 2.3
yikes! Thank you for warning me. Although I think it is quite in
dissonance with the rest of con
Piotr Ozarowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> it has to be: "all, >=2.3" if you want to support all python
> versions >= 2.3
or better only ">=2.3"
--
-=[ Piotr Ozarowski ]=-
-=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl ]=-
pgpZW9EAs5HT8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Yaroslav Halchenko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> anyone to sponsor my beautiful packages? ;-) they are very clean (linda
> and lintian are happy with them), satisfy recent python extensions
> packaging policy, work fine, and might be of interest for quite a
> few Debian people.
I'm not a DD, but thats my
Dear DDs
anyone to sponsor my beautiful packages? ;-) they are very clean (linda
and lintian are happy with them), satisfy recent python extensions
packaging policy, work fine, and might be of interest for quite a
few Debian people.
Thank you in advance
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Yaroslav Halchenko wr
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 05:55:11PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 22:31 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > * On the first upload, debian/changelog should have just one entry.
> > This is somewhat clumsy if you have a history of this package in
> > your private/local reposito
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 01:51:14PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 6/23/06, Mihai Felseghi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello dear mentors , please tell me if there is a method of finding
> >the build depends for a piece of software (so i can fill the
> >Build-Depends field of
This one time, at band camp, Mihai Felseghi said:
> Masami Ichikawa wrote:
> > on 06/24/06 01:48, Mihai Felseghi wrote:
> >>> Hello dear mentors , please tell me if there is a method of finding
> >>> the build depends for a piece of software
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]% objdump -p /usr/bin/flux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Masami Ichikawa wrote:
> Hi.
>
> on 06/24/06 01:48, Mihai Felseghi wrote:
>>> Hello dear mentors , please tell me if there is a method of finding
>>> the build depends for a piece of software (so i can fill the
>>> Build-Depends field of the control
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
on 06/24/06 01:48, Mihai Felseghi wrote:
> Hello dear mentors , please tell me if there is a method of finding
> the build depends for a piece of software (so i can fill the
> Build-Depends field of the control file)? I tried to use the script f
Hi!
On 6/23/06, Mihai Felseghi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello dear mentors , please tell me if there is a method of finding
the build depends for a piece of software (so i can fill the
Build-Depends field of the control file)? I tried to use the script from
New Maintainers Guide but it gave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello dear mentors , please tell me if there is a method of finding
the build depends for a piece of software (so i can fill the
Build-Depends field of the control file)? I tried to use the script from
New Maintainers Guide but it gave me no help.
20 matches
Mail list logo
