about Eva (bug #349997)

2006-06-10 Thread Wei Mingzhi
Hi all, As this package is still not in Debian, I would like to volunteer in packing it. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=349997 I am currently maintaining an unofficial Debian apt repository at: http://planet.time.net.my/TechnologyPark/evadeb/ Direct download of the package: htt

Re: Somebody please put peless in a debian repository!

2006-06-10 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 10:20:34PM -0500, Paul Elliott a écrit : > > All the debian style files can be found at: > > ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/peless/ubuntu.510/ Dear Paul, I had a quick look at your package. Here are some immediate comments: - There are many template files from the debian dir

Somebody please put peless in a debian repository!

2006-06-10 Thread Paul Elliott
Peless is a simple text file lister. It uses gtkmm. GPLed. Somebody please put it in a debian repository. I have already created a .deb file Everything about peless can be found at: http://peless.berlios.de/ I have tested peless on ubuntu 510. I am not an expert on debian style packageing bu

Re: RFC/RFS: gmail-notify

2006-06-10 Thread Joseph Smidt
On 6/10/06, Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/10/06, Joseph Smidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> I have just packaged gmail-notify which can be found at this address: > http://josephsmidt.googlepages.com/debianpackages.  It passes linitian> test and builds fine.The .orig.tar.gz seem

Re: [RFS] museek+: file-sharing application for the SoulSeek peer-to-peer network

2006-06-10 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Margarita Manterola [Sat, 10 Jun 2006 19:22:49 -0300]: > I noticed this because I can't build your package with my pbuilder if > I don't install the build-dependencies OUTSIDE the pbuilder. I hadn't > encountered such behaviour in any other package. Next time, try doing it without debhelper in

Re: Seeking for sponsor for a download manager called "wxDownload Fast"

2006-06-10 Thread Max Velasques
Hi, I release a new version(0.4.4) of the wxDownload Fast and I'm still looking for sponsor. The files are: wxdfast_0.4.4-1.dsc - http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/dfast/wxdfast_0.4.4-1.dsc?download wxdfast_0.4.4-1_i386.changes - http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/dfast/wxdfast_0.4.4-1_i386.c

Re: [RFS] museek+: file-sharing application for the SoulSeek peer-to-peer network

2006-06-10 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Margarita Manterola wrote: On 6/7/06, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nobody is interrested in sponsoring me ? Your package does weird things, related to the fact that it uses scons for building. For example, it checks for build-dependencies at clean time: # Run scons -c f

Re: [RFS] museek+: file-sharing application for the SoulSeek peer-to-peer network

2006-06-10 Thread Margarita Manterola
On 6/7/06, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nobody is interrested in sponsoring me ? Your package does weird things, related to the fact that it uses scons for building. For example, it checks for build-dependencies at clean time: # Run scons -c for cleaning scons QTDIR=/usr

Re: RFC/RFS: gmail-notify

2006-06-10 Thread Margarita Manterola
On 6/10/06, Joseph Smidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have just packaged gmail-notify which can be found at this address: http://josephsmidt.googlepages.com/debianpackages. It passes linitian test and builds fine. The .orig.tar.gz seems not to be available from that location -- Besos, Marga

Re: RFS: checkinstall

2006-06-10 Thread Felipe Sateler
Kari Pahula wrote: > Looks good. Just two things: > > I don't quite understand why you're closing #354389 in > debian/changelog. That bug is closed already, and I'm not sure how > it'd be explained by "New upstream version". Hmm, when I added the entry it was not fixed. Anyway, this bug was fix

Risparmia un Bimestre di Canone Telcom

2006-06-10 Thread webmaster
Gentile linux.debian.devel.mentors Per il periodo estivo Telcom Italia sta proponendo una fantastica offerta in Collaborazione con Ebai Italia. Quello che ti sta per proporre è di registrarti GRATUITAMENTE su Ebai (cliccando questo link: http://clk.tradedoubler.com/click?p=1699&a=1192

Re: RFS: mpdscribble [Uploaded]

2006-06-10 Thread Christoph Haas
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 01:12:19AM +0200, Michal Čihař wrote: > I'm looking for sponsor to upload new upstream version of > mpdscribble[1]. It is already in archives [2], but original sponsor > lost interest in uploading this. Package is linda and lintian clear > (this time even without double link

Re: RFS: libnet-dbus-perl -- Perl extension for the DBus message system

2006-06-10 Thread ms419
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 12:50:49PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote: > Can you tell me where it was downloaded from? I prefer to test against > the upstream tarball. I am somewhat interested in this, a I would like > to be able to script some dbus queries for desktop use, and this seems > like a reaason

Re: RFS: libnet-dbus-perl -- Perl extension for the DBus message system

2006-06-10 Thread Stephen Gran
Can you tell me where it was downloaded from? I prefer to test against the upstream tarball. I am somewhat interested in this, a I would like to be able to script some dbus queries for desktop use, and this seems like a reaasonable way. Thanks, -- --

Re: RFS: xboard

2006-06-10 Thread Florian Ernst
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 08:10:38AM -0400, Alexander L. Belikoff wrote: > will allow it at all. BTW, what's the policy about bugs/features that > are so deeply ingrained in the code that fixing would require a > significant rewrite? Are such bugs supposed to stay active even if > upstream author is

Re: RFS: uae - The Ubiquitous Amiga Emulator, RC bugs fixed!

2006-06-10 Thread Florian Ernst
Hello *, On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 10:57:10PM +0200, Antonio Ospite wrote: > I have an updated 'uae' package (uae - The Ubiquitous Amiga Emulator: > Base). Fixed two FTBFS and some other sparse fixes, and a general > update to the package that was unmaintained since two years. If someone > would lik

Re: RFS: checkinstall

2006-06-10 Thread Kari Pahula
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 06:52:24PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > Hello there. I'm re-requesting a sponsor for package checkinstall (actually Looks good. Just two things: I don't quite understand why you're closing #354389 in debian/changelog. That bug is closed already, and I'm not sure how it