Hi!
On 6/1/06, Joseph Smidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lintian keeps complaining I do not list a dependancy on python. But no
matter what I put, including python in all its forms it still complians. I
was wondering if somebody could comment on my package to see what I am doing
wrong. It you h
On 6/3/06, Franz Pletz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 01:46:35PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> ambiguous names (convert, makegunplut, project) which will not be useful
Please keep in mind that there's already a convert binary in
imagemagick, so you should either not install
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 01:46:35PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> ambiguous names (convert, makegunplut, project) which will not be useful
Please keep in mind that there's already a convert binary in
imagemagick, so you should either not install those to /usr/bin and
distribute them for instance u
Hi!
On 6/3/06, Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On the other hand, it could simply build a probcons-extra package by
default, with a clear description saying that it is likely that
probcons-extra will not be useful to the persons tempted to install it.
My opinion is that it's better t
On Sat, 3 Jun 2006, Charles Plessy wrote:
However, I was wondering wether it would make sense to provide to the
Debian user a mean to install the extra programs from the Debian
sources. Is there a way to make the source package able to produce a
probcons-extra package, but only optionaly?
On
Dear all,
I am working on packaging probcons, which consists of two main programs
carrying the core functionalities, and a few other programs with
ambiguous names (convert, makegunplut, project) which will not be useful
to the vast majority of users. The upstream author advised me to drop
them fro
Le Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 04:10:29PM +0200, Florent Rougon a écrit :
> The files pertaining to the Debian packaging are
> (c) 2006 Kevin Bube.
>
Hello,
Maybe one could suggest a replacement for the word "pertaining", which
may b
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 05:41:13PM +0200, Florent Rougon wrote:
> Nicolas Duboc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > About the second issue, the current state of my work includes the
> > modules in the diff.gz file. This file is then 531K. Do you think it is
> > acceptable ?
>
> Maybe you'd be bette
Hallo Frank,
* Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-02 15:29]:
> Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Michael Tautschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-30 23:13]:
> >> As I've been told a few hours ago, I hereby request a sponsor for an NMU of
> >> gcc-h8300-hms.
> >>
> >> The files ar
Nicolas Duboc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> About the second issue, the current state of my work includes the
> modules in the diff.gz file. This file is then 531K. Do you think it is
> acceptable ?
Maybe you'd be better off with something like quilt, dpatch or cdbs,
that would allow clean separa
Hi,
I intend to adopt jython and have started to work on its RC bug
(#362292).
In this bug report you can find a mail I have sent to the previous
maintainer (without answer). It raises some issues I have about this
bug.
Perhaps you can help me on that ?
About the second issue, the curren
Kari Pahula wrote:
> Mailed to mentors, we like to do stuff in public and I don't claim to
> be infallible, either. ;-)
OK!
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 02:09:49AM +0200, Vedran Fura? wrote:
>> Kari Pahula wrote:
>>> As far as the technical side of packaging goes, it seems to be mostly
>>> in a goo
Hi,
Fixed it. When I "cleaned" calls to dh_* scripts, I removed
dh_shlibdeps... Shame on me ;-)
New version is 0.7.2-3.
Many thanks for looking at it, regards,
Jean
Le 01.06.2006 22:29, Christoph Haas a écrit :
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 12:14:02PM +0200, Jean Parpaillon wrote:
>
>> That shou
Hi,
Kevin Bube <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After reading bug #366234 I set debhelper requirement to >=5.0.35. See
Fine. That's also what I had done with lmodern in the meantime.
>> 3. I'm not a native english speaker, but I would modify the Description
>>field this way:
>
> [snip]
>
>>
>
>
> Hallo Michael,
>
> * Michael Tautschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-30 23:13]:
> > As I've been told a few hours ago, I hereby request a sponsor for an NMU of
> > gcc-h8300-hms.
> >
> > The files are available from http://www.model.in.tum.de/~tautschn/debian/ ;
> > the
> > according patch ha
Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hallo Michael,
>
> * Michael Tautschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-30 23:13]:
>> As I've been told a few hours ago, I hereby request a sponsor for an NMU of
>> gcc-h8300-hms.
>>
>> The files are available from http://www.model.in.tum.de/~tautschn/debian/
Hallo Joseph,
* Joseph Smidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-01 18:09]:
> Lintian keeps complaining I do not list a dependancy on python. But no
> matter what I put, including python in all its forms it still complians.
> I was wondering if somebody could comment on my package to see what I am
> doi
Hallo Michael,
* Michael Tautschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-30 23:13]:
> As I've been told a few hours ago, I hereby request a sponsor for an NMU of
> gcc-h8300-hms.
>
> The files are available from http://www.model.in.tum.de/~tautschn/debian/ ;
> the
> according patch has been posted to t
Kevin Bube <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> W: urw-garamond-no8 source: build-depends-without-arch-dep defoma
> W: urw-garamond-no8 source: build-depends-without-arch-dep tex-common
>
> Can they be ignored? The binary package depends on both.
That doesn't matter. What lintian wants to say is this:
19 matches
Mail list logo
