On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 12:30:06AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> I have more or less made ready a new package for checkinstall and
> installwatch (which are now only one package). The new packages are
> available through debian.mentors.net [1]
> Major differences from previous packages:
> 1) Merg
I have more or less made ready a new package for checkinstall and
installwatch (which are now only one package). The new packages are
available through debian.mentors.net [1]
Major differences from previous packages:
1) Merged installwatch and checkinstall.
2) Re-Debianized the package. Reasons: m
Hi Adriaan,
On Thursday, 23 Mar 2006, you wrote:
> Hello,
> As far as I can tell from [1], there is a circular dependency between
> gnome-panel and meta-gnome2, and there are no other dependencies. So is
if there are circular dependency you might want to ask on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to hint this pac
El jue, 23-03-2006 a las 20:40 +0100, Bastian Venthur escribió:
> Really? What did you change in the relevant debian/* files? I've only
> changed the control file (build-depends [see beginning of thread]) so
> far. Did you modify anything else in the debian/rules or something? Does
> Byzanz really
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 18:34, Francois-Denis Gonthier wrote:
Oh and I forgot to mention that it would be a one shot sponsoring. My sponsor
seems busy lately (always?) and I don't want to push him to upload this
quickly.
> Hello all
>
> erlang 10.b.9-2 made its way in Sid just recently. I'v
Marco Cabizza wrote:
> El jue, 23-03-2006 a las 12:52 -0600, Joe Wreschnig escribió:
>> No, the error message sucks, it doesn't distinguish between two
>> different (completely unrelated) failures. I reported this earlier
>> as http://bugs.debian.org/358253 when I was trying to get Byzanz
>> compil
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 19:35 +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 18:20 +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> >> checking for GTHREAD... configure: error: Byzanz requires GThread-2.0 >=
> >> and XDamage >= 1.0 to compile.
> >> make: *** [config.status] Erro
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 07:15:38PM +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> Just a question: is it so poorly known that anyone can search for
> package contents?
I don't know, but it seems to me that listing and searching files are
intuitively obvious things that any package management system should
do.
El jue, 23-03-2006 a las 12:52 -0600, Joe Wreschnig escribió:
> No, the error message sucks, it doesn't distinguish between two
> different (completely unrelated) failures. I reported this earlier
> as http://bugs.debian.org/358253 when I was trying to get Byzanz
> compiled.
I was trying to make a
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 07:35:18PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 18:20 +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> >> checking for GTHREAD... configure: error: Byzanz requires GThread-2.0 >=
> >> and XDamage >= 1.0 to compile.
> >> make: *** [config.statu
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 18:20 +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> checking for GTHREAD... configure: error: Byzanz requires GThread-2.0 >=
> and XDamage >= 1.0 to compile.
> make: *** [config.status] Error 1
>
> Currently my package build-depends on: debhelper (>= 4.0.0),
> autotools-dev, libexpat1-dev
Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 18:20 +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
>> checking for GTHREAD... configure: error: Byzanz requires GThread-2.0 >=
>> and XDamage >= 1.0 to compile.
>> make: *** [config.status] Error 1
>>
>> Currently my package build-depends on: debhelper (>= 4.0.0
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 19:15:38 +0100
Laszlo Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a question: is it so poorly known that anyone can search for
> package contents?
I hope no.
--
KiyuKo
"Like Russian Rulette with six bullets loaded"
pgppPxhk7vo3O.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 18:20 +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> checking for GTHREAD... configure: error: Byzanz requires GThread-2.0 >=
> and XDamage >= 1.0 to compile.
> make: *** [config.status] Error 1
>
> Currently my package build-depends on: debhelper (>= 4.0.0),
> autotools-dev, libexpat1-de
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 06:20:21PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently working on a small GTK2 app and while trying to compile it
> under a clean pbuilder environment, I get the following error during the
> config phase:
>
> checking for GTHREAD... configure: error: Byzanz requi
Michal Čihař wrote:
>> checking for GTHREAD... configure: error: Byzanz requires GThread-2.0 >=
>> and XDamage >= 1.0 to compile.
>> make: *** [config.status] Error 1
>>
>> Currently my package build-depends on: debhelper (>= 4.0.0),
>> autotools-dev, libexpat1-dev, libxdamage-dev, libpanelappletm
Hi
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 18:20:21 +0100
Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm currently working on a small GTK2 app and while trying to compile it
> under a clean pbuilder environment, I get the following error during the
> config phase:
>
> checking for GTHREAD... configure: error: Byz
Hi,
I'm currently working on a small GTK2 app and while trying to compile it
under a clean pbuilder environment, I get the following error during the
config phase:
checking for GTHREAD... configure: error: Byzanz requires GThread-2.0 >=
and XDamage >= 1.0 to compile.
make: *** [config.status] Er
Hello,
This question has probably been asked several times before, but I am
trying to figure out why gnome-panel does not enter testing. Two
packages I maintain are waiting for it for them to move to testing as
well.
As far as I can tell from [1], there is a circular dependency between
gnome-pane
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 03:07:53PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1) debconf talks about setting {false,true} flags to questions. Does
> the set of possible flags predefined or can I invent a flag of my
> own? For example, can I have an "install the package unattendedly"
> flag?
"noninteractive
1) debconf talks about setting {false,true} flags to questions. Does the set of
possible
flags predefined or can I invent a flag of my own? For example, can I have
an
"install the package unattendedly" flag?
2) The lvm2 deb doesn't have a config file in the sense of debconf config fi
Hello,
Jonas Genannt wrote:
Debian source and binary package:
http://jonas.capi2name.de/debian-upload/w3c-linkchecker/
I have updated the packages... Now all images are included in the package!
Greets,
Jonas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 10:50:38AM +0200, Kari Pahula wrote:
> Restarting crossfire-server will cause any remote players to have their
> connection abrubtly broken and to lose any progress that they've had since
> their logon. That's not quite what I'd call a smooth upgrade.
I don't know if you a
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 06:08:13PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 12:11:59AM +0200, Kari Pahula wrote:
> > problems. The server runs as a daemon and will be more or less at an
> > inconsistent state if the maps are upgraded while it is running.
> So you want to have a one-wa
24 matches
Mail list logo
