On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 04:57:15PM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
> > But when the package is native, you get to real _all_ changes in
> > changelog, so the situation is at least not worse in that case?
> It depends on if you wanted to read the `upstream' changes or not :)
> What are you currently putti
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 00:11:28 +0100
Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you would upload it while the previous version was in Debian, you would
> need a new version. Debian doesn't support uploading a version of a package
> which isn't higher than the one currently in the archive.
You are r
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 10:56:55PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> The package has never been in Debian, and even if it had, no one would want
> to update it just because of a change in the mantainer scripts: the content
> of the package is exactly the same.
If you would upload it while the previ
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006 22:04:47 +0100
Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I suggest bumping the package version and making a note of
> > your changes in debian/changelog when you make a change: the
> > tool 'dch -i' from the package source dir will help you do
> > this.
>
> Personally, as long
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 04:55:40PM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 12:50:42PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:03:06 -0500
> > Removed the useless scripts. Files are at the same place:
> >
> > http://www.kiyuko.org/pool/beef_0.0.3.orig.tar.gz
> > ht
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 07:41:43PM +0200, Panu Kalliokoski wrote:
> But when the package is native, you get to real _all_ changes in
> changelog, so the situation is at least not worse in that case?
It depends on if you wanted to read the `upstream' changes or not :)
What are you currently putting
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 12:50:42PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:03:06 -0500
> Removed the useless scripts. Files are at the same place:
>
> http://www.kiyuko.org/pool/beef_0.0.3.orig.tar.gz
> http://www.kiyuko.org/pool/beef_0.0.3-1.diff.gz
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 09:51:44AM +0100, Cedric BRINER wrote:
> > >after searching for a copyright, I sent him an email about it:
> >
> > >>There is not copyright on pCFITSIO. No guaranties either :-)
> >
> > >so I was wondering, if such kind of 'NO COPYRIGHT' can be included in
> >
I have updated these packages to build separate .orig.tar.gz and
.diff.gz sources.
Panu
--
personal contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED], +35841 5323835
technical contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.iki.fi/atehwa/
PGP fingerprint:0EA5 9D33 6590 FFD4 921C 5A5F BE85 08F1 3169 70EC
-
Hello Francesco,
I'm not a DD yet, but I've reviewed your package anyway and here are
some comments:
> This package is in the Requested Packages list:
>
> RFP: libtime-unix-perl -- cross-platform time() for Perl
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=290136
You should retitle
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 22:18 +0800, Hou ZhengPeng wrote:
> I'm looking for a sponsor for the following package:
> ITP : #349997
> Author: casper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> yunfan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Home Page: http://sourceforge.net/projects/evaq
> License: GPL-2
> Source: eva
Where can the source pack
Hi,
* Panu Kalliokoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-01 15:11]:
> It seems tinyscheme has already been packaged for sid (albeit with an
> older version), so this is not RFS after all. I'm going to contact the
> packager.
LC_ALL=C apt-cache policy tinyscheme
W: Unable to locate package tinyscheme
I
I'm looking for a sponsor for the following package:
ITP : #349997
Author: casper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> yunfan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://sourceforge.net/projects/evaq
License: GPL-2
Source: eva
Section: kde
Priority: optional
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0.0), autotools-dev, kdelibs4-d
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
I think it would be a shame if etch will be shipped without a BraiFuck
interpreter. We must get one in.
$ apt-cache search brainfuck
bf - a fast Brainfuck interpreter
libacme-brainfck-perl - Embed Brainf*ck in your perl code
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 09:13 +0200, Panu Kalliokoski wrote:
> It seems the only sensible way, then, because I really want to include
> the debian/ files in my real release (they contain possibly useful
> metadata, like the changelog, after all).
You would best place the changelog in the root of you
It seems tinyscheme has already been packaged for sid (albeit with an
older version), so this is not RFS after all. I'm going to contact the
packager.
Panu
--
personal contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED], +35841 5323835
technical contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.iki.fi/atehwa/
PGP finge
I'm looking for a sponsor for the following package:
ITP: : #354094
Package name : quarry
Version : 0.1.16
Upstream Author : Paul Pogonyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://home.gna.org/quarry/index.html
License : GPL
Section: games
Priority:
Hi all,
I'm looking for a sponsor for the following package:
ITP:: #302896
Package name: unrar-free
Version : 0.0.1+cvs20060228
Upstream Author : Jeroen Dekkers, Ben Asselstine
URL : https://gna.org/projects/unrar
License : GPL
Descriptio
> >after searching for a copyright, I sent him an email about it:
>
> >>There is not copyright on pCFITSIO. No guaranties either :-)
>
> >so I was wondering, if such kind of 'NO COPYRIGHT' can be included in
> >debian ?
>
> Sure. It's public domain. I'd write a small blurb into the
Hallo Panu,
* Panu Kalliokoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-01 09:19]:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 11:38:00PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
[...]
> > - your package dependencies are broken, there is no package
> > named stx2any in debian
>
> stx2any is one of the packages I'm seeking sponsors for. T
20 matches
Mail list logo
