Hi all,
Is anyone interested in sponsoring WWW::Topica now that the upstream
bugs are resolved? It is a perl script (and some modules) for converting
the list archives at lists.topica.com into mbox files. I also need
either a sponsor for the dependencies, or for the pkg-perl group to take
ownershi
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 07:49:35PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > On Tue, January 3, 2006 09:47, Gregor Richards wrote:
> > > I updated the package to 1.0.0. The version compare algorithm doesn't
> > > like it ... it thinks that 1.0.0 is less than 1.0.0rc5 ... but that's
This one time, at band camp, Roger Leigh said:
> Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> >> On Tue, January 3, 2006 09:47, Gregor Richards wrote:
> >> > I updated the package to 1.0.0. The version compare algorithm doesn't
> >> > like it ... it thinks that 1.0.0 i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>> On Tue, January 3, 2006 09:47, Gregor Richards wrote:
>> > I updated the package to 1.0.0. The version compare algorithm doesn't
>> > like it ... it thinks that 1.0.0 is less than
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Tue, January 3, 2006 09:47, Gregor Richards wrote:
> > I updated the package to 1.0.0. The version compare algorithm doesn't
> > like it ... it thinks that 1.0.0 is less than 1.0.0rc5 ... but that's not
> > how release candidates work :)
>
> That's indeed a caveat on t
Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, January 3, 2006 09:47, Gregor Richards wrote:
>> I updated the package to 1.0.0. The version compare algorithm doesn't
>> like it ... it thinks that 1.0.0 is less than 1.0.0rc5 ... but that's
>> not how release candidates work :)
> That's ind
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> http://moritz-naumann.com/adv/0003/tikiw/0003.txt
> Is this fixed in your package, the advisory says that 1.9.2 is affected
> as well?
The developers claim that 1.9.2 is not vulnerable, contrary to what was
stated in the advisory. See
http://www.derkeiler.com/Mailing-L
On Tue, January 3, 2006 09:47, Gregor Richards wrote:
> I updated the package to 1.0.0. The version compare algorithm doesn't
> like it ... it thinks that 1.0.0 is less than 1.0.0rc5 ... but that's not
> how release candidates work :)
That's indeed a caveat on the Debian version compare algorithm
Marcus Better wrote:
> Package name: tikiwiki
> Version : 1.9.2
http://moritz-naumann.com/adv/0003/tikiw/0003.txt
Is this fixed in your package, the advisory says that 1.9.2 is affected
as well? (The path disclosure is not an issue, but the XSS could be)
Given that there've been f
I am looking for a sponsor for this package.
Package name: tikiwiki
Version : 1.9.2
Upstream Author : Luis Argerich, Garland Foster, Eduardo Polidor, et. al.
URL or Web page : http://tikiwiki.org
License : LGPL
Description : groupware and content management syst
I updated the package to 1.0.0. The version compare algorithm doesn't like
it ... it thinks that 1.0.0 is less than 1.0.0rc5 ... but that's not how
release candidates work :)
Anyway, the new package is uploaded.
- Gregor Richards
From: "Gregor Richards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-men
11 matches
Mail list logo