I released an new version of auctiongallery and made a new Debian
package. Can someone take a look at it. I need a sponsor who can upload
it to Debian unstable.
Sources and debs are available at my project homepage:
http://home.comcast.net/~deathkrush
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
On 13-Aug-2005, Ryan Schultz wrote:
> KMuddy's documentation is now licensed under the GPL and I've
> uploaded -3 into my archives.
Thanks for following through on this, and congratulations on
successfully negotiating with the copyright holder.
--
\ "As far as the laws of mathematics refe
That's exactly what I did. I checked how other packages do the rules
file and it helped me a lot. Now I have a completely working Debian
package. It builds perfectly with debuild. As soon as I update my
software to 0.9.2 I will release the next Debian package.
Bruno Barrera C. wrote:
>On Fri, 200
> > And how you can be sure that it's gonna be rebuilt with new fltk?
> > Please put proper version in Build-Depends line. It's possible that some
> > autobuilders still have old version of -dev package.
>
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 12:16:31PM +0200, Morten Brix Pedersen wrote:
> As far as I know, th
On Saturday 13 August 2005 11:33 am, Ryan Schultz wrote:
> On Friday 12 August 2005 02:40 am, Ryan Schultz wrote:
> Okay, upstream's main developer has agreed to relicense under a DFSG-free
> license -- he has to check with the other documentation author yet, but he
> doesn't think it will be a pro
Prashanth wrote:
> Hello
Hi!
> I am trying to create my first debian package, a python C binding. When
> i run lintian on the changes file i get the following error. I have
> touched a COPYRIGHT file in the source directory. still the error
> remain. Sorry for the n00b question :(
An empty file
On Friday 12 August 2005 02:40 am, Ryan Schultz wrote:
> On Thursday 11 August 2005 10:14 pm, Andrew Saunders wrote:
> > The documentation in doc/en appears to be covered by the terms of the
> > GNU Free Documentation License which is widely considered to be
> > non-free[1]. That docbook file'll ne
Hello
I am trying to create my first debian package, a python C binding. When
i run lintian on the changes file i get the following error. I have
touched a COPYRIGHT file in the source directory. still the error
remain. Sorry for the n00b question :(
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian$ lintian -i -v pyth
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 08:13:34PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
> Version: 0.4.0pre2.ds.3-2
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: low
> Maintainer: LI Daobing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Changed-By: LI Daobing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Description:
> qterm - BBS client for X Window System written in Qt
> Cha
but they are really exist, anyone know why?
$ dpkg -L qterm | grep pixmaps
/usr/share/pixmaps
/usr/share/pixmaps/qterm_16x16.xpm
/usr/share/pixmaps/qterm_32x32.xpm
On 8/13/05, Neil McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 08:13:34PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
> > W: qterm; The
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 08:13:34PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
> W: qterm; The command /usr/bin/qterm"
> icon32x32="/usr/share/pixmaps/qterm_32x32.xpm"
> icon16x16="/usr/share/pixmaps/qterm_16x16.xpm listed in a menu file
> does not exist.
>
Hi there,
It looks like /usr/share/pixmaps/qterm_32x32.xp
Version: 0.4.0pre2.ds.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: LI Daobing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: LI Daobing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
qterm - BBS client for X Window System written in Qt
Changes:
qterm (0.4.0pre2.ds.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* ABI transition
On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 21:52 -0700, Stan Vasilyev wrote:
> Thanks for the comments. I already know how to use debuilder for C++
> programs that install via ./configure, make and install. But my program
> is a simple script and it doesn't have any of that. I will try to figure
> out how to package it
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 01:13:11PM +0200, Armin Berres wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:15:41AM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > If you rerun autoconf/automake/libtool at package build-time, when you don't
> > need to, what you get are large diffs against upstream every tim
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:15:41AM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> If you rerun autoconf/automake/libtool at package build-time, when you don't
> need to, what you get are large diffs against upstream every time a new
> version of the autotools becomes available. Aside from wast
Hi Bartosz,
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 12:31:03PM +0200, Morten Brix Pedersen wrote:
>> Hi,
>
> Hello.
>
>> I already have a flpsed package in unstable. Unfortunately my usual
>> sponsor, Bill Allombert, is unavailable to do a new upload.
>>
>> The new package fixes grave bug #321430 (uninstallable
Sven Mueller wrote:
> You should check your package with lintian and linda to make sure
> you don't miss anything ;-)
>
> W: polymer: description-starts-with-leading-spaces
> W: polymer: package-has-a-duplicate-relation depends: libqt3c102-mt
> (>= 3:3.3.4), libqt3c102-mt (>= 3)
Thanks for the h
17 matches
Mail list logo
