kamaraju kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I intend to package gnuplotfortran whose upstream is available at
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/gnuplotfortran .The upstream released
> sources whose version is 0.2.2-1 .
>
> My questions are
>
> 1) What would be the corresponding Debian version
* kamaraju kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050729 01:49]:
> I intend to package gnuplotfortran whose upstream is available at
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/gnuplotfortran .The upstream released
> sources whose version is 0.2.2-1 .
>
> My questions are
>
> 1) What would be the corresponding
I intend to package gnuplotfortran whose upstream is available at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/gnuplotfortran .The upstream released
sources whose version is 0.2.2-1 .
My questions are
1) What would be the corresponding Debian version? Should it be
0.2.2-1-1 or should i pretend the upstrea
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 16:14 -0600, Bruce Sass wrote:
> solved above by keeping track of packages which should not be
> installed
I suggested a simple way to do this: actually install a no-X
package. There may indeed be a better way than this.
The important thing to realise is that Debian is in
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 08:17:16AM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> > I'd rather set no recommendation at all, or conflict with old
> > udev...
> The former, by the way, makes perfect sense for something that isn't
> absolutely required and will be a complete
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, skaller wrote:
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 11:22 -0600, Bruce Sass wrote:
<...>
Can dpkg/apt/etc. be tweaked to automatically Provides: no-* ?
Two methods, one is not tenable:
(a) X conflicts with no-X implicitly
no-X doesn't really "conflicts" with X, there is an
exclusive
Hi, all
There was one policy for php libs ?
This was last message that I found about this.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/09/msg00109.html
And about PEAR libs ?
Thanks
Jose Carlos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
Hi Marco,
you might have a look at the Debian GIS project at
http://pkg-grass.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl. They maintain their
own package repository and make sure all GIS classes and functions work
together.
Thanks,
Jochen
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Marco Tulio Gontijo e Silva wrote:
> Hello,
Hello,
I've submitted an ITP[1] and packaged[2] the terralib[3] library.
Terralib is the reference library in the GIS community, and it's being
widely used.
[1]: http://bugs.debian.org/318961
[2]: http://www.dcc.ufmg.br/~marcot/debian/terralib/
[3]: http://www.terralib.org/
I'll be grateful if s
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 10:45:31AM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Martin v. Loewis wrote:
> > Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> >>- What's the current best practice of linking doc and library packages?
> > I don't know; how can I find out? Neither section 7 nor section 12.3
> > of the Policy Manual seem to
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> Thomas Viehmann wrote:
>>- If you read Matthew's FAQ, you'll find that the copyright file isn't
>> correct.
> Can you please point me to my error. I read the FAQ, and I read the
> copyright file, and I cannot discover any indescrepancy.
Sorry, it's in the Sponsorship Check
Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> - If you read Matthew's FAQ, you'll find that the copyright file isn't
> correct.
Can you please point me to my error. I read the FAQ, and I read the
copyright file, and I cannot discover any indescrepancy.
> - You're #249071 has "127.0.0.1" in the comment but "localhos
12 matches
Mail list logo
