I just adopted python-xlib, fixed the outstanding bugs, and put
the revised package at
http://www.dcl.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/debian/source/python-xlib_0.12-5.diff.gz
http://www.dcl.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/debian/source/python-xlib_0.12-5.dsc
Now I'm looking for a sponsor that helps me uploading the packag
2005/7/25, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 10:57:03PM -0300, Dani wrote:
> > Hi! where I find tutorials for made gcc *.deb's?
> > Thank you very much!
> Debian is a so-called "binary distribution", which means that most
> users just download the .debs and ne
Neil Williams escreveu isso aí:
> I use doxygen for source code documentation but DocBook for manpages - I
> haven't used doxygen for both. In the doxygen comments, it is v.common to use
> -1 - does doxygen work with the recommended escape value?
>
> > N: '-' must be escaped ('\-') to be inter
On 26-Jul-2005, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> I'd like my em8300 package's dependencies to say something like "If you
> use udev, I'd recommend you use at least 0.060-1."
> [...]
> I would translate it to "I'd recommend you have either no udev
> installed, or at least version 0.060-1.".
> [...]
> "Reco
Hi,
I'd like my em8300 package's dependencies to say something like "If you
use udev, I'd recommend you use at least 0.060-1." (since specific rules
for the em8300 drivers were added in that release, tahnks to Marco
d'Itri).
Unfortunately, the package system certainly can't guess whether udev
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 01:08:02AM +0200, Roland Gruber wrote:
> Hi Geert,
>
> Geert Stappers schrieb:
> > Please avoid "notes", make unattended installs possible.
>
> you are right, if possible then notes should be avoided.
>
> But the problem is that the package is not usable after the upgrade
Hi Geert,
Geert Stappers schrieb:
> Please avoid "notes", make unattended installs possible.
you are right, if possible then notes should be avoided.
But the problem is that the package is not usable after the upgrade
because the user has to recreate some configuration files.
The application has
To send mail to me, you need to add [laundry] to the end of the
subject line (eg: Subject: Random message [laundry]).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Brian,
thanks for reply. I've rebuilt aspell-uz taking into account your
feedback. Please have a look, it is at
http://www.uni-bremen.de/~kmashrab/aspell/deb/
It passed lintian -i test, but linda -i complained about l-uz.cmap file
being installed into /usr/lib.
Thanks,
Mashrab.
--
Mashrab K
Cedric Pradalier wrote on 24/07/2005 02:11:
> I've seen bbpager is now orphaned and I'd like to take up
> the maintainance. I've packaged 0.4.0 (current is 0.3.1) and
> lintian is happy.
I don't actually think that lintian is completely happy with your
package. At least if you ran it with
lintian
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 10:57:03PM -0300, Dani wrote:
> Hi! where I find tutorials for made gcc *.deb's?
> Thank you very much!
Debian is a so-called "binary distribution", which means that most
users just download the .debs and never need to deal with compiling
from source.
If you wa
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 08:10:07PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
>
> Maybe you want to think about these two alternatives:
>
> - add the debconf message to the package in general (a note like: If you
> are upgrading from a version below ..." ) and done
Please avoid "notes", make unattended ins
On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 03:48 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> Oh, I didn't mean to imply you couldn't have more than one of these
> libraries. Same as you're planning to perhaps have more than one
> object file. It's really the same thing, but I think it makes life
> easier for people doing manual
Am Montag, den 25.07.2005, 18:40 +0200 schrieb Roland Gruber:
> probably this has been asked before but my searches did not give proper
> results.
>
> I want to display a message to the user via debconf. The message should
> only appear if the user upgrades from a version below a special value
>
Margarita Manterola schrieb:
> As shown in the Upgrading diagram I made some time ago [1], and also,
> as it is explained in the Debian Policy [2], when doing an upgrade,
> the maintainer scripts are called with a second parameter that
> indicates the package version.
thanks a lot for your fast he
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 02:08:02PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> > Is there a standard way to get the old package version and compare it to
> > the new one?
>
> As shown in the Upgrading diagram I made some time ago [1], and also,
> as it is explained in the Debian Policy [2], when doing an
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 03:04:24AM +0300, Eng. Mina Ramses wrote:
> Hey,
> In order to be advocated by such a sponsor, I knew that I have to
> contact this email with information related to my work, my work is to
> giving support for the OMAP ARM310 Arch. Under Debian , I'm working on
> porting the
On 7/25/05, Roland Gruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to display a message to the user via debconf. The message should
> only appear if the user upgrades from a version below a special value
> (0.5.0 in my case).
> Is there a standard way to get the old package version and compare it to
>
Hi all,
probably this has been asked before but my searches did not give proper
results.
I want to display a message to the user via debconf. The message should
only appear if the user upgrades from a version below a special value
(0.5.0 in my case).
My first attempt was to check if some directo
I will be in Lisbon and around for about a week in the first half of
August for holidays. If people would need to meet for keysigning, please
let me know in time, we could arrange for a date.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
Symantec AntiVirus a détecté un virus dans une pièce jointe que vous
(debian-mentors@lists.debian.org) avez envoyée à [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pour garantir que les destinataires pourront utiliser les fichiers envoyés,
lancez une analyse des virus sur votre ordinateur, nettoyez les fichiers
infecté
This pre-recorded message is being sent in response to your recent
email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All routine administrative requests (including subscriptions and
unsubscriptions) concerning this mailing list are handled by an
automated server. Please read this message carefully to find the
informati
Dear ITtoolbox Subscriber,
Per the changes noted below, your message has NOT been distributed to the
SAP-R3-Log group. Instead, you will need to resubmit it to the appropriate
individual SAP-R3-Log topic.
THE FOLLOWING IMPORTANT CHANGES WILL BE IN EFFECT STARTING WEDNESDAY,
MARCH 5, 2003. PLEAS
[skaller]
> Ouch.. main in a library .. well, actually that's an interesting idea
> you describe .. but .. (lol):
Right, there's no inherent reason main can't go in a library, same as
any other global function or variable.
> I don't want to do that because it makes sense only if there is
> reall
24 matches
Mail list logo
