Re: Re: Your product

2005-07-01 Thread submit
*** This is an automatic message - DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE *** x-xxx-x.com http://www.x-xxx-x.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: coldfire: packages URL

2005-07-01 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, Eugeniy Meshcheryakov wrote: > You probably also need build-depend on docbook-to-man package (for > manpage generation). Added. I also changed the Standards-Version to 3.6.2 and section to main. I'm currently setting up a pbuilder environment but it seems that debootstrap isn'

Re: RFS: coldfire: packages URL

2005-07-01 Thread Eugeniy Meshcheryakov
30 червня 2005 о 16:32 -0300 Claudio Matsuoka написав(-ла): > > 2. control file have 'Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), > > autotools-dev'. Generated .deb have 'Depends: ... libncurses5 (>= 5.4-5), > > libreadline5'. > > Are you sure you do not need other packages in Build-Depends:? > > Fixed.

Re: RFS: coldfire: packages URL

2005-07-01 Thread Eugeniy Meshcheryakov
One more thing: why you use section contrib for that package? I see that other emulators that do not require some non-free ROMs are in section 'main' (qemu, gxemul, pearpc, bochs). And see http://www.nl.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html#s-bpp-desc-basics about ho

Re: RFS: coldfire: packages URL

2005-07-01 Thread Philipp Kern
On 01.07.2005, at 15:42, Justin Pryzby wrote: Anyone know of a good pseudopackage on which to clone this bug to prevent acceptance of any package with such a standards-version? Is ftp an appropriate place? You could file a wishlist bug on ``ftp.debian.org'' but I doubt that it would get impl

Re: RFS: coldfire: packages URL

2005-07-01 Thread Justin Pryzby
Subject: rpncalc: Standards-Version > Max-Standards_Version Package: rpncalc Severity: normal On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 10:23:38PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > On 30.06.2005, at 21:32, Claudio Matsuoka wrote: > >Changed to 3.6.2.1, which I assume it's the latest policy manual > >version. > >I noti

Re: unable to comprehend linda errors

2005-07-01 Thread kamaraju kusumanchi
Nigel Jones wrote: On 01/07/05, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hallo kamaraju, * kamaraju kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-01 07:51]: I am trying to build my first package for Debian. It is called fortranposix. The upstream source for this library is located at http:/

Re: Bug#316503: ITP: istanbul -- Desktop session recorder

2005-07-01 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On 7/1/05, Luca Bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Package name: istanbul > Version : 0.1.0 > Upstream Author : Zaheer Abbas Merali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://live.gnome.org/istanbul > * License : GPL > Description : Desktop session recorder >

Re: RFS: coldfire: packages URL

2005-07-01 Thread Neil McGovern
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 04:32:59PM -0300, Claudio Matsuoka wrote: > Thanks for reviewing, fixed packages were uploaded to the same location > (http://tweek.dyndns.org:8080/stuff/coldfire/). Is there an automated way > to check for common errors such as missing build dependencies? > Yup :) See th