Hi,
> > The library package guide should tell you to use
> >
> > libspf-1.0-0
>
> Note that the question was about the -dev package naming, which is
> not really explained in your excellent FAQ.
>
> PS: also, will you ever incorporate the shell script snippet by
> Steve Langasek I sent you, w
The upstream folks are planning to split cogito and git into two separate
packages. I requested (and they seemed to agree) that they change the
package name from git to something else before then. Hopefully they'll
see the light and try to play nice with the rest of the world.
Hmm... It look
On 15.06.2005, at 21:28, Roger Leigh wrote:
Major gripe: you build-confict and build-depend upon autoconf and
automake. There should not be *any* need to run these and build time.
If you do alter Makefile.ams or configure.ac, run the autotools on
your system, and have the changes included in the
Am Mittwoch, den 15.06.2005, 20:28 +0100 schrieb Roger Leigh:
> Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This is an discussion request for Gtk+Extra 2.0 (Bug #313614). A RFS
> > will follow, after fixing last issues.
>
> > First I am interested in feedback regarding the quality of this pa
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Anthony Towns wrote:
Steve Greenland wrote:
On 12-Jun-05, 02:27 (CDT), Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You need to convince either git or GNU Interactive Tools
to change its name upstream then. Since git is the newcomer
and its name is already taken (by a GNU proj
ild much
more simple and reliable.
Your package also fails to autobuild. Please check the build
dependencies (dpatch missing?) and test building with sbuild and/or
pbuilder. Here's the build log:
Automatic build of gtk+extra-2.0_2.0.0-0dl0 on hardknott by sbuild/powe
Hello,
This is an discussion request for Gtk+Extra 2.0 (Bug #313614). A RFS
will follow, after fixing last issues.
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> * Package name: gtk+extra-2.0
> Version : 2.0.0
> Upstream Author : Adrian E. Feiguin
> * URL : http://gtkext
On 15.06.2005, at 01:51, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
The library package guide should tell you to use
If it doesn't, that's an error in the guide;
but I would also first check the SONAME of the library.
Exactly, but I do not recall that it mentions the name of the
corresponding dev package, but I d
also sprach Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.06.15.0151 +0200]:
> The library package guide should tell you to use
>
> libspf-1.0-0
Note that the question was about the -dev package naming, which is
not really explained in your excellent FAQ.
PS: also, will you ever incorporate the shel
9 matches
Mail list logo
