Steve Greenland wrote:
On 12-Jun-05, 02:27 (CDT), Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You need to convince either git or GNU Interactive Tools
to change its name upstream then. Since git is the newcomer
and its name is already taken (by a GNU project no less!)
perhaps you could start there
Hi,
> A package that installs /usr/lib/libspf-1.0.so.0.0.0 should be names
> libspf-1.0-0 from all I can tell. The policy does not dictate how
> the -dev (and -doc) package should be named. I would prefer not to
> call it libspf-dev but rather encode the version.
>
> The library packaging guide s
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 05:28:34AM +1000, John Skaller wrote:
> I am seeking some input on the state of the following package:
>
> Package Name: felix
> Version: 1.1.0
> Upstream author: John Skaller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Licence: BSD
> Description: high performance programming language translator
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 02:01:42PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 11:09:14AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > No you don't. You have one per entry in the sources.list. As I said
> > even the same version can make apt-get build-dep fail. Two versions,
> > like when
Hi,
A career imperitive here about ocaml langugae for audience of those
unfamiliar with Mathematica, Maple, Matlab. (sorry, I know, not a package
issue. But the packagers themselves are important too ;)
Mathematica is the unargued best mathematics language kernel and GUI front
end. It's also a
I am seeking some input on the state of the following package:
Package Name: felix
Version: 1.1.0
Upstream author: John Skaller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Licence: BSD
Description: high performance programming language translator and tools
Source and amd64 binaries can be found at:
http://felix.sf.net/
also sprach Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.06.14.1658 +0200]:
> Just looking it up in the old thread "Library package naming" I saw
> that you told me not to use -release at all when packaging a shared
> library.
Lol. Oh, *that* thread. :)
Yeah, I maintain that -release is not good b
On 14.06.2005, at 14:47, martin f krafft wrote:
Do you have a pointer to the discussion?
Just looking it up in the old thread "Library package naming" I saw
that you told me not to use -release at all when packaging a shared
library. But yes, the naming of the dev package is not explicitly
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 14:02:03 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I see no problem with autobuilders and virtual build-dependencies since
> they're supposed to be configured with just unstable repositories.
Actually, I think autobuilders also have an apt source for the incoming
directory on ftp
also sprach Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.06.13.2301 +0200]:
> If you see the -release bit as the API version you should name
> your dev package libspf-1.0-dev. That was at least what I was
> advised to do when I had the same problem some weeks ago.
Do you have a pointer to the discussi
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 11:09:14AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> No you don't. You have one per entry in the sources.list. As I said
> even the same version can make apt-get build-dep fail. Two versions,
> like when you just uploaded a new one that a local mirror doesn't have
> yet or users
Do you want to see real amateurs who have webcams
on their computers in their dorm rooms? This is
not one of those sites with professional girls who
get paid to do this in front of the camera, these
are the average girls next door, at college, trying
to make money and meet guys!
Get free acce
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
>> > Packages and source can be pulled from http://www.tzi.de/~jmm/debian/
>>
>> A fixed source package with the missing build dependency on
>> libsdl-gfx-1.2.dev has been uploaded.
>
> No, it has not...
Doh, it had, but into the wrong directory...
Fixed.
Cheers,
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 12:40:51PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> apt-get complains if there is more than one source of the provides
>> (even two sources with the same name/version). sbuild then picks the
>> first choice apt lists for the pro
14 matches
Mail list logo
