> Those 2 bugs are ITP.
> Have you contacted those people before doing your package?
> As I know, Gromacs ITP is active. There is no version on Debian because of a
> bug on Gromacs. Nicholas Breen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> already did a package.
> Take a better look on the ITPs.
Ouch... I've missed Ni
Hi
> I'm looking for a sponsorship for this package. It would be much appreciated.
>
> It will close href="http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=228319";>#228319
> and href="http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=252101";>#252101
> wishlist bugs.
Those 2 bugs are ITP.
Have
On 17-May-2005, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Ben Finney [Tue, 17 May 2005 12:00:38 +1000]:
> > That's exactly what I need help with. What should I do to decide
> > "here's a bunch of hand-rolled stuff that has a direct or indirect
> > debhelper replacement"?
>
> debhelper(7) contains a list of all the
* Ben Finney [Tue, 17 May 2005 12:00:38 +1000]:
> On 17-May-2005, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > * Ben Finney [Tue, 17 May 2005 11:35:56 +1000]:
> > > I'd like to submit patches for a couple of packages that currently use
> > > hand-rolled debian/rules files.
> > Which packages, and why?
> I'd rather n
On 17-May-2005, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> I don't think there's really consensus on it, but from personal
> experience, I highly favour debhelper for reasons of least surprise:
This seems a good reason, thanks.
On 17-May-2005, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Ben Finney [Tue, 17 May 2005 11:35:56 +1
On 17-May-2005, Adrian Mastronardi wrote:
> Package: gromacs
> License: GPL
> Description: GROMACS - Molecular Dynamics Simulator
The synopsis (first line of the Description field) should be a
noun-phrase, and should not repeat the package name. When writing it,
you should imagine your synopsis be
* Ben Finney [Tue, 17 May 2005 11:35:56 +1000]:
> I'd like to submit patches for a couple of packages that currently use
> hand-rolled debian/rules files.
Which packages, and why? I mean, there are very cleanly packaged files
that don't use debhelper nor cdbs (see e.g. make). But there can be
I'm looking for a sponsorship for this package. It would be much appreciated.
It will close http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=228319";>#228319
and http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=252101";>#252101
wishlist bugs.
Package: gromacs
License: GPL
Description: GROMACS -
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 11:35:56AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> I'd like to submit patches for a couple of packages that currently use
> hand-rolled debian/rules files. Is the current best practise to use
> debhelper, or cdbs, or something else?
I don't think there's really consensus on it, but from
Howdy mentors,
I'd like to submit patches for a couple of packages that currently use
hand-rolled debian/rules files. Is the current best practise to use
debhelper, or cdbs, or something else?
Any existing "things to check" document for moving to either or both
of these systems?
--
\ "Ours
qterm (0.4.0pre2-0.3) unstable; urgency=low
* NMU.
* Add icon. (closes: #289970)
* del admin/CVS.
* debian/control
- update Standards-Version to 3.6.1.
- update debhelper to 4.1.0(statisfy compat and cdbs)
* del debian/manpage.1.ex debian/manpage.sgml.ex
-- Li Daobing <[EMAIL P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi David,
As Ben said to me:
You still need to differentiate between what you get from the upstream
package source (the foo.orig.tar.gz file) and your own changes as
package maintainer (the foo.diff.gz file). The only common exception
is for a packag
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Nobody interested in sponsoring QSF? :-/
Thanks
Nelson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCiSkoAQwuptkwlkQRAk4nAJ9xb+4bEL2UuvnzZNy9/Pg3hVpvnQCaAz1p
xl9U+Z+4tV2jjPw7ros1Tho=
=Hfj/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-
Hello,
First thing to say, this is not really a RFS, more like a RFT (request
for tester). I made two packages (descriptions will follow). First one was
for a program I wrote with some friends, second one is the libssh made
by Aris, which we depends on and were not Debian-packaged.
What I wou
Quoting "Nelson A. de Oliveira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
BTW. I am aware that lintian complains about the presence of the
CVS directory
in the source package. That is how it came from upstream.
Suggestions on how
to deal with this would be welcome.
You need to remove the CVS dirs from the source c
> BTW. I am aware that lintian complains about the presence of the CVS
> directory
> in the source package. That is how it came from upstream. Suggestions on how
> to deal with this would be welcome.
You need to remove the CVS dirs from the source coded and repack it. Then use
this "modified"
A sponsorship for this package would be much appreciated.
Package name: cyrus2courier
License: BSD (w/ annoying advertising clause)
Description: converts Cyrus mailbox format to Maildir
cyrus2courier is a nice little tool to convert a single mailbox from
Cyrus-Imap (versions 1.5.x, 1.6.x, 2.0 an
Lindsay Lohan prefers Rolex, Cartier and Breitling
http://Hewett.b5t.net/r/vron/bumptious.html
Sell Rolex Replicas to your friends
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all!
I'm requesting a sponsor for the waste-daemon package.
From the ITP:
"* Package name: waste
Version : 1.5b3
Upstream Author : Waste Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://waste.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : Software product and p
sshs.. get low cost software cds or download!
http://koox.ovsl95ozlg6vlpo.rumbumbale.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
20 matches
Mail list logo
