Re: file permission

Oops, I thought I sent this about 12 hours ago.. On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 02:03:09PM +0200, Charles Majola wrote: > martin f krafft wrote: > > >also sprach Charles Majola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.18.1202 +0100]: > > > > > >>how does dephelper handle file permissions? issit or to have a > >>fi

Re: klibido - usenet binary grabber for KDE

On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 06:50:52PM +0100, Gon?ri Le Bouder wrote: > Hello Mentors, > > Klibido[1] is a usenet binary grabber written in c++ by Alessandro > "bauno" Bonometti . > Sounds good, I'll take a look at it for you. Regards, Neil McGovern -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of

klibido - usenet binary grabber for KDE

Hello Mentors, Klibido[1] is a usenet binary grabber written in c++ by Alessandro "bauno" Bonometti . I packaged it and would like to maintain it for Debian. The package is lintian valid and respects the Debian Policy, except for this warning caused by CVS directory in upstream package (The auth

Including object (.o) files in a package - linda errors

Hi list, I am packaging mn_fit (source package is named mn-fit; currently stuck in NEW). Upstream tells me that the capability exists for users to create a customized version of mn_fit by linking their own Fortran source code with mn_fit static libraries and the mn_fit main object file, mn_main_k

Re: file permission

also sprach Charles Majola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.18.1303 +0100]: > man dh_fixperms : doesn't say anything about files in > /etc/dev.d/block/*; postinst is not a good way issit ? The files should be 0644. If the `make install` run does not install them there with proper permissions, or you u

Re: file permission

martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Charles Majola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.18.1202 +0100]: how does dephelper handle file permissions? issit or to have a file with +x by defaut before building. or must it be changed during or after installation/configuration? man dh_fixperms anything e

Re: file permission

also sprach Charles Majola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.18.1202 +0100]: > how does dephelper handle file permissions? issit or to have a file with > +x by defaut before building. > or must it be changed during or after installation/configuration? man dh_fixperms anything else must be done manual

file permission

Hi, how does dephelper handle file permissions? issit or to have a file with +x by defaut before building. or must it be changed during or after installation/configuration? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Source code extracted to current directory

also sprach Nelson A. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.17.2102 +0100]: > But how do I create the debian/ directory, if dh_make fails on that > situation? mkdir - cd - tar xfz ../.tar.gz dh_make -f ../.tar.gz ... -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`.

Building packages using tar and ar (was: About control files)

Hello! On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 06:05:14PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > [...] > ... if you use dh_gencontrol(1), or invoke dpkg-gencontrol manually. Of > course a package can also be created along > > mkdir tmp > cp whatnot/ tmp/ > mkdir tmp/DEBIAN > cat >tmp/DEBIAN/control > type whatever you li