Re: Is it tolerated to have compiled libraries in a package?

Hi, package is anyway already in contrib. So OK!? Eric Steve Langasek wrote: On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 11:35:22AM -0800, Matt Brubeck wrote: Eric Lavarde wrote: the new version of FreeMind is coming with a whole lot of pre-compiled libraries (jar files to be precise). Some of these libraries already

RFS: stress

Source: stress Section: devel Priority: optional Maintainer: Amos Waterland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.2.0) Standards-Version: 3.6.1.0 Package: stress Architecture: any Depends: ${shlibs:Depends} Description: A tool which imposes stress on a system 'stress' is a tool which

Re: Need advice wrt #295306

* Frank Küster [Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:11:18 +0100]: > Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrotee: > > - : this is truely horrible, moreover, postrm files may live elsewhere > Where should they live? There is dpkg --root and dpkg --admindir, both of which can be specified from /etc/dpkg/dpkg.

Re: Need advice wrt #295306

* Frank Küster [Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:32:54 +0100]: > But you forgot to > remove the cache file after postinst used it. Of course, thanks for spotting. :) -- Adeodato Simó EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621 When you don't know what to do, walk fast and look worried. -- To UNSUBS

hello

hello, world -- ZAK B. ELEP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- 1024D/FA53851D 1486 7957 454D E529 E4F1 F75E 5787 B1FD FA53 851D -- Running Debian GNU+Linux testing/unstable. GnuPG signed mail preferred. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: Can't make a proper Debian package of a library

On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 12:38:12AM +, Noel Torres wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Justin Pryzby escribió: > > | Okay, can you make the build tree, including debian/, publicly > | available for us to scrutinize? > | > | Justin > | > | > > http://envite.rolamasao.o

Re: Can't make a proper Debian package of a library

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Justin Pryzby escribió: | Okay, can you make the build tree, including debian/, publicly | available for us to scrutinize? | | Justin | | http://envite.rolamasao.org/~envite/ Thanks for all Noel -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/L

Re: Can't make a proper Debian package of a library

On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 11:57:42PM +, Noel Torres wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Justin Pryzby escribió: > > | On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 11:25:24PM +, Noel Torres wrote: > |> Justin Pryzby escribió: > |> | On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 10:42:22PM +, Noel Torres w

Re: Can't make a proper Debian package of a library

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Justin Pryzby escribió: | On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 11:25:24PM +, Noel Torres wrote: |> Justin Pryzby escribió: |> | On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 10:42:22PM +, Noel Torres wrote: |> |> Justin Pryzby escribió: |> |> | On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:59:20PM

Re: Can't make a proper Debian package of a library

On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 11:25:24PM +, Noel Torres wrote: > Justin Pryzby escribió: > | On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 10:42:22PM +, Noel Torres wrote: > |> Justin Pryzby escribió: > |> | On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:59:20PM +, Noel Torres wrote: > Yes, I created the two .deb files. But they does

Re: Can't make a proper Debian package of a library

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Justin Pryzby escribió: | On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 10:42:22PM +, Noel Torres wrote: |> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- |> Hash: SHA1 |> |> Justin Pryzby escribió: |> |> | On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:59:20PM +, Noel Torres wrote: |> |> Can someb

Re: Can't make a proper Debian package of a library

On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 10:42:22PM +, Noel Torres wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Justin Pryzby escribió: > > | On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:59:20PM +, Noel Torres wrote: > |> Can somebody help me to package it? I want it to become (some day) a > |> piece of Deb

Re: Can't make a proper Debian package of a library

On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:59:20PM +, Noel Torres wrote: > Can somebody help me to package it? I want it to become (some day) a > piece of Debian. Yes, we will do our best to help you. I think everyone here would prefer that you ask specific questions on-list, and we will reply on-list. That

Re: Can't make a proper Debian package of a library

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Justin Pryzby escribió: | On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:59:20PM +, Noel Torres wrote: |> Can somebody help me to package it? I want it to become (some day) a |> piece of Debian. | Yes, we will do our best to help you. I think everyone here would | pre

Can't make a proper Debian package of a library

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Please, CC me in the answer, I'm not subscribed to the list. I want to become a new Debian developer, starting with the maintaining of the Debian version of my own code. I tried to follow the "New Maintainers' Guide" but it didn't help me, 'cos my

Re: RFS: bookmarkbridge

It would be nice if it would support Galeon... ThatÅ the first whishlist bug here :) -- .''`. What does not destroy me, makes me stronger. - Nietzsche : :' : `. `'Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (Sid 2.6.10 Ext3) `- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com

Re: Need advice wrt #295306

Le Ven 25 Février 2005 17:32, Frank Küster a écrit : > Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Pierre Habouzit [Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:50:54 +0100]: > >> - : this is really not trivial : inetd.conf is sorted by > >> categories, and it will be really difficult to put the entries at > >> the ri

Re: common function handling in maintainer scripts

Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This one time, at band camp, Frank Küster said: >> For the teTeX-3.0 packages, I have taken a different approach, inspired >> by Davide Salvetti's nice auctex package: All the maintainer scripts, >> and even debian/rules, are created by e-Perl from their c

Re: common function handling in maintainer scripts

This one time, at band camp, Frank Küster said: > Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > > Hello all, > > > > I have a source package that generates multiple binary packages. > > Since the packages are similar in a lot of ways (config file structure, > > handling of config files, etc), I ha

Re: common function handling in maintainer scripts

This one time, at band camp, martin f krafft said: > also sprach Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.25.0032 +0100]: > > The second question is (on a completely unrelated note): is there > > any problem with assuming the presence of a color capable $TERM > > Yes. > > > and is > > anything l

Re: Need advice wrt #295306

Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Pierre Habouzit [Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:50:54 +0100]: >> - : this is really not trivial : inetd.conf is sorted by categories, >> and it will be really difficult to put the entries at the right >> place in the postinst > > In fact, is not ve

Re: Need advice wrt #295306

Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrotee: > The only way is to do some hackish things in the since > it's the only script that will be called before the buggy > > until here, it's OK. but I readlly dunno which hack I have to implement > int the preinst. I have (at least) two choices, but I d

Re: RFS: bookmarkbridge

Hi. on 02/25/05 11:50, pabs wrote: > Hi, > > >>Added debian/bookmarkbridge.doc-base. >>up-loaded it. >>http://moonlinux.sourceforge.jp/debian/ > > > Looks good :) > thank you. > Perhaps put the html in /usr/share/doc/bookmarkbridge/html/ > so as to not clutter /usr/share/doc/bookmarkbridge?

Re: Need advice wrt #295306 (Was: debian/uw-imapd-ssl.postinst clobbers existing imaps line params)

* Pierre Habouzit [Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:50:54 +0100]: > - : this is really not trivial : inetd.conf is sorted by categories, > and it will be really difficult to put the entries at the right > place in the postinst In fact, is not very difficult, since you just feed update-inetd the

Re: Need advice wrt #295306 (Was: debian/uw-imapd-ssl.postinst clobbers existing imaps line params)

> here is the full explanation : > http://www.madism.org/~madcoder/295306.txt does anybody has any advice ? I explain it here again : the #295306 is a bug agains uw-imapd-ssl, but in fact affects uw-imapd and ipopd/-ssl as well : in the postrm of those packages, update-inetd --remove is calle

Re: common function handling in maintainer scripts

also sprach Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.25.0032 +0100]: > My question is: can I source it in config as well? I suspect not, > because of the preconfigure run that apt does. I suppose if > I really wanted to do this, I could exit 0 at preconfigure time, > and only run it at configure

Re: common function handling in maintainer scripts

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >My question is: can I source it in config as well? I suspect not, >because of the preconfigure run that apt does. I suppose if I really >wanted to do this, I could exit 0 at preconfigure time, and only run it >at configure, but that seems

Re: common function handling in maintainer scripts

Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Hello all, > > I have a source package that generates multiple binary packages. > Since the packages are similar in a lot of ways (config file structure, > handling of config files, etc), I have a lot of functions that are the > same in several maintaine