Re: RFC: Packages Needing Sponsors page

2005-01-16 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tue, 4 Jan 2005 03:35:33 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 08:55:53PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm trying to clean up WNPP. >> >> As you may recall, I'm encouraging people to use

Re: RFS: mocp -- music on console player

2005-01-16 Thread Craig Small
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 12:15:08PM +0100, Michal Jeczalik Jr wrote: > I have already got a sponsor, sorry. No need to be sorry, glad you have one. - Craig -- Craig Small GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5 Eye-Net Consulting http://www.enc.com.au/ MIEE Debia

RFS: (2nd try) bmon - Command-line bandwidth monitor and rate estimator

2005-01-16 Thread Reto Schuettel
Hi I'm still looking for a sponsor for bmon. After my first try[0] I was asked to integrate some features provided by libnl[1]. Unfortunately I have no experiences with packaging libraries, and it looks like libnl isn't an easy one - I've talked with the upstream author and he refuses to maintain

Re: RFS: libapache2-mod-auth-kerb -- Apache2 module to authenticate connections using Kerberos

2005-01-16 Thread ms419
Yo, I hadn't been following your work on an Apache2 package. Please let me know if I can help. Regards, Jack Just take a look this: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=264231 Since libapache-* and libapache2-* share exactly the same code, it should be a a multibinary source package.

RFS: (temporary) zsync

2005-01-16 Thread Robert Lemmen
hi folks, my normal sponsor for zsync (client side rsync over http, cool) is on a vacation, could someone please upload for me? files are at http://www.semistable.com/files thanks robert -- Robert Lemmen http://www.semistable.com signature.asc Description: Digi

Re: renaming a library package (advice and sanity check)

2005-01-16 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: > > The point I was trying to make is that a libvips-doc which conflicts > and replaces libvips7.10-doc would force the removal of libvips7.10-doc > when doing "apt-get dist-upgrade", . . . I think this may

Re: renaming a library package (advice and sanity check)

2005-01-16 Thread Santiago Vila
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: > Santiago Vila wrote: > > > This way, "apt-get upgrade" will install libvips-doc without requiring > > "apt-get dist-upgrade", and this will be done automatically and > > without user intervention, > > Are you certain of that? My understanding is th