Hi, I'm looking for a sponsor for my packages mozilla-firefox-locale-es-es and
mozilla-firefox-locale-es-ar.
Currently there are no spanish translations of Firefox in the archive!!
* Package name: mozilla-firefox-locale-es-es
Version : 0.9.3
Upstream Author : Nave Project <[EMAIL
* Brian Sutherland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-03 01:09]:
> What is the best way to go about getting rid of package B? My first
> instinct is just to upload a new version of A (with new versions of
> X and Y) and then file a bug against ftp.debian.org?
>
> But my first instincts are often wrong.
Hi,
I have 2 source packages in the archive (unstable only) that are
branches of the same tree, but generate different backages.
e.g. source packages A and B which make packages X and Y
respectively.
I has bothered me to have such duplication and finally some work that
upstream did lets me gener
Hi, I'm looking for a sponsor for my packages mozilla-firefox-locale-es-es and
mozilla-firefox-locale-es-ar.
Currently there are no spanish translations of Firefox in the archive!!
* Package name: mozilla-firefox-locale-es-es
Version : 0.9.3
Upstream Author : Nave Project <[EMAIL
On Tue, 02 Nov 2004, Roland Gruber wrote:
> LAM is a webfrontend for managing LDAP accounts which is written in
> PHP. But there is also a small script included which allows to
> manage Quota etc.. This script uses the non-packaged Net::SSH::Perl
> module.
>
> So can I just close the bug because t
* Brian Sutherland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-03 01:09]:
> What is the best way to go about getting rid of package B? My first
> instinct is just to upload a new version of A (with new versions of
> X and Y) and then file a bug against ftp.debian.org?
>
> But my first instincts are often wrong.
Hi,
I have 2 source packages in the archive (unstable only) that are
branches of the same tree, but generate different backages.
e.g. source packages A and B which make packages X and Y
respectively.
I has bothered me to have such duplication and finally some work that
upstream did lets me gener
On Tue, 02 Nov 2004, Roland Gruber wrote:
> LAM is a webfrontend for managing LDAP accounts which is written in
> PHP. But there is also a small script included which allows to
> manage Quota etc.. This script uses the non-packaged Net::SSH::Perl
> module.
>
> So can I just close the bug because t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I got a bug report (#279371) for LDAP Account Manager (LAM) because
parts of the program use a specific Perl module which is not packaged
for Debian.
LAM is a webfrontend for managing LDAP accounts which is written in PHP.
But there is also
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I got a bug report (#279371) for LDAP Account Manager (LAM) because
parts of the program use a specific Perl module which is not packaged
for Debian.
LAM is a webfrontend for managing LDAP accounts which is written in PHP.
But there is also a sm
Hi fellows from d-m,
I've posted this already last week, but my sponsor (Andreas Metzler) hasn't
responded. At the risk of being seen as too impatient, I'd like to ask for
another sponsor to check my gtklp package, as the current package in testing
(0.9f-1) is too outdated, and the newer package
Hello,
This is an ocaml app and could be compiled to bytecode or natively on some
arches. Since the native build is not available on some arches and the
bytecode version could be compiled only one, I was told to follow the
spamoracle approach [1].
Sources:
SCM repo:
svn co svn://alioth.debia
Hi,
i'm in search of a sponsor for the following package
* Package name: gkrellmoon
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Dale P. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gkrellmoon.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : gkrellm plugin that shows the ph
Hi fellows from d-m,
I've posted this already last week, but my sponsor (Andreas Metzler) hasn't
responded. At the risk of being seen as too impatient, I'd like to ask for
another sponsor to check my gtklp package, as the current package in testing
(0.9f-1) is too outdated, and the newer package
Hello,
This is an ocaml app and could be compiled to bytecode or natively on some
arches. Since the native build is not available on some arches and the
bytecode version could be compiled only one, I was told to follow the
spamoracle approach [1].
Sources:
SCM repo:
svn co svn://alioth.debia
Hi,
i'm in search of a sponsor for the following package
* Package name: gkrellmoon
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Dale P. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gkrellmoon.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : gkrellm plugin that shows the ph
Package: maint-guide
Severity: wishlist
Version: N/A
On Saturday 30 October 2004 16.55, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> cjs:
> > I've read over the New
> > Maintainer's Guide [...]
> I think you'll want to read over the FAQ a little first:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html
I
also sprach Antonio S. de A. Terceiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.01.2337
+0100]:
> So, AFAIAK, I do know what I'm doing. ;-)
Yes, it looks like it. I'd be glad to look at your packages.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PRO
Package: maint-guide
Severity: wishlist
Version: N/A
On Saturday 30 October 2004 16.55, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> cjs:
> > I've read over the New
> > Maintainer's Guide [...]
> I think you'll want to read over the FAQ a little first:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html
I
also sprach Antonio S. de A. Terceiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.01.2337 +0100]:
> So, AFAIAK, I do know what I'm doing. ;-)
Yes, it looks like it. I'd be glad to look at your packages.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROT
20 matches
Mail list logo
