Hello,
Is there a doc/URL, which serves as guide for packaging kernel patches?
If so, I would appreciate a pointer.
I'm trying to package support for netdump (netconsole + dumping machine
state + memory dump over network). RedHat kernels have developed this
capability (and which is not available
Hi,
I am packaging a software which uses "ivmkmf" to generate the makefile.
I am trying to use the rules file to auto gen this makefile, but the
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot command fails, 'cause it tries to clean the
software even before the Makefile has been generated by ivmkmf.
Does anyone
[NB: I already posted this to d-m, but after a fresh reading of the d-m FAQ[1]
it was _very_ wrong for me to just post there. So, I'm sending this to you,
with some additions as per that FAQ (a little `spice' describing why this
package should be in Debian :). Kudos to you and Debian!]
Hi!
Here
[NB: I already posted this to d-m, but after a fresh reading of the d-m FAQ[1]
it was _very_ wrong for me to just post there. So, I'm sending this to you,
with some additions as per that FAQ (a little `spice' describing why this
package should be in Debian :). Kudos to you and Debian!]
Hi!
Here
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> I have question about handling of config.guess and config.sub in source
> package. I have read autotools-dev README.Debian. So I understand these
> need to be the latest ones whenever we compile the source.
Good :-)
> But why in clean target? This makes
On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 12:17, Brian Nelson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 01:59:03AM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 22:09, Brian Nelson wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 10:00:31PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 11:59:29AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
also sprach Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.25.2114 +0200]:
> But why in clean target? This makes large diff.gz with useless
> patch. Why not at the start of config.status after dh_testdir (or
> include it to dh_testdir.)?
It's in the clean target precisely so that it becomes part of the
Hi,
I have question about handling of config.guess and config.sub in source
package. I have read autotools-dev README.Debian. So I understand these
need to be the latest ones whenever we compile the source.
So far, I undestood rationales behind this.
But why in clean target? This makes large
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> I have question about handling of config.guess and config.sub in source
> package. I have read autotools-dev README.Debian. So I understand these
> need to be the latest ones whenever we compile the source.
Good :-)
> But why in clean target? This makes
On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 12:17, Brian Nelson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 01:59:03AM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 22:09, Brian Nelson wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 10:00:31PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 11:59:29AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
also sprach Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.25.2114 +0200]:
> But why in clean target? This makes large diff.gz with useless
> patch. Why not at the start of config.status after dh_testdir (or
> include it to dh_testdir.)?
It's in the clean target precisely so that it becomes part of the
Hi,
I have question about handling of config.guess and config.sub in source
package. I have read autotools-dev README.Debian. So I understand these
need to be the latest ones whenever we compile the source.
So far, I undestood rationales behind this.
But why in clean target? This makes large
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 01:59:03AM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 22:09, Brian Nelson wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 10:00:31PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 11:59:29AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > >
> > > > Okay, I've renamed this to "orbitalsniper
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 01:59:03AM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 22:09, Brian Nelson wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 10:00:31PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 11:59:29AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > >
> > > > Okay, I've renamed this to "orbitalsniper
Hi,
> And are there any tools to create them automatically?
apt-ftparchive, for example.
best regards,
sbeyer
--
Stephan Beyer 0xFCC5040F
IANADD http://www.noxa.de/~sbeyer/debian/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 22:09, Brian Nelson wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 10:00:31PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 11:59:29AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >
> > > Okay, I've renamed this to "orbitalsniper" and adjusted the sources to
> > > match.
> >
> > One thing that sto
Hi,
> And are there any tools to create them automatically?
apt-ftparchive, for example.
best regards,
sbeyer
--
Stephan Beyer 0xFCC5040F
IANADD http://www.noxa.de/~sbeyer/debian/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 22:09, Brian Nelson wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 10:00:31PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 11:59:29AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >
> > > Okay, I've renamed this to "orbitalsniper" and adjusted the sources to
> > > match.
> >
> > One thing that sto
18 matches
Mail list logo
