Re: RFS: asc - turn-based strategy game

On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 08:32:24AM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: > I'm looking for one-time-sponsor for my package asc. > Usually Matthew Palmer uploads asc package for me, but he doesn't respond > for my mails so I'm looking for someone else to upload it this time. I haven't gotten any e

Re: RFS: asc - turn-based strategy game

On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 08:32:24AM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: > I'm looking for one-time-sponsor for my package asc. > Usually Matthew Palmer uploads asc package for me, but he doesn't respond > for my mails so I'm looking for someone else to upload it this time. I haven't gotten any e

Re: Looking for a sponser for aeromail package

Erik Schanze wrote: Russell Kliese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I would like to maintain the aeromail package that is currently orphaned. I am not a debian maintainer and therefore am looking for a sponsor. I also had a look over aeromail a while ago. (See bug #229960) Please let me tell my

Re: Looking for a sponser for aeromail package

Erik Schanze wrote: Russell Kliese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I would like to maintain the aeromail package that is currently orphaned. I am not a debian maintainer and therefore am looking for a sponsor. I also had a look over aeromail a while ago. (See bug #229960) Please let me tell my opin

Re: Help: Specifying Command Line Args

Ben Hill [u] wrote on 20/10/2004 00:16: I'm building a package, but the makefile needs a commandline argument to build a particular type of binary. How should I run dh_make etc to do this? ? dh_make only builds a base set of files in debian/ Following that, customization is certainly needed. T

Re: Help: Specifying Command Line Args

also sprach Ben Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.20.0016 +0200]: > I'm building a package, but the makefile needs a commandline argument to > build a particular type of binary. How should I run dh_make etc to do > this? dh_make has nothing to do with Makefiles. I puts a template debian/rules file

Re: shlibs

On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 17:45 +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > I am not sure what you guys are talking about (unless I am completely > confused). shlibs files are for library packages that _provide_ > something to link against (SONAMEd shared libraries). shlibs:Depends > gets a list that is created by dp

Help: Specifying Command Line Args

Hi, I'm building a package, but the makefile needs a commandline argument to build a particular type of binary. How should I run dh_make etc to do this? Cheers, Ben -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.seigan.org GPG Fingerprint: 4309 1C58 5143 AFAC F69E 11CD 76FD 56D4 1223 E387

Re: Help: Specifying Command Line Args

Ben Hill [u] wrote on 20/10/2004 00:16: I'm building a package, but the makefile needs a commandline argument to build a particular type of binary. How should I run dh_make etc to do this? ? dh_make only builds a base set of files in debian/ Following that, customization is certainly needed. The bu

Re: Help: Specifying Command Line Args

also sprach Ben Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.20.0016 +0200]: > I'm building a package, but the makefile needs a commandline argument to > build a particular type of binary. How should I run dh_make etc to do > this? dh_make has nothing to do with Makefiles. I puts a template debian/rules file

Re: shlibs

On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 17:45 +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > I am not sure what you guys are talking about (unless I am completely > confused). shlibs files are for library packages that _provide_ > something to link against (SONAMEd shared libraries). shlibs:Depends > gets a list that is created by dp

Help: Specifying Command Line Args

Hi, I'm building a package, but the makefile needs a commandline argument to build a particular type of binary. How should I run dh_make etc to do this? Cheers, Ben -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.seigan.org GPG Fingerprint: 4309 1C58 5143 AFAC F69E 11CD 76FD 56D4 1223 E387 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: Looking for a sponser for aeromail package

Russell Kliese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I would like to maintain the aeromail package that is currently > orphaned. I am not a debian maintainer and therefore am looking for a > sponser. > I also had a look over aeromail a while ago. (See bug #229960) Please let me tell my opinion: Do you really

Re: shlibs

#include * David Moreno Garza [Tue, Oct 19 2004, 09:33:52AM]: > > Do you want your dependency to be satisfyable by either xmms (which > > shlibs suggests), or beep-media-player (which shlibs does not > > suggest). If so, you are either going to have to provide your own > > shlibs.local file and p

Re: shlibs

Adeodato Simó [u] wrote on 19/10/2004 17:25: what I was trying to point out on irc was: if ${shlibs:Depends} expands to xmms, that's because a binary in the package links against /usr/lib/libxmms.so.1. if you workaround that, you'll end up with a broken (*) binary in the system. (*)

Re: shlibs

* martin f krafft [Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:11:34 +0200]: > Do you want your dependency to be satisfyable by either xmms (which > shlibs suggests), or beep-media-player (which shlibs does not > suggest). If so, you are either going to have to provide your own > shlibs.local file and put in an appropria

Re: gpsd package (looking for a review)

also sprach Tilman Koschnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.19.1637 +0200]: > I have some experience with shared libs, and some experience with > deb packaging, just not with official packages yet, so they never > had to withstand the scrutiny of debian developers... I would suggest finding a good s

Re: Looking for a sponser for aeromail package

Russell Kliese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I would like to maintain the aeromail package that is currently > orphaned. I am not a debian maintainer and therefore am looking for a > sponser. > I also had a look over aeromail a while ago. (See bug #229960) Please let me tell my opinion: Do you really

Re: shlibs

On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 16:11 +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.19.1555 +0200]: > > debian/control hardcore: xmms | beep-media-player > > What's hardcore? I meant hardcore for using direct package names, instead what ${shlibs:Depends} yields

Re: gpsd package (looking for a review)

On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 15:52 +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Tilman Koschnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.19.1546 +0200]: > > I'm not looking for a sponsor (someone already offered to upload > > it as soon it is in good shape), but for opinions. Generally > > regarding quality, and a co

Re: shlibs

also sprach David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.19.1555 +0200]: > debian/control hardcore: xmms | beep-media-player What's hardcore? > The shlibs:Depends returns, among others, xmms. But I need to be > compared with another package, as in the first example. In the > case, beep media p

Re: shlibs

#include * David Moreno Garza [Tue, Oct 19 2004, 09:33:52AM]: > > Do you want your dependency to be satisfyable by either xmms (which > > shlibs suggests), or beep-media-player (which shlibs does not > > suggest). If so, you are either going to have to provide your own > > shlibs.local file and p

shlibs

Hello, I've been having a little problem in debian/control, on a package. What happen if I have ${shlibs:Depends}, which will be replaced by the packages needed by the configure script, but I need one of those packages to be tested against other? Let me explain. debian/control hardcore: xmms |

Re: shlibs

Adeodato Simó [u] wrote on 19/10/2004 17:25: what I was trying to point out on irc was: if ${shlibs:Depends} expands to xmms, that's because a binary in the package links against /usr/lib/libxmms.so.1. if you workaround that, you'll end up with a broken (*) binary in the system. (*) the

Re: gpsd package (looking for a review)

also sprach Tilman Koschnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.19.1546 +0200]: > I'm not looking for a sponsor (someone already offered to upload > it as soon it is in good shape), but for opinions. Generally > regarding quality, and a couple of specific questions. IMHO, nobody should upload a package

gpsd package (looking for a review)

Hi, I've prepared a package for gpsd, a GPS (Global Positioning System) daemon. See [0] for the ITP. I'm not looking for a sponsor (someone already offered to upload it as soon it is in good shape), but for opinions. Generally regarding quality, and a couple of specific questions. - The package

Re: shlibs

* martin f krafft [Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:11:34 +0200]: > Do you want your dependency to be satisfyable by either xmms (which > shlibs suggests), or beep-media-player (which shlibs does not > suggest). If so, you are either going to have to provide your own > shlibs.local file and put in an appropria

Re: Looking for a sponser for aeromail package

On Tuesday 19 October 2004 13.47, Russell Kliese wrote: > I would like to maintain the aeromail package that is currently > orphaned. I am not a debian maintainer and therefore am looking for a > sponser. You should start by reading the documentation, if you didn't already:

Re: debmake or dh-make, what should I use?

On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 11:19:48AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > #include > * martin f krafft [Sun, Oct 17 2004, 10:35:21PM]: > > Apart, yes, why not delete dh_* calls? > > Because you need to remember them again when you need them or look > around. Okay, it makes no difference when the day ends.

Re: gpsd package (looking for a review)

also sprach Tilman Koschnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.19.1637 +0200]: > I have some experience with shared libs, and some experience with > deb packaging, just not with official packages yet, so they never > had to withstand the scrutiny of debian developers... I would suggest finding a good s

Re: shlibs

On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 16:11 +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.19.1555 +0200]: > > debian/control hardcore: xmms | beep-media-player > > What's hardcore? I meant hardcore for using direct package names, instead what ${shlibs:Depends} yields

Re: gpsd package (looking for a review)

On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 15:52 +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Tilman Koschnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.19.1546 +0200]: > > I'm not looking for a sponsor (someone already offered to upload > > it as soon it is in good shape), but for opinions. Generally > > regarding quality, and a co

Re: shlibs

also sprach David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.19.1555 +0200]: > debian/control hardcore: xmms | beep-media-player What's hardcore? > The shlibs:Depends returns, among others, xmms. But I need to be > compared with another package, as in the first example. In the > case, beep media p

shlibs

Hello, I've been having a little problem in debian/control, on a package. What happen if I have ${shlibs:Depends}, which will be replaced by the packages needed by the configure script, but I need one of those packages to be tested against other? Let me explain. debian/control hardcore: xmms |

Re: gpsd package (looking for a review)

also sprach Tilman Koschnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.19.1546 +0200]: > I'm not looking for a sponsor (someone already offered to upload > it as soon it is in good shape), but for opinions. Generally > regarding quality, and a couple of specific questions. IMHO, nobody should upload a package

Looking for a sponser for aeromail package

I would like to maintain the aeromail package that is currently orphaned. I am not a debian maintainer and therefore am looking for a sponser. Regards, Russell

gpsd package (looking for a review)

Hi, I've prepared a package for gpsd, a GPS (Global Positioning System) daemon. See [0] for the ITP. I'm not looking for a sponsor (someone already offered to upload it as soon it is in good shape), but for opinions. Generally regarding quality, and a couple of specific questions. - The package

Re: Looking for a sponser for aeromail package

On Tuesday 19 October 2004 13.47, Russell Kliese wrote: > I would like to maintain the aeromail package that is currently > orphaned. I am not a debian maintainer and therefore am looking for a > sponser. You should start by reading the documentation, if you didn't already:

Re: debmake or dh-make, what should I use?

On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 11:19:48AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > #include > * martin f krafft [Sun, Oct 17 2004, 10:35:21PM]: > > Apart, yes, why not delete dh_* calls? > > Because you need to remember them again when you need them or look > around. Okay, it makes no difference when the day ends.

Looking for a sponser for aeromail package

I would like to maintain the aeromail package that is currently orphaned. I am not a debian maintainer and therefore am looking for a sponser. Regards, Russell -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]