folks,
I know that debconf-devel(7) lists the debconf protocol and that the
shell and Perl wrappers are basically 1:1. Still, I wonder if there
is any documentation about these (which may be a little more
accessible to new users). Could someone please take a clue stick and
whack it over my head if
You can submit the bug to Debian, and it becomes the maintainer's
responsibility to forward it upstream if so necessary. (There is a
mechanism, too, for tagging a bug as "forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]") such that
this isn't duplicated.
Or, you can submit it to Abiword.
TP,
Justin
On Wed, Oct 1
I found a bug in Abiword under unstable that is not listed under
http://bugs.debian.org This bug is most likely an Abiword issue and
not a Debian package issue. Should I submit the bug directly to
Abiword or is it better to submit a bug report to Debian and Abiword?
Is there a process to share t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have prepared a revised version of zed [1] -- a package that was
orphaned [2] some time ago. This new version goes by the number
1.0.5-10 and conforms to Standars-Version 3.6.1. It's also
lintian/linda clean.
The package is available at mentors.debi
You can submit the bug to Debian, and it becomes the maintainer's
responsibility to forward it upstream if so necessary. (There is a
mechanism, too, for tagging a bug as "forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]") such that
this isn't duplicated.
Or, you can submit it to Abiword.
TP,
Justin
On Wed, Oct 1
I found a bug in Abiword under unstable that is not listed under
http://bugs.debian.org This bug is most likely an Abiword issue and
not a Debian package issue. Should I submit the bug directly to
Abiword or is it better to submit a bug report to Debian and Abiword?
Is there a process to share t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have prepared a revised version of zed [1] -- a package that was
orphaned [2] some time ago. This new version goes by the number
1.0.5-10 and conforms to Standars-Version 3.6.1. It's also
lintian/linda clean.
The package is available at mentors.debi
also sprach Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.13.1202 +0200]:
> . The first point is the 100% debconf use for configuration.
I am not sure I find this a good thing.
> Tell me if I'm wrong.
I am sure you are not. I personally do not see the benefit of the
software, but then again, I am
Hi,
I think the package maintainer of Gaim is too busy for it. Is there anyone
give me a hand with this?
Any help would be appreciated.
Files: http://www.ivanwong.info/gaim-hotkeys/
Cheers,
Ivan.
GPG: 1024D/4A9A664A 2004-10-04
- Original Message -
From: "Ivan Wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
> I am not opposed to your package, but have you looked at the other
> ones I quoted? Some of them are equally simple and provide the same
> or even greater functionality.
flexbackup :
- no debconf use for configuration (really not userfriendl
also sprach Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.13.1011 +0200]:
> That's a userfriendly one. Just install the package, answer
> questions and that's it.
I am not opposed to your package, but have you looked at the other
ones I quoted? Some of them are equally simple and provide the same
or
also sprach Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.13.1202 +0200]:
> . The first point is the 100% debconf use for configuration.
I am not sure I find this a good thing.
> Tell me if I'm wrong.
I am sure you are not. I personally do not see the benefit of the
software, but then again, I am
Hi,
I think the package maintainer of Gaim is too busy for it. Is there anyone
give me a hand with this?
Any help would be appreciated.
Files: http://www.ivanwong.info/gaim-hotkeys/
Cheers,
Ivan.
GPG: 1024D/4A9A664A 2004-10-04
- Original Message -
From: "Ivan Wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
> also sprach Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.13.1001 +0200]:
> > I've packaged a small-but-useful piece of software called
> > backup-manager.
That's a userfriendly one. Just install the package, answer questions
and that's it.
You'll be
also sprach Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.13.1001 +0200]:
> I've packaged a small-but-useful piece of software called
> backup-manager.
How does this differ from backup2l or faubackup, flexbackup, or even
just plain tar+savelog+cron?
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I
* martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
> I am not opposed to your package, but have you looked at the other
> ones I quoted? Some of them are equally simple and provide the same
> or even greater functionality.
flexbackup :
- no debconf use for configuration (really not userfriendl
Hello there.
I've packaged a small-but-useful piece of software called
backup-manager.
I've made an ITP :
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/10/msg00424.html
I've set up a personal repository to test the package :
deb http://www.sukria.net/debian ./
deb-src http://www.sukria.net/debian .
also sprach Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.13.1011 +0200]:
> That's a userfriendly one. Just install the package, answer
> questions and that's it.
I am not opposed to your package, but have you looked at the other
ones I quoted? Some of them are equally simple and provide the same
or
On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 01:55, Alec Berryman wrote:
> begin quotation of Matt Brubeck on 2004-10-12 17:42:12 -0700:
>
> > You should make sure to file a WNPP bug.
>
> Apparently an ITP has already been filed [1] by Rob Bradford.
I checked that Tomboy wasn't being worked on currently, and filed an
davfs2 is a user-space tool to mount a DAV "repository" into the
local FS tree. It uses the Coda kernel driver to do so, and it thus
needs coda.h. I am sponsoring the package.
I think this is actually legitimate use of linux-kernel-headers, but
I am not entirely sure. Could you please confirm that
* martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
> also sprach Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.13.1001 +0200]:
> > I've packaged a small-but-useful piece of software called
> > backup-manager.
That's a userfriendly one. Just install the package, answer questions
and that's it.
You'll be
also sprach Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.13.1001 +0200]:
> I've packaged a small-but-useful piece of software called
> backup-manager.
How does this differ from backup2l or faubackup, flexbackup, or even
just plain tar+savelog+cron?
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I
Hello there.
I've packaged a small-but-useful piece of software called
backup-manager.
I've made an ITP :
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/10/msg00424.html
I've set up a personal repository to test the package :
deb http://www.sukria.net/debian ./
deb-src http://www.sukria.net/debian .
On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 01:55, Alec Berryman wrote:
> begin quotation of Matt Brubeck on 2004-10-12 17:42:12 -0700:
>
> > You should make sure to file a WNPP bug.
>
> Apparently an ITP has already been filed [1] by Rob Bradford.
I checked that Tomboy wasn't being worked on currently, and filed an
24 matches
Mail list logo
