Re: Looking for a sponsor

2004-10-02 Thread Oded Shimon
On Sunday 03 October 2004 04:23, Estêvão Valadão wrote: > Hi, my name is Estךvדo, i'm a Linux systems > administrator and i really want to join the Debian > Team. > I wanna develop the ipautofw package, and i'm > looking for a sponsor to begin the process. > Thanks for the atention. > > Bes

Looking for a sponsor

2004-10-02 Thread Estêvão Valadão
Hi, my name is Estêvão, i'm a Linux systems administrator and i really want to join the Debian Team. I wanna develop the ipautofw package, and i'm looking for a sponsor to begin the process. Thanks for the atention. Best Regards, Estêvão Valadão = Estêvão Valad

Re: RFS: spampd - a SpamAssassin based SMTP/LMTP scanning proxy daemon

2004-10-02 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, martin f krafft said: > also sprach Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.02.2156 +0200]: > > Does postfix not have something like exim's routers?(I really am > > asking - I don't know postfix well). I was under the impression > > that one of the strengths of it's

Re: Looking for a sponsor

2004-10-02 Thread Oded Shimon
On Sunday 03 October 2004 04:23, EstÃvÃo ValadÃo wrote: > Hi, my name is Est×v×o, i'm a Linux systems > administrator and i really want to join the Debian > Team. > I wanna develop the ipautofw package, and i'm > looking for a sponsor to begin the process. > Thanks for the atention. > > Bes

Looking for a sponsor

2004-10-02 Thread Estêvão Valadão
Hi, my name is Estêvão, i'm a Linux systems administrator and i really want to join the Debian Team. I wanna develop the ipautofw package, and i'm looking for a sponsor to begin the process. Thanks for the atention. Best Regards, Estêvão Valadão = Estêvão Valad

Re: RFS: spampd - a SpamAssassin based SMTP/LMTP scanning proxy daemon

2004-10-02 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, martin f krafft said: > also sprach Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.02.2156 +0200]: > > Does postfix not have something like exim's routers?(I really am > > asking - I don't know postfix well). I was under the impression > > that one of the strengths of it's

Re: RFS: spampd - a SpamAssassin based SMTP/LMTP scanning proxy daemon

2004-10-02 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sat, 02 Oct 2004, Stephen Gran wrote: > Does postfix not have something like exim's routers?(I really am asking > - I don't know postfix well). I was under the impression that one of > the strengths of it's modularity was that you could plug extra pieces in > in the middle of a routing chain fo

Re: RFS: spampd - a SpamAssassin based SMTP/LMTP scanning proxy daemon

2004-10-02 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.02.2156 +0200]: > Does postfix not have something like exim's routers?(I really am > asking - I don't know postfix well). I was under the impression > that one of the strengths of it's modularity was that you could > plug extra pieces in in the

Re: RFS: spampd - a SpamAssassin based SMTP/LMTP scanning proxy daemon

2004-10-02 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, martin f krafft said: > also sprach Greg Norris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.02.2046 +0200]: > > I originally tried configuring postfix to do per-user filtering > > via spamc/spamd directly (using the "-u" spamc option), but that > > setup has a number of issues which m

Re: RFS: spampd - a SpamAssassin based SMTP/LMTP scanning proxy daemon

2004-10-02 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Greg Norris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.02.2046 +0200]: > I originally tried configuring postfix to do per-user filtering > via spamc/spamd directly (using the "-u" spamc option), but that > setup has a number of issues which make it undesirable. use procmail as mda and then /etc/proc

Re: RFS: spampd - a SpamAssassin based SMTP/LMTP scanning proxy daemon

2004-10-02 Thread Greg Norris
On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 03:16:03PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > Are there any Spamassassin based SMTP proxies which can do per-user > > bayesian filtering? I've been looking for just such a beastie, but no > > luck so far... :-( > > amavisd-new. Actually, I set that up about 2

Re: [RFS]: pcopy - a replacement for dd

2004-10-02 Thread George Danchev
On Saturday 02 October 2004 21:25, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Sat, 02 Oct 2004, George Danchev wrote: > > Desc: Pcopy is intended to be used when doing large disk(partition) to > > disk(partition) copying where dd is just too slow (and error prone). > > When DD is slow, it just mean yo

Re: RFS: spampd - a SpamAssassin based SMTP/LMTP scanning proxy daemon

2004-10-02 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.02.2016 +0200]: > > Are there any Spamassassin based SMTP proxies which can do per-user > > bayesian filtering? I've been looking for just such a beastie, but no > > luck so far... :-( > > amavisd-new. How so? How does it kn

Re: [RFS]: pcopy - a replacement for dd

2004-10-02 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sat, 02 Oct 2004, George Danchev wrote: > Desc: Pcopy is intended to be used when doing large disk(partition) to > disk(partition) copying where dd is just too slow (and error prone). When DD is slow, it just mean you should be using raw devices (see the raw command)... :) -- "One disk to

[RFS]: pcopy - a replacement for dd

2004-10-02 Thread George Danchev
Hello, Package: pcopy License: GPL URL: http://www.lysator.liu.se/~pen/pcopy/ Desc: Pcopy is intended to be used when doing large disk(partition) to disk(partition) copying where dd is just too slow (and error prone). Preliminary packages: ftp://ftp.logos-bg.net/debian/ (.diff.gz, .dsc, build, .c

Re: RFS: spampd - a SpamAssassin based SMTP/LMTP scanning proxy daemon

2004-10-02 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sat, 02 Oct 2004, Greg Norris wrote: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 07:41:57PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > > And its major disadvantage is that it cannot be configured per-user. > > This makes bayesian filtering kinda useless. > > Are there any Spamassassin based SMTP proxies which can do per-us

Re: RFS: spampd - a SpamAssassin based SMTP/LMTP scanning proxy daemon

2004-10-02 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sat, 02 Oct 2004, Stephen Gran wrote: > Does postfix not have something like exim's routers?(I really am asking > - I don't know postfix well). I was under the impression that one of > the strengths of it's modularity was that you could plug extra pieces in > in the middle of a routing chain fo

Re: RFS: spampd - a SpamAssassin based SMTP/LMTP scanning proxy daemon

2004-10-02 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.02.2156 +0200]: > Does postfix not have something like exim's routers?(I really am > asking - I don't know postfix well). I was under the impression > that one of the strengths of it's modularity was that you could > plug extra pieces in in the

Re: RFS: spampd - a SpamAssassin based SMTP/LMTP scanning proxy daemon

2004-10-02 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, martin f krafft said: > also sprach Greg Norris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.02.2046 +0200]: > > I originally tried configuring postfix to do per-user filtering > > via spamc/spamd directly (using the "-u" spamc option), but that > > setup has a number of issues which m

Re: RFS: spampd - a SpamAssassin based SMTP/LMTP scanning proxy daemon

2004-10-02 Thread Greg Norris
On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 07:41:57PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > And its major disadvantage is that it cannot be configured per-user. > This makes bayesian filtering kinda useless. Are there any Spamassassin based SMTP proxies which can do per-user bayesian filtering? I've been looking for jus

Re: RFS: spampd - a SpamAssassin based SMTP/LMTP scanning proxy daemon

2004-10-02 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Greg Norris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.02.2046 +0200]: > I originally tried configuring postfix to do per-user filtering > via spamc/spamd directly (using the "-u" spamc option), but that > setup has a number of issues which make it undesirable. use procmail as mda and then /etc/proc

Re: RFS: spampd - a SpamAssassin based SMTP/LMTP scanning proxy daemon

2004-10-02 Thread Greg Norris
On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 03:16:03PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > Are there any Spamassassin based SMTP proxies which can do per-user > > bayesian filtering? I've been looking for just such a beastie, but no > > luck so far... :-( > > amavisd-new. Actually, I set that up about 2

Re: [RFS]: pcopy - a replacement for dd

2004-10-02 Thread George Danchev
On Saturday 02 October 2004 21:25, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Sat, 02 Oct 2004, George Danchev wrote: > > Desc: Pcopy is intended to be used when doing large disk(partition) to > > disk(partition) copying where dd is just too slow (and error prone). > > When DD is slow, it just mean yo

Re: RFS: spampd - a SpamAssassin based SMTP/LMTP scanning proxy daemon

2004-10-02 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.02.2016 +0200]: > > Are there any Spamassassin based SMTP proxies which can do per-user > > bayesian filtering? I've been looking for just such a beastie, but no > > luck so far... :-( > > amavisd-new. How so? How does it kno

Re: [RFS]: pcopy - a replacement for dd

2004-10-02 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sat, 02 Oct 2004, George Danchev wrote: > Desc: Pcopy is intended to be used when doing large disk(partition) to > disk(partition) copying where dd is just too slow (and error prone). When DD is slow, it just mean you should be using raw devices (see the raw command)... :) -- "One disk to

[RFS]: pcopy - a replacement for dd

2004-10-02 Thread George Danchev
Hello, Package: pcopy License: GPL URL: http://www.lysator.liu.se/~pen/pcopy/ Desc: Pcopy is intended to be used when doing large disk(partition) to disk(partition) copying where dd is just too slow (and error prone). Preliminary packages: ftp://ftp.logos-bg.net/debian/ (.diff.gz, .dsc, build, .c

Re: RFS: spampd - a SpamAssassin based SMTP/LMTP scanning proxy daemon

2004-10-02 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sat, 02 Oct 2004, Greg Norris wrote: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 07:41:57PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > > And its major disadvantage is that it cannot be configured per-user. > > This makes bayesian filtering kinda useless. > > Are there any Spamassassin based SMTP proxies which can do per-us

Re: RFS: spampd - a SpamAssassin based SMTP/LMTP scanning proxy daemon

2004-10-02 Thread Greg Norris
On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 07:41:57PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > And its major disadvantage is that it cannot be configured per-user. > This makes bayesian filtering kinda useless. Are there any Spamassassin based SMTP proxies which can do per-user bayesian filtering? I've been looking for jus

Re: RFS: libfilesys-diskfree-perl

2004-10-02 Thread Florian Ernst
Hello again! On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 12:42:44AM +0200, Mohammed Sameer wrote: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 12:59:27PM +0200, Florian Ernst wrote: > > Next to all the stuff a lintian run will tell you (CVS entries, > > version number, Standards-Version, ...) please note: > > > well, I didn't get any

Re: RFS: libfilesys-diskfree-perl

2004-10-02 Thread Florian Ernst
Hello again! On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 12:42:44AM +0200, Mohammed Sameer wrote: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 12:59:27PM +0200, Florian Ernst wrote: > > Next to all the stuff a lintian run will tell you (CVS entries, > > version number, Standards-Version, ...) please note: > > > well, I didn't get any

Re: RFS: mkat - transparent CLI frontend to burn, catalog data and audio CDs

2004-10-02 Thread Nathaniel W. Turner
On Tuesday 28 September 2004 11:50 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > As of "write" vs "burn" I prefer burn, it seems to be term most people > use. "Write" is too generic. I mentioned "write" because I noticed that is the word the cdrecord maintainer uses in the short description for that package. C