Wesley J Landaker wrote:
On Tuesday 17 August 2004 21:27, Lawrence Williams wrote:
That would be great. For now, I'd just like some help with the two
dependencies i need for my lsongs package. Both are only small
packages and should be fairly easy to clean up. They are mostly clean
now as I'
Wesley J Landaker wrote:
On Tuesday 17 August 2004 21:27, Lawrence Williams wrote:
That would be great. For now, I'd just like some help with the two
dependencies i need for my lsongs package. Both are only small
packages and should be fairly easy to clean up. They are mostly clean
now as I've i
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 12:33:44 -0600
Amr Nasr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Makefile:18: *** missing separator (did you mean TAB instead of 8
> spaces?). Stop.
objective: dependencies
rules
These separators *must* be one tab keypress, not spaces. All of them.
Maybe your editor has
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 12:33:44PM -0600, Amr Nasr wrote:
>hi all ,
>I have read the debian Maintainers' Guide for Creating debian Packages
>and i was following it for creation of the package and then when i run
>*dh_make* according to the instructions i get errors related to the
>Makefile that i
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:04:06 +0200, "Eduard Bloch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> #include
> * Gertjan van Zwieten [Thu, Aug 19 2004, 12:01:12PM]:
>
> > I admit I was not aware of this perl one-liner you're
> > referring to. I
>
> Such as... for x in *.deb; do perl -e 'read(STDIN,$a,2000);
> $a=~s,^(
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 12:23:00 +0200, "Michael Koch"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Am Donnerstag, 19. August 2004 12:01 schrieb Gertjan van Zwieten:
> > Hi Eduard,
> >
> > I admit I was not aware of this perl one-liner you're referring to.
> > I didn't find any of this on the website, which by the way
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 12:33:44 -0600
Amr Nasr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Makefile:18: *** missing separator (did you mean TAB instead of 8
> spaces?). Stop.
objective: dependencies
rules
These separators *must* be one tab keypress, not spaces. All of them.
Maybe your editor has
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 12:33:44PM -0600, Amr Nasr wrote:
>hi all ,
>I have read the debian Maintainers' Guide for Creating debian Packages
>and i was following it for creation of the package and then when i run
>*dh_make* according to the instructions i get errors related to the
>Makefile that i
Hi, All.
In my Linux program on my computer with Debian Linux I need to have a
simple command line input. I plan to use remote Windows computer as remote
console and use it's Windows telnet for communication. I try to use Linux
readline library. It works when I use standard input and output. When
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 12:23:00 +0200, "Michael Koch"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Am Donnerstag, 19. August 2004 12:01 schrieb Gertjan van Zwieten:
> > Hi Eduard,
> >
> > I admit I was not aware of this perl one-liner you're referring to.
> > I didn't find any of this on the website, which by the way
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:04:06 +0200, "Eduard Bloch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> #include
> * Gertjan van Zwieten [Thu, Aug 19 2004, 12:01:12PM]:
>
> > I admit I was not aware of this perl one-liner you're
> > referring to. I
>
> Such as... for x in *.deb; do perl -e 'read(STDIN,$a,2000);
> $a=~s,^(
hi all ,
I have read the debian Maintainers' Guide for Creating debian Packages
and i was following it for creation of the package and then when i run
dh_make according to the instructions i get errors related to
the Makefile that i have
modified as i am trying to install a script and get
Hi, All.
In my Linux program on my computer with Debian Linux I need to have a
simple command line input. I plan to use remote Windows computer as remote
console and use it's Windows telnet for communication. I try to use Linux
readline library. It works when I use standard input and output. When
hi all ,
I have read the debian Maintainers' Guide for Creating debian Packages
and i was following it for creation of the package and then when i run
dh_make according to the instructions i get errors related to
the Makefile that i have
modified as i am trying to install a script and get
#include
* Gertjan van Zwieten [Thu, Aug 19 2004, 12:01:12PM]:
> I admit I was not aware of this perl one-liner you're referring to. I
Such as... for x in *.deb; do perl -e 'read(STDIN,$a,2000);
$a=~s,^(.*?)\r?\n\r?\n,,ms; print $a, ' < $x > pure/$x; done
> didn't find any of this on the websi
#include
* Gertjan van Zwieten [Thu, Aug 19 2004, 12:01:12PM]:
> I admit I was not aware of this perl one-liner you're referring to. I
Such as... for x in *.deb; do perl -e 'read(STDIN,$a,2000);
$a=~s,^(.*?)\r?\n\r?\n,,ms; print $a, ' < $x > pure/$x; done
> didn't find any of this on the websi
Am Donnerstag, 19. August 2004 12:01 schrieb Gertjan van Zwieten:
> Hi Eduard,
>
> I admit I was not aware of this perl one-liner you're referring to.
> I didn't find any of this on the website, which by the way seems to
> be currently offline. Still, even with such script some problems
> remain. F
Hi Eduard,
I admit I was not aware of this perl one-liner you're referring to. I
didn't find any of this on the website, which by the way seems to be
currently offline. Still, even with such script some problems remain.
For instance apt-cacher's cache can't be easily turned into an offline
cache,
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Do we really want to be adding to the number of svgalib-based programs
> in the archive? Surely this isn't the only security problem lurking...
There's already a PS/PDF viewer for non-X11 in the archive: fbgs from
the fbi package. (Unfortunately the package description doe
#include
* Gertjan van Zwieten [Tue, Aug 17 2004, 10:40:50PM]:
> The existing solutions like apt-cacher and apt-proxy didn't really offer
> what I was looking for. I have tried to explain this on the website:
> http://gertjan.freezope.org/replicator.
I do not trust your analysis of apt-cacher. I
Am Donnerstag, 19. August 2004 12:01 schrieb Gertjan van Zwieten:
> Hi Eduard,
>
> I admit I was not aware of this perl one-liner you're referring to.
> I didn't find any of this on the website, which by the way seems to
> be currently offline. Still, even with such script some problems
> remain. F
gbbus. jequnxmc afeyn Ubkurlbue gfdijmayd
Do you know that the con g r ess. just
passed a new law and you can
xzyresjn, ypvfyd obbrnirq omexd
r e f
inance your - mo.
r t gage with Z ER O. ra
t e?
Viwmbjel kztto, montq Zokjxcl oieooxcxh
More then 300,000 families used
this offer last month.
Hi Eduard,
I admit I was not aware of this perl one-liner you're referring to. I
didn't find any of this on the website, which by the way seems to be
currently offline. Still, even with such script some problems remain.
For instance apt-cacher's cache can't be easily turned into an offline
cache,
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Do we really want to be adding to the number of svgalib-based programs
> in the archive? Surely this isn't the only security problem lurking...
There's already a PS/PDF viewer for non-X11 in the archive: fbgs from
the fbi package. (Unfortunately the package description doe
#include
* Gertjan van Zwieten [Tue, Aug 17 2004, 10:40:50PM]:
> The existing solutions like apt-cacher and apt-proxy didn't really offer
> what I was looking for. I have tried to explain this on the website:
> http://gertjan.freezope.org/replicator.
I do not trust your analysis of apt-cacher. I
gbbus. jequnxmc afeyn Ubkurlbue gfdijmayd
Do you know that the con g r ess. just
passed a new law and you can
xzyresjn, ypvfyd obbrnirq omexd
r e f
inance your - mo.
r t gage with Z ER O. ra
t e?
Viwmbjel kztto, montq Zokjxcl oieooxcxh
More then 300,000 families used
this offer last month.
26 matches
Mail list logo
