On Wednesday 18 August 2004 15:56, Rolandas Juodzbalis wrote:
> I already found big (?) bug with Debian all versions probably, but
[ . . . ]
> helping me to correct mistakes. But what is interesting in all this -
> nobody answered with "yes, I will sponsor you". Of course, it is only
> four days
On Tuesday 17 August 2004 21:27, Lawrence Williams wrote:
> That would be great. For now, I'd just like some help with the two
> dependencies i need for my lsongs package. Both are only small
> packages and should be fairly easy to clean up. They are mostly clean
> now as I've inherited the work of
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 01:45:07 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Do we really want to be adding to the number of svgalib-based programs in
> the archive? Surely this isn't the only security problem lurking...
It's a very simple bug to fix, and documented right in the vga_init
manpage. Here's the fix:
Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Well, choice is about having multiple packages offering distinct
benefits. Choice is not about having two dozen half- to un-maintained
packages failing to achieve the same goal. Being offered 20 packages
isn't exactly a service to the user if he cannot be certain how long
On Wednesday 18 August 2004 15:56, Rolandas Juodzbalis wrote:
> I already found big (?) bug with Debian all versions probably, but
[ . . . ]
> helping me to correct mistakes. But what is interesting in all this -
> nobody answered with "yes, I will sponsor you". Of course, it is only
> four days
On Tuesday 17 August 2004 21:27, Lawrence Williams wrote:
> That would be great. For now, I'd just like some help with the two
> dependencies i need for my lsongs package. Both are only small
> packages and should be fairly easy to clean up. They are mostly clean
> now as I've inherited the work of
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 01:45:07 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Do we really want to be adding to the number of svgalib-based programs in
> the archive? Surely this isn't the only security problem lurking...
It's a very simple bug to fix, and documented right in the vga_init
manpage. Here's the fix:
I have put a (hidden) version 2.2 online with the first four suggested
changes:
* http://gertjan.freezope.org/replicator/http-replicator_2.2.dsc
* http://gertjan.freezope.org/replicator/http-replicator_2.2.tar.gz
* http://gertjan.freezope.org/replicator/http-replicator_2.2_i386.deb
I don't see wh
=_NextPart_000_%RND_NUM_1.x
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Wh=E8re some br=E8ast enh=E3ncement pills promiuse miracles
we don=92t we just help your bre=E3sts achieve their
full n=E3tural s=ECze. Caress is a unique h=E8rbal bre=E0st
enh=E3ncement fo
Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Well, choice is about having multiple packages offering distinct
benefits. Choice is not about having two dozen half- to un-maintained
packages failing to achieve the same goal. Being offered 20 packages
isn't exactly a service to the user if he cannot be certain how long and
I have put a (hidden) version 2.2 online with the first four suggested
changes:
* http://gertjan.freezope.org/replicator/http-replicator_2.2.dsc
* http://gertjan.freezope.org/replicator/http-replicator_2.2.tar.gz
* http://gertjan.freezope.org/replicator/http-replicator_2.2_i386.deb
I don't see wh
=_NextPart_000_%RND_NUM_1.x
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Wh=E8re some br=E8ast enh=E3ncement pills promiuse miracles
we don=92t we just help your bre=E3sts achieve their
full n=E3tural s=ECze. Caress is a unique h=E8rbal bre=E0st
enh=E3ncement fo
Dear Mentors,
This is my second plea for a sponsor for a debian package, kimdaba.
I bet all of you have hundreds or even thousands of images on your hard drive,
collected since you got your first digital camera. And I'm sure that
through all these years you believed that until eternity you woul
Dear Mentors,
This is my second plea for a sponsor for a debian package, kimdaba.
I bet all of you have hundreds or even thousands of images on your hard drive,
collected since you got your first digital camera. And I'm sure that
through all these years you believed that until eternity you woul
Luk Claes wrote:
> xpat2 is installed for m68k a couple of days ago, though it isn't
> entering testing because it has "not yet built on m68k"??
>
> It has been built 2 times according buildd.d.o, it is installed
> according to buildd.net, but waiting for a build according to
> bjorn.haxx.se/debia
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 04:23:51PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> xpat2 is installed for m68k a couple of days ago, though it isn't entering
> testing because it has "not yet built on m68k"??
>
> It has been built 2 times according buildd.d.o, it is installed according
> to buildd.net, but waiting for
ITP: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=263830
I am not a Debian Developer, so I am looking for sponsorship.
My packages for the following are available at:
http://users.adelphia.net/~david.everly/emilda/sarge/
deb http://users.adelphia.net/~david.everly emilda/sarge/
deb-src
Hi
xpat2 is installed for m68k a couple of days ago, though it isn't entering
testing because it has "not yet built on m68k"??
It has been built 2 times according buildd.d.o, it is installed according
to buildd.net, but waiting for a build according to bjorn.haxx.se/debian.
What is going wrong o
Luk Claes wrote:
> xpat2 is installed for m68k a couple of days ago, though it isn't
> entering testing because it has "not yet built on m68k"??
>
> It has been built 2 times according buildd.d.o, it is installed
> according to buildd.net, but waiting for a build according to
> bjorn.haxx.se/debia
On Wednesday 18 August 2004 00:52, Jacob Luna Lundberg wrote:
> Ok, I'd like to make this 0.2.0-3 since -2 has been published on my
> archive for a while now. I've created -3 with hopefully the needed
> amendment, available at (http://www.gnifty.net/code/xscorch/).
Looks good, I've uploaded it.
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 04:23:51PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> xpat2 is installed for m68k a couple of days ago, though it isn't entering
> testing because it has "not yet built on m68k"??
>
> It has been built 2 times according buildd.d.o, it is installed according
> to buildd.net, but waiting for
ITP: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=263830
I am not a Debian Developer, so I am looking for sponsorship.
My packages for the following are available at:
http://users.adelphia.net/~david.everly/emilda/sarge/
deb http://users.adelphia.net/~david.everly emilda/sarge/
deb-src
I am building some cross-compilers using the crosstool scripts
(http://kegel.com/crosstool/) and I think that they are generally useful to
Debian.
I have a new version that is based on crosstool 0.28-rc32 and also has a SPARC
cross-compiler. I don't have access to any other architecture to test
Hi
xpat2 is installed for m68k a couple of days ago, though it isn't entering
testing because it has "not yet built on m68k"??
It has been built 2 times according buildd.d.o, it is installed according
to buildd.net, but waiting for a build according to bjorn.haxx.se/debian.
What is going wrong o
On Wednesday 18 August 2004 00:52, Jacob Luna Lundberg wrote:
> Ok, I'd like to make this 0.2.0-3 since -2 has been published on my
> archive for a while now. I've created -3 with hopefully the needed
> amendment, available at (http://www.gnifty.net/code/xscorch/).
Looks good, I've uploaded it.
I am building some cross-compilers using the crosstool scripts
(http://kegel.com/crosstool/) and I think that they are generally useful to
Debian.
I have a new version that is based on crosstool 0.28-rc32 and also has a SPARC
cross-compiler. I don't have access to any other architecture to test
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 09:14:27AM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 06:32:30PM -0700, Ken Bloom wrote:
> > The third was written by someone else, but it's very useful:
> >Package: svp
> >Version: 0.2-3
> >Description: An SVGAlib based viewer for PostScript and PDF fil
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 06:32:30PM -0700, Ken Bloom wrote:
>
> The third was written by someone else, but it's very useful:
>Package: svp
>Version: 0.2-3
>Description: An SVGAlib based viewer for PostScript and PDF files
> svp is an SVGAlib based GhostScript frontend, allowing you
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 08:34:57PM -0600, Wesley J Landaker wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 August 2004 17:32, Jacob Luna Lundberg wrote:
> > I maintain the xscorch package and my usual sponsor isn't responding
> > (I think he's just too busy). I have a new debian version which
> > fixes a bug with 64-bit
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 09:14:27AM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 06:32:30PM -0700, Ken Bloom wrote:
> > The third was written by someone else, but it's very useful:
> >Package: svp
> >Version: 0.2-3
> >Description: An SVGAlib based viewer for PostScript and PDF fil
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 06:32:30PM -0700, Ken Bloom wrote:
>
> The third was written by someone else, but it's very useful:
>Package: svp
>Version: 0.2-3
>Description: An SVGAlib based viewer for PostScript and PDF files
> svp is an SVGAlib based GhostScript frontend, allowing you
31 matches
Mail list logo
