* Faheem Mitha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-17 01:12:46 +]:
> > I've been trying to package subversion, version 1.1.0-rc2,
I think David already started with it, as we got a request for the
package. But please note two things: we short of postponed it, as it
won't make into Sarge and David is
Hello mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for following packages.
Package name: mozilla-firefox-locale-zh-tw
Version: 0.9
Licence: MPL
Package name: mozilla-thunderbird-locale-zh-tw
Version: 0.7
Licence: MPL
Description:
These packages are locale files for mozilla firefox/thunderbird of
region
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:24:42 -0400 (EDT), Faheem Mitha
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear People,
>
> I've been trying to package subversion, version 1.1.0-rc2, using the
> already packaged versions as a jumping-off point. However, I have run into
> some difficulties, and was hoping people on this
Hello mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for following packages.
Package name: mozilla-firefox-locale-zh-tw
Version: 0.9
Licence: MPL
Package name: mozilla-thunderbird-locale-zh-tw
Version: 0.7
Licence: MPL
Description:
These packages are locale files for mozilla firefox/thunderbird of
region
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:24:42 -0400 (EDT), Faheem Mitha
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear People,
>
> I've been trying to package subversion, version 1.1.0-rc2, using the
> already packaged versions as a jumping-off point. However, I have run into
> some difficulties, and was hoping people on this
El Martes, 17 de Agosto de 2004 00:34, Alejandro Exojo escribió:
> If you can not sponsor the package for any reason, I will welcome any other
> kind of feedback, of course. :-)
Silly me... I forgot to paste the URL O:-)))
You can add this to sources.list to fetch the package and the source:
deb
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Faheem Mitha wrote:
>
> Dear People,
>
> I've been trying to package subversion, version 1.1.0-rc2, using the
> already packaged versions as a jumping-off point. However, I have run
> into some difficulties, and was hoping people on this list would help me
> out.
Um, sorry.
Dear People,
I've been trying to package subversion, version 1.1.0-rc2, using the
already packaged versions as a jumping-off point. However, I have run into
some difficulties, and was hoping people on this list would help me out.
I should probably start by saying that I'm trying to use svn-build
Hi.
This is a request for an sponsor of the package kxmleditor, which is up for
adoption (bug #255299).
This version fixes a FTBFS release critical bug (#265680). The package is
lintian and linda clean, and compiles without problems in pbuilder's chroot.
The only warning I have, is because ups
El Martes, 17 de Agosto de 2004 00:34, Alejandro Exojo escribió:
> If you can not sponsor the package for any reason, I will welcome any other
> kind of feedback, of course. :-)
Silly me... I forgot to paste the URL O:-)))
You can add this to sources.list to fetch the package and the source:
deb
Hi all,
I've packaged jailkit, a collection of tools to create and maintain chroot
jails. The package is lintian clean. My pgp key is checked by some debian
developers already, so now I need a sponsor.
The package can be found here:
http://olivier.sessink.nl/jailkit/debian/
thanks,
Olivi
Dear People,
I've been trying to package subversion, version 1.1.0-rc2, using the
already packaged versions as a jumping-off point. However, I have run into
some difficulties, and was hoping people on this list would help me out.
I should probably start by saying that I'm trying to use svn-build
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Faheem Mitha wrote:
>
> Dear People,
>
> I've been trying to package subversion, version 1.1.0-rc2, using the
> already packaged versions as a jumping-off point. However, I have run
> into some difficulties, and was hoping people on this list would help me
> out.
Um, sorry.
Hi.
This is a request for an sponsor of the package kxmleditor, which is up for
adoption (bug #255299).
This version fixes a FTBFS release critical bug (#265680). The package is
lintian and linda clean, and compiles without problems in pbuilder's chroot.
The only warning I have, is because ups
[...]
> Usually I would not change a sponsored package before uploading, but I
> wanted to get it in before dinstall runs, shortly before sarge time is
> an issue. - I do hope that is ok for you.
I'm more than happy. Thanks for all your help :)
Cheers
John
Hi all,
I've packaged jailkit, a collection of tools to create and maintain chroot
jails. The package is lintian clean. My pgp key is checked by some debian
developers already, so now I need a sponsor.
The package can be found here:
http://olivier.sessink.nl/jailkit/debian/
thanks,
Olivi
[...]
> Usually I would not change a sponsored package before uploading, but I
> wanted to get it in before dinstall runs, shortly before sarge time is
> an issue. - I do hope that is ok for you.
I'm more than happy. Thanks for all your help :)
Cheers
John
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 05:58:26PM +0100, John Hedges wrote:
[...]
> I've put a new copy at the above address.
I made a last minute change to debian/control and uploaded the package.
-Description: Sound player for MPEG-1,2 layer 1,2,3 Based on maplay, this
- package decodes layer I, II, and III M
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 04:30:42PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 03:24:52PM +0100, John Hedges wrote:
> [...]
> > If you feel inclined to take a further look, 0.9.5.2-6 is now at
> > http://www.callpoint.org/splay/
>
> Almost ok. debian/control must not hardcode the shli
W liście z pon, 16-08-2004, godz. 08:42, James Damour pisze:
> I've created a new set of package file and made them available at
> http://www.damour.info/debian/. Could someone please submit them to the
> upload queue for me (as I'm not a Debian Developer)?
done.
GBP
--
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 05:58:26PM +0100, John Hedges wrote:
[...]
> I've put a new copy at the above address.
I made a last minute change to debian/control and uploaded the package.
-Description: Sound player for MPEG-1,2 layer 1,2,3 Based on maplay, this
- package decodes layer I, II, and III M
Hello Chris,
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 03:08:27PM +0100, Chris Jefferson wrote:
> I'm currently trying to package MAME, but thought that I would also look
> for a sponsor, as I wasn't sure if it might be difficult for a
> contraversal package.
Emulation in general is not *that* controversial -- I
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 04:30:42PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 03:24:52PM +0100, John Hedges wrote:
> [...]
> > If you feel inclined to take a further look, 0.9.5.2-6 is now at
> > http://www.callpoint.org/splay/
>
> Almost ok. debian/control must not hardcode the shli
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 03:24:52PM +0100, John Hedges wrote:
[...]
> If you feel inclined to take a further look, 0.9.5.2-6 is now at
> http://www.callpoint.org/splay/
Almost ok. debian/control must not hardcode the shlibs-dependencies,
use ${shlibs:Depends} instead.
cu andreas
W liście z pon, 16-08-2004, godz. 08:42, James Damour pisze:
> I've created a new set of package file and made them available at
> http://www.damour.info/debian/. Could someone please submit them to the
> upload queue for me (as I'm not a Debian Developer)?
done.
GBP
--
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:35:41PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2004-08-16 John Hedges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > There is a slight complication: the QA team uploaded a version that
> > fixed some arch bugs by setting architecture to all [1]. I don't seem to
> > be able to get the
* Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040813 00:56]:
> Tell me why I want to be interested,
> and then I might be.
so, what about it? he told you and what now? Are you interested?
we only want someone to judge the php side of things. i can
upload etc myself.
hello ashraf...
* Ashraf Emawi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-16 15:33 +0200]:
> hi all,
> i try to build debian-package of a small programm, and i used dh_make to
> get some help. under the directory DEBIAN/ i got files like rules,
> copyright, preinst.ex, postinst.ex, etc... after building packa
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 02:05:52PM +0200, Ashraf Emawi wrote:
> hi all,
> i try to build debian-package of a small programm, and i used dh_make to
> get some help. under the directory DEBIAN/ i got files like rules,
> copyright, preinst.ex, postinst.ex, etc... after building package and
> when i
Hello Chris,
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 03:08:27PM +0100, Chris Jefferson wrote:
> I'm currently trying to package MAME, but thought that I would also look
> for a sponsor, as I wasn't sure if it might be difficult for a
> contraversal package.
Emulation in general is not *that* controversial -- I
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 03:24:52PM +0100, John Hedges wrote:
[...]
> If you feel inclined to take a further look, 0.9.5.2-6 is now at
> http://www.callpoint.org/splay/
Almost ok. debian/control must not hardcode the shlibs-dependencies,
use ${shlibs:Depends} instead.
cu andreas
hi all,
i try to build debian-package of a small programm, and i used dh_make to
get some help. under the directory DEBIAN/ i got files like rules,
copyright, preinst.ex, postinst.ex, etc... after building package and
when i try to install my package, preinstall and postinstall will not be
use
On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 06:13, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 09:16:24AM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > > packages in contrib are allowed to FTBFS due to missing dependencies in
> > > Debian. You may close any FTBFS bugs on filler caused by
Dear Mentors
I received an email today from ftp-master telling me that there is a
licence issue with the package. Don't know whether this was triggered by
my posting. But anyway, this is resolved.
Thanks for your time & best regards
Andree
On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 00:13, Andree Leidenfrost wrote:
>
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:35:41PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2004-08-16 John Hedges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > There is a slight complication: the QA team uploaded a version that
> > fixed some arch bugs by setting architecture to all [1]. I don't seem to
> > be able to get the
* Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040813 00:56]:
> Tell me why I want to be interested,
> and then I might be.
so, what about it? he told you and what now? Are you interested?
we only want someone to judge the php side of things. i can
upload etc myself.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
Salvador Abreu wrote, Monday, August 16, 2004 11:55 AM:
> I've tried to deal with this with a control line:
> Architecture: i386 amd64 sparc mips alpha powerpc
> so that it only builds on some architectures.
>
> The trouble is I can't get a hold of any machine of these architectures
> to make bin
On 2004-08-16 Salvador Abreu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> GNU Prolog (the gprolog package) is a native-code compiler with
> back-ends for several targets and *no* "generic" target: it can't work
> for a given architecture unless a back-end has been written for it.
> I've tried to deal with this wi
begzkoeps? tqhpemomn epecvbpst xpqji qmnio dwtpqtly
Do you know that congress just
passed a new law and you can
spwhxv afxpdhh rxyscns, oibuxuv
r e f
inance your - mo.
r t gage with ZERO ra
t e?
jaurj qmnqivah cyvmo lzibrkty - ryyilryi kakebk
Find out if you fit their
requirements!
odwlduw
hello ashraf...
* Ashraf Emawi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-16 15:33 +0200]:
> hi all,
> i try to build debian-package of a small programm, and i used dh_make to
> get some help. under the directory DEBIAN/ i got files like rules,
> copyright, preinst.ex, postinst.ex, etc... after building packa
On 2004-08-16 John Hedges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> There is a slight complication: the QA team uploaded a version that
> fixed some arch bugs by setting architecture to all [1]. I don't seem to
> be able to get the latest sources
[...]
0.9.5.2-5 is available on every mirror, e.g.
http://
Hi,
GNU Prolog (the gprolog package) is a native-code compiler with
back-ends for several targets and *no* "generic" target: it can't work
for a given architecture unless a back-end has been written for it.
I've tried to deal with this with a control line:
Architecture: i386 amd64 sparc m
Hi.
An easy question: Where should I put a package that can fit in two
subsections? I'm looking in the policy, but it only lists which subsections
exist, but not a brief description.
In my case, I'm trying to adopt kxmleditor, which actually is in section
"editors", but I think "kde" is better
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 02:05:52PM +0200, Ashraf Emawi wrote:
> hi all,
> i try to build debian-package of a small programm, and i used dh_make to
> get some help. under the directory DEBIAN/ i got files like rules,
> copyright, preinst.ex, postinst.ex, etc... after building package and
> when i
hi all,
i try to build debian-package of a small programm, and i used dh_make to
get some help. under the directory DEBIAN/ i got files like rules,
copyright, preinst.ex, postinst.ex, etc... after building package and
when i try to install my package, preinstall and postinstall will not be
used
On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 06:13, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 09:16:24AM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > > packages in contrib are allowed to FTBFS due to missing dependencies in
> > > Debian. You may close any FTBFS bugs on filler caused by
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 09:16:24AM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > packages in contrib are allowed to FTBFS due to missing dependencies in
> > Debian. You may close any FTBFS bugs on filler caused by missing java2
> I think this should be missing *build*-dependencie
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 04:04:04PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 12:57:10PM +0100, John Hedges wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 12:13:37PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [...]
> > > * debian/copyright does not list the actual copyright notice. See
> > > http://lists.
Dear Mentors
I received an email today from ftp-master telling me that there is a
licence issue with the package. Don't know whether this was triggered by
my posting. But anyway, this is resolved.
Thanks for your time & best regards
Andree
On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 00:13, Andree Leidenfrost wrote:
>
Salvador Abreu wrote, Monday, August 16, 2004 11:55 AM:
> I've tried to deal with this with a control line:
> Architecture: i386 amd64 sparc mips alpha powerpc
> so that it only builds on some architectures.
>
> The trouble is I can't get a hold of any machine of these architectures
> to make bin
On 2004-08-16 Salvador Abreu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> GNU Prolog (the gprolog package) is a native-code compiler with
> back-ends for several targets and *no* "generic" target: it can't work
> for a given architecture unless a back-end has been written for it.
> I've tried to deal with this wi
begzkoeps? tqhpemomn epecvbpst xpqji qmnio dwtpqtly
Do you know that congress just
passed a new law and you can
spwhxv afxpdhh rxyscns, oibuxuv
r e f
inance your - mo.
r t gage with ZERO ra
t e?
jaurj qmnqivah cyvmo lzibrkty - ryyilryi kakebk
Find out if you fit their
requirements!
odwlduw
On 2004-08-16 John Hedges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> There is a slight complication: the QA team uploaded a version that
> fixed some arch bugs by setting architecture to all [1]. I don't seem to
> be able to get the latest sources
[...]
0.9.5.2-5 is available on every mirror, e.g.
http://
Hi,
GNU Prolog (the gprolog package) is a native-code compiler with
back-ends for several targets and *no* "generic" target: it can't work
for a given architecture unless a back-end has been written for it.
I've tried to deal with this with a control line:
Architecture: i386 amd64 sparc m
Hi.
An easy question: Where should I put a package that can fit in two
subsections? I'm looking in the policy, but it only lists which subsections
exist, but not a brief description.
In my case, I'm trying to adopt kxmleditor, which actually is in section
"editors", but I think "kde" is better
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 09:16:24AM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > packages in contrib are allowed to FTBFS due to missing dependencies in
> > Debian. You may close any FTBFS bugs on filler caused by missing java2
> I think this should be missing *build*-dependencie
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 04:04:04PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 12:57:10PM +0100, John Hedges wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 12:13:37PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [...]
> > > * debian/copyright does not list the actual copyright notice. See
> > > http://lists.
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> packages in contrib are allowed to FTBFS due to missing dependencies in
> Debian. You may close any FTBFS bugs on filler caused by missing java2
I think this should be missing *build*-dependencies.
To me it looks like filler 1.02-2 specifies java-compiler, debhelper a
Friedemann Schorer wrote:
Hi :-)
I put the line you mentioned on kde-look.org in my /etc/apt/soures.list, and
it worked quite well many weeks. But lately apt-get began reporting that the
Packages file can't be found: A 404 error is given.
Any hints hwy?
Read the announcement on the mentors.
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> packages in contrib are allowed to FTBFS due to missing dependencies in
> Debian. You may close any FTBFS bugs on filler caused by missing java2
I think this should be missing *build*-dependencies.
To me it looks like filler 1.02-2 specifies java-compiler, debhelper a
60 matches
Mail list logo
