Re: Package Name Choice

2004-08-07 Thread Brian Nelson
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 01:59:33AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > Hello Christoffer, > > * Christoffer Sawicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-07 01:38]: > > I'm packaging GTK-Qt Theme Engine [0] and have a question about the naming of > > the binary package. The name is currently gtk2-engines-gtk-qt wh

Dependency problem

2004-08-07 Thread Silke Reimer
Hallo! I am the sponsored maintainer of gdal. Since I have some open bugs I am preparing a new package, but I have a problem where I don't know what to insert in the dependency field of a package. Please look at bug number 25344 [1]: python-gdal contains the python bindings for libgdal1 and hen

Re: unnecessary adoption by QA-team

2004-08-07 Thread Nico Golde
Hello Andreas, * Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-07 22:40]: > > A ready package, that solve this bug is already available. > > Why did QA-group adopt this package instead to sponsor my upload? > > Well, finding a sponsor is sometimes rather difficult. I'm sorry, but > that's just the c

Dependency problem

2004-08-07 Thread Silke Reimer
Hallo! I am the sponsored maintainer of gdal. Since I have some open bugs I am preparing a new package, but I have a problem where I don't know what to insert in the dependency field of a package. Please look at bug number 25344 [1]: python-gdal contains the python bindings for libgdal1 and hen

Re: unnecessary adoption by QA-team

2004-08-07 Thread Nico Golde
Hello Andreas, * Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-07 22:40]: > > A ready package, that solve this bug is already available. > > Why did QA-group adopt this package instead to sponsor my upload? > > Well, finding a sponsor is sometimes rather difficult. I'm sorry, but > that's just the c

Re: Temporary sponsor for cpufreqd_1.1.2-3 (fixes an RC bug)

2004-08-07 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 08:07:38PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote: > On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 07:31:47PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: [...] > > Can somebody help? the package is here: > > http://oioio.altervista.org/debian/ [1] > > I'll sponsor you. I still feel sort of guilty for slowing down your

RFS [2]: gbuffy (adopted)

2004-08-07 Thread Adeodato Simó
[I'm resending the same mail of 2004-07-29. I'd be very glad to have this to make before the freeze. Thanks.] Hi all, I'm looking for a sponsor to upload a new gbuffy version for me. I've decided to adopt the gbuffy package since it is in bad shape, I use it every day and I wouldn't lik

Re: Temporary sponsor for cpufreqd_1.1.2-3 (fixes an RC bug)

2004-08-07 Thread David Weinehall
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 07:31:47PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: > Hi, > the guy who usually uploads cpufreqd for me is not answering my mails > (in the last 2 weeks, maybe he's on vacation). > > I have a new revision of the package that fixes an RC bug and I'd like > the package to be in the right

Temporary sponsor for cpufreqd_1.1.2-3 (fixes an RC bug)

2004-08-07 Thread Mattia Dongili
Hi, the guy who usually uploads cpufreqd for me is not answering my mails (in the last 2 weeks, maybe he's on vacation). I have a new revision of the package that fixes an RC bug and I'd like the package to be in the right place at the right time (as in Freeze time!). Can somebody help? the packa

Re: Temporary sponsor for cpufreqd_1.1.2-3 (fixes an RC bug)

2004-08-07 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 08:07:38PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote: > On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 07:31:47PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: [...] > > Can somebody help? the package is here: > > http://oioio.altervista.org/debian/ [1] > > I'll sponsor you. I still feel sort of guilty for slowing down your

RFS [2]: gbuffy (adopted)

2004-08-07 Thread Adeodato Simó
[I'm resending the same mail of 2004-07-29. I'd be very glad to have this to make before the freeze. Thanks.] Hi all, I'm looking for a sponsor to upload a new gbuffy version for me. I've decided to adopt the gbuffy package since it is in bad shape, I use it every day and I wouldn't lik

Re: Temporary sponsor for cpufreqd_1.1.2-3 (fixes an RC bug)

2004-08-07 Thread David Weinehall
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 07:31:47PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: > Hi, > the guy who usually uploads cpufreqd for me is not answering my mails > (in the last 2 weeks, maybe he's on vacation). > > I have a new revision of the package that fixes an RC bug and I'd like > the package to be in the right

Temporary sponsor for cpufreqd_1.1.2-3 (fixes an RC bug)

2004-08-07 Thread Mattia Dongili
Hi, the guy who usually uploads cpufreqd for me is not answering my mails (in the last 2 weeks, maybe he's on vacation). I have a new revision of the package that fixes an RC bug and I'd like the package to be in the right place at the right time (as in Freeze time!). Can somebody help? the packa

Request for Sponsor: updated packages for sid/sarge

2004-08-07 Thread Bruno Rodrigues
Hello. I need sponsors to upload my updated packages to fix all my existing bugs. My updated packages are available at http://www.litux.org/debian/unstable/ deb http://www.litux.org/debian unstable/ #deb-src http://www.litux.org/debian unstable/ From http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] * Ka

Request for Sponsor: updated packages for sid/sarge

2004-08-07 Thread Bruno Rodrigues
Hello. I need sponsors to upload my updated packages to fix all my existing bugs. My updated packages are available at http://www.litux.org/debian/unstable/ deb http://www.litux.org/debian unstable/ #deb-src http://www.litux.org/debian unstable/ From http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] * Kannel

Re: unnecessary adoption by QA-team

2004-08-07 Thread Andreas Barth
* Erik Schanze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040806 23:25]: > I have noticed that QA-team adopt the gif2png package. The QA group doesn't adopt packages, they are the _default_ owner of any package and bug if nobody is the current maintainer. So, as the package is currently orphaned, they are mentioned cur

Re: unnecessary adoption by QA-team

2004-08-07 Thread Andreas Barth
* Erik Schanze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040806 23:25]: > I have noticed that QA-team adopt the gif2png package. The QA group doesn't adopt packages, they are the _default_ owner of any package and bug if nobody is the current maintainer. So, as the package is currently orphaned, they are mentioned cur

Please update

2004-08-07 Thread Rebekah Tapia
GET your   U N IVE RSI T Y     D I PL0M A Do you want a prosperous future, increased earning powermore money and the respect of all? Cal1 this number: 206 -424- 1596 (anytime) There are no required tests, class e s,   books, or interviews! Get a   B a chelors, Masters,   M BA, and   D o ctorate (

RFS: libezgtk-ruby - Wrapper Interface of GTK+ for Ruby #2

2004-08-07 Thread Ervin Hearn III
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I would like to make another request for a sponsor of my libezgtk-ruby package. I have gotten my gpg key signed by a DD and have been maintaining the unrelated PennMUSH package, which is also looking for a sponsor, over the last 9 months. So, I'm not

RFS: PennMUSH #4

2004-08-07 Thread Ervin Hearn III
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello again, I'd like to make a request for a sponsor for my PennMUSH packages. I've received some very helpful input from a few members of the community, but haven't had a potential sponsor for a few months now. I've continued to keep the package up