Hi all,
I'm looking for a sponsor for libmqueue, POSIX message queues userspace
library (see also [1] for a little discussion about the package).
The package is ready at [2]. It is lintian/linda clean and builds
correctly in a sid chroot (pbuilder).
[1]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c
Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dear Mentors,
>
> I have a seemingly stupid question. Say I am not a DD yet, and has a
> security bug in a package I help maintaining. Upstream fixed it, so the
> package is ready, but upstream requires new library version from a
> dependency
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 11:41:37PM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
> Dear Mentors,
>
> I have a seemingly stupid question. Say I am not a DD yet, and has a
> security bug in a package I help maintaining. Upstream fixed it, so the
> package is ready, but upstream requires new library versio
Dear Mentors,
I have a seemingly stupid question. Say I am not a DD yet, and has a
security bug in a package I help maintaining. Upstream fixed it, so the
package is ready, but upstream requires new library version from a
dependency than the current Debian version. Asked the library maintainer
re
Hi all,
I'm looking for a sponsor for libmqueue, POSIX message queues userspace
library (see also [1] for a little discussion about the package).
The package is ready at [2]. It is lintian/linda clean and builds
correctly in a sid chroot (pbuilder).
[1]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c
Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dear Mentors,
>
> I have a seemingly stupid question. Say I am not a DD yet, and has a
> security bug in a package I help maintaining. Upstream fixed it, so the
> package is ready, but upstream requires new library version from a
> dependency
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 11:41:37PM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
> Dear Mentors,
>
> I have a seemingly stupid question. Say I am not a DD yet, and has a
> security bug in a package I help maintaining. Upstream fixed it, so the
> package is ready, but upstream requires new library versio
Hi!
I have adopted gif2png (Bug #261583).
Since previous maintainer isn't able to do an upload for me, so I'd like to ask
here for a sponsor, because I'm not a DD yet.
-
* Package name: gif2png
Version : 2.4.7-3
I made a package for rhythmbox-applet (look on mentors.debian.net) and
now looking for a sponsor. Please, check it out and upload to Debian if
you want. Any suggestions accepted :)
--
Dan Korostelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Эта часть сообщения подписана цифровой подпис
Dear Mentors,
I have a seemingly stupid question. Say I am not a DD yet, and has a
security bug in a package I help maintaining. Upstream fixed it, so the
package is ready, but upstream requires new library version from a
dependency than the current Debian version. Asked the library maintainer
re
Hi!
I have adopted gif2png (Bug #261583).
Since previous maintainer isn't able to do an upload for me, so I'd like to ask
here for a sponsor, because I'm not a DD yet.
-
* Package name: gif2png
Version : 2.4.7-3
benelux
---
H-G-H stimulates an increase in the production of H-G-H.
http://secretly.topbol.com
Clinical results based on trials show the following amazing results**:
88% muscle mass enhancement
84% higher energy levels
81-83% expanded exercise tolerance/endurance
81% increased muscle mass
I made a package for rhythmbox-applet (look on mentors.debian.net) and
now looking for a sponsor. Please, check it out and upload to Debian if
you want. Any suggestions accepted :)
--
Dan Korostelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: =?koi8-r?Q?=FC=D4=C1?= =?koi8-r?Q?_=DE=C1=D3=D4=D
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 07:31:45PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> Due to holiday of usualy sponsor, could somebody sponsor
> http://wolffelaar.nl/~jeroen/phpbb.tar for me? Fixes grave security bug,
> tested okay, no real changes to package except the new upstream sources
> of course.
Will l
Due to holiday of usualy sponsor, could somebody sponsor
http://wolffelaar.nl/~jeroen/phpbb.tar for me? Fixes grave security bug,
tested okay, no real changes to package except the new upstream sources
of course.
Thanks,
--Jeroen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: We
benelux
---
H-G-H stimulates an increase in the production of H-G-H.
http://secretly.topbol.com
Clinical results based on trials show the following amazing results**:
88% muscle mass enhancement
84% higher energy levels
81-83% expanded exercise tolerance/endurance
81% increased muscle mass
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 07:31:45PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> Due to holiday of usualy sponsor, could somebody sponsor
> http://wolffelaar.nl/~jeroen/phpbb.tar for me? Fixes grave security bug,
> tested okay, no real changes to package except the new upstream sources
> of course.
Will l
Due to holiday of usualy sponsor, could somebody sponsor
http://wolffelaar.nl/~jeroen/phpbb.tar for me? Fixes grave security bug,
tested okay, no real changes to package except the new upstream sources
of course.
Thanks,
--Jeroen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: We
Willi Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anyone tell me please if attached copyright file is OK? What I'm
> unsure about is if it's enough to list all the mentioned names in the
> package or do I have to do the painful act of working out who owns a
> copyright on which of the many scripts?
Acc
Willi Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anyone tell me please if attached copyright file is OK? What I'm
> unsure about is if it's enough to list all the mentioned names in the
> package or do I have to do the painful act of working out who owns a
> copyright on which of the many scripts?
Acc
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 12:11:25PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> * Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-29 11:43]:
> > I'm looking for a sponsor to upload a new gbuffy version for me. I've
> > decided to adopt the gbuffy package since it is in bad shape, I use it
> > every day and I wouldn't lik
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 12:11:25PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> * Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-29 11:43]:
> > I'm looking for a sponsor to upload a new gbuffy version for me. I've
> > decided to adopt the gbuffy package since it is in bad shape, I use it
> > every day and I wouldn't lik
Hello Adeodato,
* Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-29 11:43]:
> I'm looking for a sponsor to upload a new gbuffy version for me. I've
> decided to adopt the gbuffy package since it is in bad shape, I use it
> every day and I wouldn't like it to be removed from Debian. The wnpp
> bug is #
Hello Adeodato,
* Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-29 11:43]:
> I'm looking for a sponsor to upload a new gbuffy version for me. I've
> decided to adopt the gbuffy package since it is in bad shape, I use it
> every day and I wouldn't like it to be removed from Debian. The wnpp
> bug is #
On Thursday 29 July 2004 02.30, Joey Hess wrote:
> To use lsb init scripts in Debian, you need to have the lsb package
> installed. I don't think that we want to have debian packages
> depending on lsb, for one thing it pulls in lots of other stuff.
>
> I've also discovered that supposedly lsb com
On Thursday 29 July 2004 02.30, Joey Hess wrote:
> To use lsb init scripts in Debian, you need to have the lsb package
> installed. I don't think that we want to have debian packages
> depending on lsb, for one thing it pulls in lots of other stuff.
>
> I've also discovered that supposedly lsb com
26 matches
Mail list logo
