James Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> I've had a look at it. Hm, it's not exactly what I hoped for (at least
>> not at it's present stage of development), and since I think I'm not
>> going to use it, I also won't sponsor it.
>
> I'm sorry to hear that. I agree it is still in quite an ear
>
> I've had a look at it. Hm, it's not exactly what I hoped for (at least
> not at it's present stage of development), and since I think I'm not
> going to use it, I also won't sponsor it.
I'm sorry to hear that. I agree it is still in quite an early stage of
development, but AFAIK it is the onl
James Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> I've had a look at it. Hm, it's not exactly what I hoped for (at least
>> not at it's present stage of development), and since I think I'm not
>> going to use it, I also won't sponsor it.
>
> I'm sorry to hear that. I agree it is still in quite an ear
>
> I've had a look at it. Hm, it's not exactly what I hoped for (at least
> not at it's present stage of development), and since I think I'm not
> going to use it, I also won't sponsor it.
I'm sorry to hear that. I agree it is still in quite an early stage of
development, but AFAIK it is the onl
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 05:48:05PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dan Korostelev wrote:
> > How to properly debianize and maintain CVS versions of software? There's
> > no tarballs and no in directory name.
>
> Make a orig.tar.gz out of the CVS co.
Please use cvs export, not cvs co. Hav
Hi,
Dan Korostelev wrote:
> How to properly debianize and maintain CVS versions of software? There's
> no tarballs and no in directory name.
Make a orig.tar.gz out of the CVS co.
and name it something like +cvsYYMMDD
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 07:02:08PM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
> How to properly debianize and maintain CVS versions of software? There's
> no tarballs
Make one yourself from whatever you're using as upstream source. For
instance, if upstream has a 'make dist' target or similar, you could run
tha
How to properly debianize and maintain CVS versions of software? There's
no tarballs and no in directory name.
--
Dan Korostelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 05:48:05PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dan Korostelev wrote:
> > How to properly debianize and maintain CVS versions of software? There's
> > no tarballs and no in directory name.
>
> Make a orig.tar.gz out of the CVS co.
Please use cvs export, not cvs co. Hav
Hi,
Dan Korostelev wrote:
> How to properly debianize and maintain CVS versions of software? There's
> no tarballs and no in directory name.
Make a orig.tar.gz out of the CVS co.
and name it something like +cvsYYMMDD
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 07:02:08PM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
> How to properly debianize and maintain CVS versions of software? There's
> no tarballs
Make one yourself from whatever you're using as upstream source. For
instance, if upstream has a 'make dist' target or similar, you could run
tha
How to properly debianize and maintain CVS versions of software? There's
no tarballs and no in directory name.
--
Dan Korostelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 02 July 2004 09:20, Stan Pinte wrote:
> someone send me a mail, saying that these packages are already
> maintained since 1.5 years...
>
> (http://mentors.debian.net/debian/dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/kno
>da/)
>
> I'll have a look, and contact their maintainer first.
I wanted to spo
* Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-04 12:12:27 +0200]:
> > Thanks Andreas. But how can I specify major and minor numbers? As I
> > know and seems MAKEDEV supports only a list of devices it knows. As my
> > device entry would be specific, I get:
> > /sbin/MAKEDEV: don't know how to mak
On 2004-07-04 Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-04 08:39:59 +0200]:
> > On 2004-07-04 Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > One of my packages require a device to be crated for functioning. It is
> > > ok if the
* Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-04 08:39:59 +0200]:
> On 2004-07-04 Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > One of my packages require a device to be crated for functioning. It is
> > ok if the user has a normal /dev/, but how should I handle the udev
> > case? I ca
On Friday 02 July 2004 09:20, Stan Pinte wrote:
> someone send me a mail, saying that these packages are already
> maintained since 1.5 years...
>
> (http://mentors.debian.net/debian/dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/kno
>da/)
>
> I'll have a look, and contact their maintainer first.
I wanted to spo
* Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-04 12:12:27 +0200]:
> > Thanks Andreas. But how can I specify major and minor numbers? As I
> > know and seems MAKEDEV supports only a list of devices it knows. As my
> > device entry would be specific, I get:
> > /sbin/MAKEDEV: don't know how to mak
On 2004-07-04 Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-04 08:39:59 +0200]:
> > On 2004-07-04 Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > One of my packages require a device to be crated for functioning. It is
> > > ok if the
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 03:48:07AM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
>Debian's gwget packages is outdated, so I packaged the new upstream
>version from scratch with new name, manpage and other cool features. I
>also provided a transitional packages. I already mailed Debian's gwget
>maintainer, but I wan
В сообщении от Вск, 2004-07-04 at 17:57 +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar
писал:
> /bin/sh: line 1: /usr/bin/docbook-to-man: No such file or directory
Fixed (added docbook-to-man to Build-Depends)
> You are trying to hijack gwget2 and replace it with gwget. This is not
> the way to do it appropriate
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 09:04:09AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
>On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 03:48:07AM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
>>Debian's gwget packages is outdated, so I packaged the new upstream
>>version from scratch with new name, manpage and other cool features. I
>>also provided a transitio
* Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-04 08:39:59 +0200]:
> On 2004-07-04 Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > One of my packages require a device to be crated for functioning. It is
> > ok if the user has a normal /dev/, but how should I handle the udev
> > case? I ca
Please don't include that svn+perms script in any package. It needs
some more work before I'm ready to support it.
For what it's worth, Subversion 1.1.0 will support symlinks.
--
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://ben.reser.org
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be lo
В сообщении от Вск, 2004-07-04 at 09:04 +0200, Geert Stappers писал:
> So there is already a Debian package of gwget
> and you felt the itch to update it.
> My first thought was "looks like a hi-jack"
hi-jack?
> http://packages.debian.org/gwget says "Can't find that package"
Debian's package nam
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 10:16:25AM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
>?? ?? ??, 2004-07-04 at 12:13 +1000, Anibal Monsalve
>Salazar
>??:
>
>>When I run pbuilder on the debian source package of gwget, it couldn't
>>fetch from my local debian mirror:
>>libgnome2-common_2.
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 03:48:07AM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
> Debian's gwget packages is outdated, so I packaged the new upstream
> version from scratch with new name, manpage and other cool features. I
> also provided a transitional packages. I already mailed Debian's gwget
> maintainer, but I
On 2004-07-04 Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of my packages require a device to be crated for functioning. It is
> ok if the user has a normal /dev/, but how should I handle the udev
> case? I can detect it, no problem; still I am looking forward for
> documentation how
В сообщении от Вск, 2004-07-04 at 12:13 +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar
писал:
> When I run pbuilder on the debian source package of gwget, it couldn't
> fetch from my local debian mirror:
> libgnome2-common_2.6.1-6_all.deb
> libgnome2-0_2.6.1-6_i386.deb
> libgnome2-dev_2.6.1-6_i386.deb
May be you
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 03:48:07AM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
>Debian's gwget packages is outdated, so I packaged the new upstream
>version from scratch with new name, manpage and other cool features. I
>also provided a transitional packages. I already mailed Debian's gwget
>maintainer, but I wan
Ð ÑÐÐÐÑ ÐÑ ÐÑÐ, 2004-07-04 at 17:57 +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar
ÐÐÑÐÐ:
> /bin/sh: line 1: /usr/bin/docbook-to-man: No such file or directory
Fixed (added docbook-to-man to Build-Depends)
> You are trying to hijack gwget2 and replace it with gwget. This is not
> the way to do it appropriate
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 09:04:09AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
>On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 03:48:07AM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
>>Debian's gwget packages is outdated, so I packaged the new upstream
>>version from scratch with new name, manpage and other cool features. I
>>also provided a transitio
Please don't include that svn+perms script in any package. It needs
some more work before I'm ready to support it.
For what it's worth, Subversion 1.1.0 will support symlinks.
--
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://ben.reser.org
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be lo
Ð ÑÐÐÐÑ ÐÑ ÐÑÐ, 2004-07-04 at 09:04 +0200, Geert Stappers
ÐÐÑÐÐ:
> So there is already a Debian package of gwget
> and you felt the itch to update it.
> My first thought was "looks like a hi-jack"
hi-jack?
> http://packages.debian.org/gwget says "Can't find that package"
Debian's package na
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 10:16:25AM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
>?? ?? ??, 2004-07-04 at 12:13 +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar
>??:
>
>>When I run pbuilder on the debian source package of gwget, it couldn't
>>fetch from my local debian mirror:
>>libgnome2-common_2.6.
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 03:48:07AM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
> Debian's gwget packages is outdated, so I packaged the new upstream
> version from scratch with new name, manpage and other cool features. I
> also provided a transitional packages. I already mailed Debian's gwget
> maintainer, but I
36 matches
Mail list logo
