Hi, my name is Fabio Tranchitella, and I just started the process to
become an official Debian Developer. My first package was already
checked and uploaded from sgran, but he haven't enough time to help me
with my second package, gtkdialog. It is very similar to xdialog, but
with gtkdialog develope
Marcin Orlowski wrote:
Hi,
I've packaged some native window decorations and some
window styles for KDE and look for sponsor. All the
packages are recently uploaded to mentors.debian.net
and these are:
kwin-decor-activeheart
kwin-decor-baghira
kwin-decor-fahrenheit
kwin-decor-grover
kwin-decor-
Hello !
I've done some very interesting package that I would like to be available to the
most, so I'm looking for a sponsor for uploading.
All is already available for FreeBSD in the port collection. So if it's usefull
for BSD, why not for debian ! Have a look, it's easy to use and install.
1.
Hi,
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 06:25:41PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Looking for some advice. Recently a bug was filed on one of my packages
> that really had me pulling my hair out - it turned out to be that the
> test to make sure debconf input was numeric was failing because I u
Marcin Orlowski wrote:
Hi,
I've packaged some native window decorations and some
window styles for KDE and look for sponsor. All the
packages are recently uploaded to mentors.debian.net
and these are:
kwin-decor-activeheart
kwin-decor-baghira
kwin-decor-fahrenheit
kwin-decor-grover
kwin-decor-kbcl
Hello all,
Looking for some advice. Recently a bug was filed on one of my packages
that really had me pulling my hair out - it turned out to be that the
test to make sure debconf input was numeric was failing because I use
[[:digit:]]* and the user's shell was dash. I've checked the scripts
with
Hello !
I've done some very interesting package that I would like to be available to the
most, so I'm looking for a sponsor for uploading.
All is already available for FreeBSD in the port collection. So if it's usefull
for BSD, why not for debian ! Have a look, it's easy to use and install.
1.
Hi,
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 06:25:41PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Looking for some advice. Recently a bug was filed on one of my packages
> that really had me pulling my hair out - it turned out to be that the
> test to make sure debconf input was numeric was failing because I u
Lucas Albers:
> I'd like to adopt this package, and I would need someone to sponsor me on
> it for the upload.
>
Are there any files to look over?
Did you realized that the project website and author email has changed?
I had also a look at this package and has communicate with upstream, but
you an
Hallo Lucas,
* Lucas Albers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-26 22:15]:
> Standards-Version: 3.5.6
it has to be 3.6.1
regards nico
--
Nico Golde | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
http://www.ngolde.de| GnuPG Key: http://www.ngolde.de/gpg/nico_golde.gpg
Fin
Hello all,
Looking for some advice. Recently a bug was filed on one of my packages
that really had me pulling my hair out - it turned out to be that the
test to make sure debconf input was numeric was failing because I use
[[:digit:]]* and the user's shell was dash. I've checked the scripts
with
Lucas Albers:
> I'd like to adopt this package, and I would need someone to sponsor me on
> it for the upload.
>
Are there any files to look over?
Did you realized that the project website and author email has changed?
I had also a look at this package and has communicate with upstream, but
you an
Hallo Lucas,
* Lucas Albers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-26 22:15]:
> Standards-Version: 3.5.6
it has to be 3.6.1
regards nico
--
Nico Golde | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ngolde.de| GnuPG Key: http://www.ngolde.de/gpg/nico_golde.gpg
Fing
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 05:22:50PM +0800, Zak B. Elep wrote:
[...]
>* New upstream version, merged patches in 0.9p-1 to upstream source
> (Closes:
> #153779, #170642, #226839)
[...]
>* More bug fixes (Closes: #170025, #174518, #177478)
[...]
Hello,
A significant percentage of d-ds, i
On Wed, 26 May 2004 12:46:44 +0200
Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> /usr/share/doc/python/python-policy.*
> Without dh_python, byte-compilation is usually done with
> /usr/lib/python$PV/compileall.py.
Yes, I read the policy, and I know about this script. But the problem is
that byte
Hello,
I've just uploaded gtklp_0.9s-1 at
http://zakame.spunge.org/pub/debian/gtklp/ . It promises lots of bug
fixes, a GTK2 interface, and gnutls10 support. Again, I ask for a more
input regarding the packaging, additional bugfixes, and other items of
interest.
Here's the signed changes file for
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 05:22:50PM +0800, Zak B. Elep wrote:
[...]
>* New upstream version, merged patches in 0.9p-1 to upstream source (Closes:
> #153779, #170642, #226839)
[...]
>* More bug fixes (Closes: #170025, #174518, #177478)
[...]
Hello,
A significant percentage of d-ds, incl
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 15:54, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote:
> ey,
>
> I've now fully tested my package. I've learned the debconf stuff. And i
> think my package is now ready.
>
> I've fixed a critical bug:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=240384
>
> Also added more language support t
On Wed, 26 May 2004 12:46:44 +0200
Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> /usr/share/doc/python/python-policy.*
> Without dh_python, byte-compilation is usually done with
> /usr/lib/python$PV/compileall.py.
Yes, I read the policy, and I know about this script. But the problem is
that byte
Hello,
I've just uploaded gtklp_0.9s-1 at
http://zakame.spunge.org/pub/debian/gtklp/ . It promises lots of bug
fixes, a GTK2 interface, and gnutls10 support. Again, I ask for a more
input regarding the packaging, additional bugfixes, and other items of
interest.
Here's the signed changes file for
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 15:54, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote:
> ey,
>
> I've now fully tested my package. I've learned the debconf stuff. And i
> think my package is now ready.
>
> I've fixed a critical bug:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=240384
>
> Also added more language support t
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, upon installation you should somehow create precompiled python
> files (*.pyc). I don't know python myself, but there must be some
> preferred way to do so, iirc there is a (unofficial?) python policy.
Right. I would not say it is unofficia
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, upon installation you should somehow create precompiled python
> files (*.pyc). I don't know python myself, but there must be some
> preferred way to do so, iirc there is a (unofficial?) python policy.
Right. I would not say it is unofficia
23 matches
Mail list logo
