On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 10:03:17AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>
> I need to improve on my reading skills. ;-) - I'll offer advise in
> exchange: You should install or upgrade autotools-dev on your machine,
> config.(guess|sub) is still old because the respective code in
> debian/rules requires
Simon MARTIN wrote:
> GNotify is a little daemon written in C using GTK. It provides
> (like the KDE KNotify-system) a notification-service for
> Gnome/XFce/FVWM/Fluxbox/Enlightenment and other
> Desktop-Environments/WindowManagers.
Can you change this to explain what this means for a user (w
On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 19:38, Nick Urban wrote:
> Hi, I've been using Debian for a few years, and I'd like to help out.
Cool.
>
> I love Debian as a server on older hardware, and I'd like to use it on
> my desktop too.
> Sadly, I've always found it lacking in desktop-relevant areas like
> hardw
On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 11:24:59PM +0200, Simon MARTIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> , whereas version 0.8-9 is the first one that is completely
> lintian-clean (the only warnings that remain are those:
I may be wrong on this, but for me 'lintian clean' means without
warnings even.
> W: gnotify s
Hi, I've been using Debian for a few years, and I'd like to help out.
I love Debian as a server on older hardware, and I'd like to use it on
my desktop too.
Sadly, I've always found it lacking in desktop-relevant areas like
hardware autodetection/configuration and support for newer hardware. I
Simon MARTIN wrote:
> GNotify is a little daemon written in C using GTK. It provides
> (like the KDE KNotify-system) a notification-service for
> Gnome/XFce/FVWM/Fluxbox/Enlightenment and other
> Desktop-Environments/WindowManagers.
Can you change this to explain what this means for a user (w
On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 19:38, Nick Urban wrote:
> Hi, I've been using Debian for a few years, and I'd like to help out.
Cool.
>
> I love Debian as a server on older hardware, and I'd like to use it on
> my desktop too.
> Sadly, I've always found it lacking in desktop-relevant areas like
> hardw
On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 11:24:59PM +0200, Simon MARTIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> , whereas version 0.8-9 is the first one that is completely
> lintian-clean (the only warnings that remain are those:
I may be wrong on this, but for me 'lintian clean' means without
warnings even.
> W: gnotify so
On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 11:24:59PM +0200, Simon MARTIN wrote:
> Hi debian-mentors!
>
> First of all, the most important information:
>
> ===
>
> * Package name: gnotify
> Version : 0.8
> Upstream Author : Marius M. M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://gnoti
Hi, I've been using Debian for a few years, and I'd like to help out.
I love Debian as a server on older hardware, and I'd like to use it on
my desktop too.
Sadly, I've always found it lacking in desktop-relevant areas like
hardware autodetection/configuration and support for newer hardware. I
Hi debian-mentors!
First of all, the most important information:
===
* Package name: gnotify
Version : 0.8
Upstream Author : Marius M. M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gnotify.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : a notification ser
On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 11:24:59PM +0200, Simon MARTIN wrote:
> Hi debian-mentors!
>
> First of all, the most important information:
>
> ===
>
> * Package name: gnotify
> Version : 0.8
> Upstream Author : Marius M. M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://gnoti
Hi debian-mentors!
First of all, the most important information:
===
* Package name: gnotify
Version : 0.8
Upstream Author : Marius M. M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gnotify.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : a notification ser
On 2004-04-29 GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I maintain a package, which needs en_US locale for testing the build. I
> did it as writing en_US to /etc/locale.gen and generate the locales
> again, if it's not yet done. Then set LC_ALL to en_US, and do the test.
> So far, so good, it works. But no
Hi,
I maintain a package, which needs en_US locale for testing the build. I
did it as writing en_US to /etc/locale.gen and generate the locales
again, if it's not yet done. Then set LC_ALL to en_US, and do the test.
So far, so good, it works. But now I got a FTBFS as a simple user it can
not be b
On 2004-04-29 GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I maintain a package, which needs en_US locale for testing the build. I
> did it as writing en_US to /etc/locale.gen and generate the locales
> again, if it's not yet done. Then set LC_ALL to en_US, and do the test.
> So far, so good, it works. But no
Hi,
I maintain a package, which needs en_US locale for testing the build. I
did it as writing en_US to /etc/locale.gen and generate the locales
again, if it's not yet done. Then set LC_ALL to en_US, and do the test.
So far, so good, it works. But now I got a FTBFS as a simple user it can
not be b
On 2004-04-29 Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> automake --add-missing --copy && autoconf
‐‐force‐missing is missing. - Just for the archives.
cu andreas
Hi Matthew,
> I have gone ahead and made the changes so that you can see them in
> action. This is done in 0.9.9.3-5 which I have uploaded to your
> queue. As far as I can tell, that deals with the last item on your
> initial review of the package, let me know if you find anything
> else!
Have yo
On 2004-04-29 "Zak B. Elep" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 09:43:32AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> > Imho the build-depency on gnutls should simply be droppep, gtklp does
> > not use gnutls, it is just a libtool artefact caused by
> > libcupsys2-dev, which already de
On 2004-04-29 Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> automake --add-missing --copy && autoconf
ââforceâmissing is missing. - Just for the archives.
cu andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Matthew,
> I have gone ahead and made the changes so that you can see them in
> action. This is done in 0.9.9.3-5 which I have uploaded to your
> queue. As far as I can tell, that deals with the last item on your
> initial review of the package, let me know if you find anything
> else!
Have yo
On 2004-04-29 "Zak B. Elep" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 09:43:32AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> > Imho the build-depency on gnutls should simply be droppep, gtklp does
> > not use gnutls, it is just a libtool artefact caused by
> > libcupsys2-dev, which already de
23 matches
Mail list logo
