On Wednesday 10 March 2004 17:08, Frank Küster wrote:
> In particular, I'm looking for something like
>
> "The contents of the orig.tar.gz should match contents of the
> downloaded archive, as specified in copyright, as closely as
> possible. If there are changes, they have to be documented in ...
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 17:08, Frank Küster wrote:
> In particular, I'm looking for something like
>
> "The contents of the orig.tar.gz should match contents of the
> downloaded archive, as specified in copyright, as closely as
> possible. If there are changes, they have to be documented in ...
Thorsten Sauter wrote:
> * Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-10 19:08]:
> | (base)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dchroot sid
> | (unstable)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/debian_version
>
> ^
>
> how do you do this? I have also tried something like this, but without
> any success.
Take a lo
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-10 20:02]:
| * Thorsten Sauter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-10 19:52]:
| > | (base)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dchroot sid
| > | (unstable)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/debian_version
| >
| > ^
| >
| > how do you do this? I have also tried someth
* Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-10 20:14]:
| On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 07:52:20PM +0100, Thorsten Sauter wrote:
| > * Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-10 19:08]:
| > | (base)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dchroot sid
| > | (unstable)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/debian_version
| >
| > ^^
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 07:52:20PM +0100, Thorsten Sauter wrote:
> * Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-10 19:08]:
> | (base)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dchroot sid
> | (unstable)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/debian_version
>
> ^
>
> how do you do this? I have also tried something like t
* Thorsten Sauter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-10 19:52]:
> | (base)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dchroot sid
> | (unstable)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/debian_version
>
> ^
>
> how do you do this? I have also tried something like this, but without
> any success.
Look at the dchroot package.
* Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-10 19:08]:
| (base)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dchroot sid
| (unstable)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/debian_version
^
how do you do this? I have also tried something like this, but without
any success.
Thanks
Thorsten
--
Thorsten Sauter
<[EMAIL PRO
J> I'm trying to compile and pack on different architectures, but
> after my first attempt I realized
> that all Debian hosts are running Woody, not Sid.
This is a good thing -- Think security updates ;-)
> Question: how and where do I build for Sid?
> Has '+chroots' anything to do with it?
>
>
Thorsten Sauter wrote:
> * Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-10 19:08]:
> | (base)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dchroot sid
> | (unstable)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/debian_version
>
> ^
>
> how do you do this? I have also tried something like this, but without
> any success.
Take a lo
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-10 20:02]:
| * Thorsten Sauter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-10 19:52]:
| > | (base)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dchroot sid
| > | (unstable)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/debian_version
| >
| > ^
| >
| > how do you do this? I have also tried someth
* Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-10 20:14]:
| On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 07:52:20PM +0100, Thorsten Sauter wrote:
| > * Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-10 19:08]:
| > | (base)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dchroot sid
| > | (unstable)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/debian_version
| >
| > ^^
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 07:52:20PM +0100, Thorsten Sauter wrote:
> * Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-10 19:08]:
> | (base)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dchroot sid
> | (unstable)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/debian_version
>
> ^
>
> how do you do this? I have also tried something like t
* Thorsten Sauter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-10 19:52]:
> | (base)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dchroot sid
> | (unstable)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/debian_version
>
> ^
>
> how do you do this? I have also tried something like this, but without
> any success.
Look at the dchroot package.
* Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-10 19:08]:
| (base)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dchroot sid
| (unstable)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/debian_version
^
how do you do this? I have also tried something like this, but without
any success.
Thanks
Thorsten
--
Thorsten Sauter
<[EMAIL PRO
Matthew Palmer wrote:
>>I am just writting to ask for some documentation resources on www-based
>>packages, if exists. Otherwise, any help or hint would be great.
> No real documentation that I'm aware of, but as has been mentioned, no
> shortage of examples. I wouldn't use irm as a good example o
J> I'm trying to compile and pack on different architectures, but
> after my first attempt I realized
> that all Debian hosts are running Woody, not Sid.
This is a good thing -- Think security updates ;-)
> Question: how and where do I build for Sid?
> Has '+chroots' anything to do with it?
>
>
Hi,
it seems I'm kind of blind, but I cannot find the section in Policy that
describes the requirements for orig.tar.gz. There must be some, right?
In particular, I'm looking for something like
"The contents of the orig.tar.gz should match contents of the downloaded
archive, as specified in cop
Thank you for contacting Lodging.com. This note is to let you know we
received your e-mail message on 3/10/04 at 08:30:20 AM. Your tracking
number for this inquiry is 543621.
While you are waiting for a response from a Lodging.com Customer Service
representative, you may find the answer to you
Frank Küster wrote:
- give the long and short description of your package, as well as a
place where the source files can be retrieved from.
echat
Provided under terms of GPL-2.
Description: console Vypress/quick Chat clone that uses ncurses
eChat is a serverless messaging system dedicated
Matthew Palmer wrote:
>>I am just writting to ask for some documentation resources on www-based
>>packages, if exists. Otherwise, any help or hint would be great.
> No real documentation that I'm aware of, but as has been mentioned, no
> shortage of examples. I wouldn't use irm as a good example o
Hi,
it seems I'm kind of blind, but I cannot find the section in Policy that
describes the requirements for orig.tar.gz. There must be some, right?
In particular, I'm looking for something like
"The contents of the orig.tar.gz should match contents of the downloaded
archive, as specified in cop
Hello Brian!
Say, should we rather take this off the list now?
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:26:57AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Please tell me if there is anything else you want me to check / fix.
>
> Well, some of your debhelper stuff could use updat
Thank you for contacting Lodging.com. This note is to let you know we
received your e-mail message on 3/10/04 at 08:30:20 AM. Your tracking
number for this inquiry is 543621.
While you are waiting for a response from a Lodging.com Customer Service
representative, you may find the answer to you
Frank KÃster wrote:
- give the long and short description of your package, as well as a
place where the source files can be retrieved from.
echat
Provided under terms of GPL-2.
Description: console Vypress/quick Chat clone that uses ncurses
eChat is a serverless messaging system dedicated to
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 01:53:03PM -0800, Link Dupont wrote:
> > Well, sorry for hurring up you, but I'm just too excited with whole
> > packaging stuff, and Debian as well ;)
> >
> > I probably have to many time for Debian, and every hour is an eternity
> > for me ;)
> Lucky for you. My day's are
Artūras Šlajus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Hello,
>
>I've created new package (echat), checked it with lintian, tested it, it
> seems OK.
> Now i want to submit it. I read that i can "Many people wish to contribute to
> Debian
> and first try to become official developers, even though tha
Hello Brian!
Say, should we rather take this off the list now?
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:26:57AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Please tell me if there is anything else you want me to check / fix.
>
> Well, some of your debhelper stuff could use updat
Hello,
I've created new package (echat), checked it with lintian, tested it, it
seems OK.
Now i want to submit it. I read that i can "Many people wish to contribute to
Debian
and first try to become official developers, even though that's not necessary.
In fact, we recommend that people start
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 10:42:53AM +, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > > You should give us a little bit more time. Maybe I will give it a try
> > > this evening or tomorrow. If its fine I will be happy to sponsor you, if
> > > not you have to fix the problems :).
> > Well, sorry for hurring up you,
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 01:53:03PM -0800, Link Dupont wrote:
> > Well, sorry for hurring up you, but I'm just too excited with whole
> > packaging stuff, and Debian as well ;)
> >
> > I probably have to many time for Debian, and every hour is an eternity
> > for me ;)
> Lucky for you. My day's are
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 09:25:00PM +0100, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 09:58:19AM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > > Well, noone interested? That's bad, cause I thought that Debian's
> > > builders will be helpful with porting it to another architectures :/
> > > Ok, ne
ArtÅras Ålajus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Hello,
>
>I've created new package (echat), checked it with lintian, tested it, it seems OK.
> Now i want to submit it. I read that i can "Many people wish to contribute to Debian
> and first try to become official developers, even though that's no
Hello,
I've created new package (echat), checked it with lintian, tested it, it seems OK.
Now i want to submit it. I read that i can "Many people wish to contribute to Debian
and first try to become official developers, even though that's not necessary.
In fact, we recommend that people start co
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 10:42:53AM +, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > > You should give us a little bit more time. Maybe I will give it a try
> > > this evening or tomorrow. If its fine I will be happy to sponsor you, if
> > > not you have to fix the problems :).
> > Well, sorry for hurring up you,
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 07:38:45AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 05:32:03PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> >> I have a package that has an optional part that cannot presently be
> >> built in main but ships a (java bytecode) bi
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 09:25:00PM +0100, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 09:58:19AM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > > Well, noone interested? That's bad, cause I thought that Debian's
> > > builders will be helpful with porting it to another architectures :/
> > > Ok, ne
Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 05:32:03PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
>> I have a package that has an optional part that cannot presently be
>> built in main but ships a (java bytecode) binary in the tarball.
>> Policy prevents me from adding this to the bina
* Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-10 07:48]:
| Hi Jörgen,
|
| > Question: how and where do I build for Sid?
| > Has '+chroots' anything to do with it?
|
| Just try "dchroot sid" on one of these machines :-)
| Hint: copy your package to /home/chroots/sid/home/ first.
nope that isn'
On 2004-03-10 Jörgen Hägg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to compile and pack on different architectures, but
> after my first attempt I realized
> that all Debian hosts are running Woody, not Sid.
> Question: how and where do I build for Sid?
> Has '+chroots' anything to do with it?
> (L
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 07:38:45AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 05:32:03PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> >> I have a package that has an optional part that cannot presently be
> >> built in main but ships a (java bytecode) bi
Hi Jörgen,
> Question: how and where do I build for Sid?
> Has '+chroots' anything to do with it?
Just try "dchroot sid" on one of these machines :-)
Hint: copy your package to /home/chroots/sid/home/ first.
--jochen
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 06:04:42AM +0100, Jörgen Hägg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to compile and pack on different architectures,
Why? Is the package so different during packing on different archs?
> but
> after my first attempt I realized
> that all Debian hosts are running Woody, no
43 matches
Mail list logo